TripAdvisor
#721
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,374
#722
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 6,900
BTW, the clear indication of fake reviews is that if you see bunch of 4*/5* reviews coming on a short period of time and all these reviews are only for that particular attraction/hotel. Above hotel is the classical case of such fake/bought reviews - it opened in February and already has bunch of such 5* reviews. Clearly a red flag for any savvy traveller.
Last edited by invisible; Aug 30, 2016 at 1:29 am
#723
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bridport, Dorset
Programs: Mucci, BA Bronze, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,130
TLDR/
TripAdvisor is of course part of Expedia/Hotels.com so it's in their interests to get good reviews so that they can then get the booking, for which they receive enormous commissions. So it is somewhat of a symbiotic relationship...
On the other hand, I have stayed at hotels (and even B&Bs) with the key card emblazoned with the TripAdvisor logo, and with me being urged to leave a review - these tend to be hotels who do the right thing seemingly all the time and are confident in what they offer.
TripAdvisor is of course part of Expedia/Hotels.com so it's in their interests to get good reviews so that they can then get the booking, for which they receive enormous commissions. So it is somewhat of a symbiotic relationship...
On the other hand, I have stayed at hotels (and even B&Bs) with the key card emblazoned with the TripAdvisor logo, and with me being urged to leave a review - these tend to be hotels who do the right thing seemingly all the time and are confident in what they offer.
#724
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 545
Haven't seen much activity in this thread of late.
Tripadvisor refused to post one of my reviews recently wherein I gave a low rating because the service was poor. It was a perfectly normal, I thought, critical review that mirrored many other recent reviews of the same restaurant. After a week pending, they said it didn't rise to their standards...
Tripadvisor refused to post one of my reviews recently wherein I gave a low rating because the service was poor. It was a perfectly normal, I thought, critical review that mirrored many other recent reviews of the same restaurant. After a week pending, they said it didn't rise to their standards...
#725
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,438
Similar case here. I wrote a bunch of reviews and curiously the only one not published was the one where I gave a restaurant 1 star and was highly critical. They did not publish it for several weeks - and not until after I threatened to stop submitting any more reviews to them and start publishing them on other websites.
#726
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 4,871
There is a restaurant in England called Hedone known for its chefs immaculate procurement of ingredients. If you want the most carefully selected fowl, bovine, crustacean, mollusc, etc, you go here.
The 1* and 2* negative reviews are almost exclusively from gluten-free msg-adverse non-fish eating raw food vegans who are baffled the restaurant couldn't cater to their chosen dietary restrictions.
These people should be dragged out in an alleyway and shot. Or at least slapped around a bit.
Nothing against those with true , involuntary food allergies. Or even personal preferences. It's just that I won't step into a dance club to complain that the music is too loud.
The 1* and 2* negative reviews are almost exclusively from gluten-free msg-adverse non-fish eating raw food vegans who are baffled the restaurant couldn't cater to their chosen dietary restrictions.
These people should be dragged out in an alleyway and shot. Or at least slapped around a bit.
Nothing against those with true , involuntary food allergies. Or even personal preferences. It's just that I won't step into a dance club to complain that the music is too loud.
#727
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,438
There is a restaurant in England called Hedone known for its chefs immaculate procurement of ingredients. If you want the most carefully selected fowl, bovine, crustacean, mollusc, etc, you go here.
The 1* and 2* negative reviews are almost exclusively from gluten-free msg-adverse non-fish eating raw food vegans who are baffled the restaurant couldn't cater to their chosen dietary restrictions.
These people should be dragged out in an alleyway and shot. Or at least slapped around a bit.
Nothing against those with true , involuntary food allergies. Or even personal preferences. It's just that I won't step into a dance club to complain that the music is too loud.
The 1* and 2* negative reviews are almost exclusively from gluten-free msg-adverse non-fish eating raw food vegans who are baffled the restaurant couldn't cater to their chosen dietary restrictions.
These people should be dragged out in an alleyway and shot. Or at least slapped around a bit.
Nothing against those with true , involuntary food allergies. Or even personal preferences. It's just that I won't step into a dance club to complain that the music is too loud.
The sense of entitlement some people have is staggering. I've also seen those 1* reviews for great restaurants that 'refused to create a separate tasting menu on the spot to accommodate my vegan, gluten-free, lactose-intolerant diet, etc., etc.'
I also hate the ones who will write a review for say, Hedone, and say (with no detail whatsoever) something like, 'there's so much better food to be had in London'. Really? Where did you find better food? What was wrong with what you had?
#728
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: NZ*G, United.
Posts: 194
Following this thread I was looking at some local restaurant reviews on TA to see hwo they squared with my experience. I found a lengthy one very critical of the service somewhere I had thought of as OK but average. Talking about this at dinner my daughter recognised the story - coincidentally she had been eating there at the same time as the reviewers. Her view, they were drunk, obnoxious and abusive and it was a relief to all when they left. Just goes to show.
#729
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: MUC
Programs: TK Elite, FB Gold
Posts: 315
Doesn't Booking.com have a better review system? It only allows people that booked the hotel through their website to review it. While I may not always book a room through them, I do use them for the reviews.
#730
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 394
FWIW, I just had several of my reviews published, and one was a pretty bad review (2 stars) of a H.Inn and another was a "meh" average review.
