Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

WI-FI router reliability

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WI-FI router reliability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 11:34 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
Long story short--a UPS transitioning from line to battery makes most surge strips think it's a surge. They then cause (quite intentionally) a short. Bad for the UPS electronics. Do it often enough, and it's quite likely to cause a large enough short to blow both the surge strip and the UPS electronics.

A line-interactive and/or double-conversion UPS will take care of the spikes/surges. Only power bars (without surge protection) should be plugged into their load side.

Now, if you have a good UPS that puts out a true sine-wave (not an approximation, not pretty good, but an actual sine wave output), some of this does not apply. Unless you put the UPS on a bench and test it, make no assumptions that it's an actual sine-wave output.

Basically, square-wave output and stepped-wave output waveforms can make a surge strip think it's a surge/spike, and they short. That's bad for the UPS. Wikipedia sort of gets this right, but they don't really explain why (non sine-wave output waveforms are what cause the surge strip to go nuts and short).
ClueByFour is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 11:44 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Programs: SPG Gold
Posts: 162
Learned the need for a UPS the hard way. I have a buffalo router which has been reliable so far.
thorthor is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 1:24 pm
  #33  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by ClueByFour
Guys, the UPS itself should last forever. The only thing you should need to change is the actual battery.
I've had one that one day decided it's job was to pop the mains breaker.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 1:53 am
  #34  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ACT/GRK/DAL/ABI/MIA/FLL
Programs: OMNIArchist, OMNIArchy!, OMNIIDGAS
Posts: 23,478
Originally Posted by ClueByFour
Long story short--a UPS transitioning from line to battery makes most surge strips think it's a surge. They then cause (quite intentionally) a short. Bad for the UPS electronics. Do it often enough, and it's quite likely to cause a large enough short to blow both the surge strip and the UPS electronics.

A line-interactive and/or double-conversion UPS will take care of the spikes/surges. Only power bars (without surge protection) should be plugged into their load side.

Now, if you have a good UPS that puts out a true sine-wave (not an approximation, not pretty good, but an actual sine wave output), some of this does not apply. Unless you put the UPS on a bench and test it, make no assumptions that it's an actual sine-wave output.

Basically, square-wave output and stepped-wave output waveforms can make a surge strip think it's a surge/spike, and they short. That's bad for the UPS. Wikipedia sort of gets this right, but they don't really explain why (non sine-wave output waveforms are what cause the surge strip to go nuts and short).
this is the same reason you can not link up UPS units 'in line' to have hours of battery on a desktop pc, router, etc.
Steph3n is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 2:13 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tanya Buri, Thailand
Programs: CX, TG, SPG all back to base.
Posts: 775
Thanks for the explanation CBF. I was aware that certain appliances/components don't like pseudo-sinewaves, didn't realise it was that way for surge supporessors too.
Meerkat is offline  
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 8:16 am
  #36  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 870
You forgot to include a link to the third party firmware, http://www.linksysinfo.org/forums/index.php. Right?
DD-WRT:
http://www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv3/index.php

Tomato:
http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato

As another poster said, these things are under $100, so I have low expectations. I'd probably spend up to $500 if I could be assured of something more reliable.
Please try the firmware upgrade and the Linksys/Buffalo routers listed above. I had reliability issues with my Netgear, but with my $60 Linksys w/DD-WRT the thing runs rocks solid. Just set up another old Linksys as a Wireless Repeater to increase the signal in my house. Couldn't be happier.

Thanks!
pred02 is offline  
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 8:17 am
  #37  
2M
50 Countries Visited
5M
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 7,179
I have always had very good luck with netgear routes. Indeed, one needs to often make sure the firmware is up to date, but over the past oh 6+ years, I have had very good success with probably about 20+ routers, switches and access points. I really like their software, historically offering many features like address reservation that are very easy to impliment and use, and access. I have also had good luck with linksys (although there was a period there where I think their quality went down) and their open access wooed me over a few years ago to a router that would run DD-WRT and tomato (which I use now for their great implimentation of QOS on the router)

recently though, netgear announced that they TOO were going to offer AP's and routers that would use the open source communities firmwares :

http://www.myopenrouter.com/

And their pricing is very attractive. I might pick one up to try it, and compare it to the other linksys and buffalos that I have running tomato.

I honestly, would not encourage anyone away from netgear, and actually for the more common consumer user I think they represent a better fit with their UI and features implimentation. Linksys has come a long way in the past few years in that regard as well.
nmenaker is offline  
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 7:52 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 545
Originally Posted by MileageAddict
My 4th wi-fi router in 4 years is going senile on me. This one stops emitting a signal after 10-45 minutes of usage and needs to be unplugged and replugged to start working again. The last three didn't die with such style as they just stopped working suddenly.

All of the have been Netgear. I'm done with Netgear unless others can comment on the reliability of the wi-fi routers also being crappy.
In my personal experience (3 routers - and never again) Netgear makes cheap garbage that overheats far too easily. Not surprisingly they have short warranties. And poor support to boot. Just avoid them.

Last edited by osamede; Jul 3, 2008 at 8:02 am
osamede is offline  
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 10:12 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area
Programs: UA, Marriott, WN
Posts: 3,864
There's no way you should be going through routers that fast. Either change your manufacturer or put a UPS inbetween the router and the wall to filter the power.
primusux is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 6:41 am
  #40  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
I hear bad things about Netgear, but then again I just replaced my Netgear which worked fine for over 5 years. I replaced it with another Netgear, this one with Wireless N and gigabit.
SRQ Guy is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 6:14 am
  #41  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,045
One hears many bad things and some good things about every consumer level wi-fi router.
richarddd is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.