Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

New DOT Rules

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

New DOT Rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 4:48 pm
  #31  
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: DL DM, DL MM
Posts: 4,427
Originally Posted by FlyingUnderTheRadar
What I am proposing is no different than shipping with UPS or the USPS.

Note I did not say it should not be free. I said they had to accept responsibility. They could easily drop the limit for compensation to a say $500 and accept liability for everything. If you are traveling with crap worth more than it is your responsibility to either have trip insurance for your crap or "self" insure it. As I say it is no different than shipping with UPS or the USPS.
This makes zero sense. Why ask the airline to drop compensation limits so that they pay you on small electronics when you can easily carry your IPOD in your purse/briefcase?

If I am travelling and check in 3 suits I should have to make due with only $500 because you cannot carry your 12 ounce IPOD in your briefcase? My luggage doesn't - but some people's luggage alone costs more than $500.

Not reimbursing on electronics makes sense because you can tote them in your carry-on very easily
FlyAO2 is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 6:00 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tokyo and anyplace cheaper
Programs: Delta Diamond. SPG Plat. Hyatt Diamond. Segafredo coffee stamp card, inContinental
Posts: 474
Originally Posted by FlyAO2

Not reimbursing on electronics makes sense because you can tote them in your carry-on very easily
Electronics are used in larger things than ipods. Aeroplanes; for example. Tote-away !
werldporks is offline  
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 11:06 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Originally Posted by StayingHomeIsBetter
I don't seek to discourage anyone from posting comments at the DOT site, in fact I encourage it.

But, it is going to take a lot of postings to be heard above the background noise.

109 pages of public comments... no, I did not read them all. But every one I opened, (repeat, every one) pertained to the peanut allergy issue.
I don't think it will be that bad. First of all, the DOT is actually required to read and respond to every comment. Second, when people say the same thing over and over, they generally will respond with something like, "Many commenters said X," or "27 comments mentioned Y." Unique ideas get attention. I once provided unique comments to some FAA regulations (I'm a pilot), which were individually responded to when the final rule came out.
DaDaDan is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 1:34 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVPG, DL DM
Posts: 219
Baggage liability is not just a Delta issue, anymore than most of these are, but if airlines have more (not total) responsibility for baggage handling, they are well-positioned to demand improvement. Of 47 connections I have had through MIA, my bags have made it with me, to my destination, without theft or damage, twice. I now avoid this airport and, as a result, American, like the plague. AA has to have some power in decisions here...
NW Mourning is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2010 | 12:28 pm
  #35  
Moderator: Hilton Honors forums
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marietta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 25,433
Exclamation Alert: Thread Moved

Because this is not a topic specific to Delta Air Lines or the SkyMiles frequent flier loyalty program, the new home for this thread is now the TravelBuzz! forum.

Regards,

Canarsie
Co-Moderator, Delta SkyMiles forum
Canarsie is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2010 | 4:53 pm
  #36  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW
Posts: 352
I've had my bags delayed a few times but luckily, never destroyed.
black dawn is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2010 | 10:44 pm
  #37  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYNY
Programs: Marriott LT Titanium, UA Silver, AA PLT
Posts: 857
Many of these rules seem like common sense good ideas. But, how will the 24 hour rules possibly help consumers? Surely this will do nothing but drive up base fares.

My suggestion would be to also ban the practice of charging for seats in your ticketed cabin. If you are ticketed for economy, you should be able to reserve any economy seat, unless there is a safety reason (e.g. exit row seating). This is by far one of the biggest scams perpetrated by airlines on consumers, imho.
newbiztraveler is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2010 | 11:23 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Programs: UA Mileage Plus, AA Advantage
Posts: 5,983
I had one bag delayed on AA but it came on the next flight a few hours later and was shipped to my hotel. With that being said I don't like this idea at all because in my view it is more government nannying but I do agree with refunding the bag fees though.
CubsFanJohn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.