#731
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
it has always been very easy for properties to have reviews removed
that does not mean there is not (any) data to be found on tripadvisor
booking.com is priceline, which is expedia's competitor
priceline did a deal with tripadvisor after expedia spun it off
that does not mean there is not (any) data to be found on tripadvisor
booking.com is priceline, which is expedia's competitor
priceline did a deal with tripadvisor after expedia spun it off
#732
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BDL/PVD
Programs: UA, Marriott, Amex
Posts: 226
One thing most tourist & traveller's donot know, is the fact that 70% of the review on TA are bought either by the agencies which are directly link to the hotel & restaurant.
These form of fake review's is rampart on most review's communities. the agency usually paid few individual from different part of the globe to post positive review in favor of their services. This are known as paid review's. And because they are paid review's the administrator/moderator of such review site[s] have little or no control over them.However, they are quick to decline any negative review's against such companies.
*My suggestion is to always compare each of these review's based on from other review site's by extending your research upto 10th,11th,12th pages of google search engine. Probably, most geniue review(s) will be within the 11th,12th ..pages of google for same reason - that most agencies can go as far as hiring seo and reputation management to push such negative review's down to the last pages of google. So, in term's of review be patient to get to the last pages before dealing with such company.
Thanks
Chuck
Thanks
These form of fake review's is rampart on most review's communities. the agency usually paid few individual from different part of the globe to post positive review in favor of their services. This are known as paid review's. And because they are paid review's the administrator/moderator of such review site[s] have little or no control over them.However, they are quick to decline any negative review's against such companies.
*My suggestion is to always compare each of these review's based on from other review site's by extending your research upto 10th,11th,12th pages of google search engine. Probably, most geniue review(s) will be within the 11th,12th ..pages of google for same reason - that most agencies can go as far as hiring seo and reputation management to push such negative review's down to the last pages of google. So, in term's of review be patient to get to the last pages before dealing with such company.
Thanks
Chuck
Thanks
I am also a top contributor and have never had a review rejected.
#733
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1
I used to be a fraud analyst at TA. You guys are wrong- while some bad reviews do get through the filters, TripAdvisor does not protect certain listings from bad reviews. Believe me, I have no love for this company after the class A ***** that took over my department got me fired for calling her out on questionable management practices, but the company (which is no longer related to Expedia by the way) does their best to maintain the integrity of their content.
Property owners can pay a fee for a higher level of service with TA which gets them a heightened level of response from the moderators when they want a review removed from their listing, which might be the reason some of your reviews get gummed up in the works, but if the disputed review meets the community guidelines, the review will be posted. Period.
And believe me, the behavior of the owners who make these disputes is tracked for abuse/fraud just as closely as as the members who submit reviews.
Yes, there are organizations out there trying to game the system and sometimes bad reviews get on the site but the next time you see a 'computer generated' review, instead of complaining about it on here, simply use the reporting tool on TripAdvisor (located right in the review itself) and if it's truly a fake review I guarantee you it will be dealt with.
Property owners can pay a fee for a higher level of service with TA which gets them a heightened level of response from the moderators when they want a review removed from their listing, which might be the reason some of your reviews get gummed up in the works, but if the disputed review meets the community guidelines, the review will be posted. Period.
And believe me, the behavior of the owners who make these disputes is tracked for abuse/fraud just as closely as as the members who submit reviews.
Yes, there are organizations out there trying to game the system and sometimes bad reviews get on the site but the next time you see a 'computer generated' review, instead of complaining about it on here, simply use the reporting tool on TripAdvisor (located right in the review itself) and if it's truly a fake review I guarantee you it will be dealt with.
#734
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: YOW
Posts: 74
TripAdvisor stops selling tickets to several animal attractions
TripAdvisor has decided to stop selling tickets to attractions where humans come in contact with wild or endangered animals held in captivity.
This decision was based on rigorous consultation with animal welfare groups and associations. While the sale of tickets will be suspended, site users will still be able to review these attractions as per current policies.
TripAdvisor consultation group and partners include, among others, organizations like PETA and Association of Zoos and Aquariums that have locked heads consistently over animal welfare. Walking a tight rope, TripAdvisor has decided to continue selling tickets to zoos and aquariums. It will also include exemptions for domestic animals, supervised animal feeding programs, children’s petting zoos etc.
While TripAdvisor undertakes this big change it will also establish an appeals process for establishments that have been excluded through this update but can provide evidence and prove otherwise.
For those interested, a complete coverage with media release link is on my blog - http://travelupdate.boardingarea.com...elling-policy/
This decision was based on rigorous consultation with animal welfare groups and associations. While the sale of tickets will be suspended, site users will still be able to review these attractions as per current policies.
TripAdvisor consultation group and partners include, among others, organizations like PETA and Association of Zoos and Aquariums that have locked heads consistently over animal welfare. Walking a tight rope, TripAdvisor has decided to continue selling tickets to zoos and aquariums. It will also include exemptions for domestic animals, supervised animal feeding programs, children’s petting zoos etc.
While TripAdvisor undertakes this big change it will also establish an appeals process for establishments that have been excluded through this update but can provide evidence and prove otherwise.
For those interested, a complete coverage with media release link is on my blog - http://travelupdate.boardingarea.com...elling-policy/
#735
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 68
Yes, I agree with you. I use TripAdvisor to determine hotel rates, read traveller reviews, and list down top-rated places to visit. It's one of the most helpful travel sites, I think. ^