Had it with Norton - Recommendations for Replacement
#76
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 7,419
Originally Posted by jeffo
I got that message and did upgrade. I believe that it's the version you are using will no longer be free or working in the future. But from what I could see, version 7.5 is still free.
Here is the link to upgrade to 7.5 (free)
http://free.grisoft.com/freeweb.php/doc/2/
Here is the link to upgrade to 7.5 (free)
http://free.grisoft.com/freeweb.php/doc/2/
#77
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,186
Originally Posted by USAFAN
I am using version 7.5 ... today I got a message from grisoft that's only be free until January 15, 2007 

"GRISOFT is announcing a new version of the AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition. This new 7.5 version with improved performance and full compatibility with the latest Windows Vista version is available. Users that are using AVG Free 7.1 will be provided with a specific dialog, within the next few weeks, with the opportunity to choose the right option fulfilling their needs. AVG Free 7.1 version will be discontinued on 15th of Jan 2007."
#78


Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SYD
Posts: 1,466
As an update, I am quite pleased with Eset's NOD32. Much lighter on system resources than Kaspersky, but seems to provide as much protection. Doesn't add too much to startup time and scans equally quickly.
Combined with the COMODO firewall I think it's quite an effective yet lightweight solution.
Combined with the COMODO firewall I think it's quite an effective yet lightweight solution.
#79
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt DIA, Hilton GLD
Posts: 37
Free version of Kaspersky -- AOL Active Virus Shield
I also got fed up with Norton. It seemed to bog things down and sometimes wouldn't play nice with some of the ThinkVantage applications on my ThinkPad. I even tried going back to a Corporate Edition of Norton that I dug up from an old W2K laptop, but that was too old and didn't communicate its status with the XP Windows Security Center control panel.
I checked out a couple of different trial versions of other anti-virus programs and settled on a free version of Kaspersky offered by AOL (of all firms), the AOL Active Virus Shield. You can find the download through CNET's download.com. You don't have to be an AOL subscriber, but you do have to give them an e-mail address (to get the activation code by e-mail).
It seems to be lighter on system resources than Norton, works with the XP Windows Security Center, and plays nice with the ThinkVantage applications. The underlying Kaspersky engine seems to be well-regarded. And the price is right. So far so good. If I do end up with a virus, I'll probably check out the full version of Kaspersky Anti-Virus to try to get rid of it. The free version from AOL is only a scanner and shield. Recovery and clean-up requires the full version.
I checked out a couple of different trial versions of other anti-virus programs and settled on a free version of Kaspersky offered by AOL (of all firms), the AOL Active Virus Shield. You can find the download through CNET's download.com. You don't have to be an AOL subscriber, but you do have to give them an e-mail address (to get the activation code by e-mail).
It seems to be lighter on system resources than Norton, works with the XP Windows Security Center, and plays nice with the ThinkVantage applications. The underlying Kaspersky engine seems to be well-regarded. And the price is right. So far so good. If I do end up with a virus, I'll probably check out the full version of Kaspersky Anti-Virus to try to get rid of it. The free version from AOL is only a scanner and shield. Recovery and clean-up requires the full version.
#80
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: A Southern locale that ain't the South.
Programs: Bah, HUMBUG!
Posts: 8,014
I tried Kaspersky out, it absolutely was not lighter in use than Norton was. The problem was that it would scan incessantly and I couldn't change it's behavior. While scanning, it slowed the system (dual core 2.13 running at 3.2Ghz, 2GB ram, 10k RPM HDD, NOT slow) noticably and hammered the hard drive. It did seem to be a better virus engine though, if I could've sorted the issues out i would still use it. I went back to Norton Corporate. Still looking at other options.
#81
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,481
Originally Posted by kanebear
I tried Kaspersky out, it absolutely was not lighter in use than Norton was. The problem was that it would scan incessantly and I couldn't change it's behavior. While scanning, it slowed the system (dual core 2.13 running at 3.2Ghz, 2GB ram, 10k RPM HDD, NOT slow) noticably and hammered the hard drive. It did seem to be a better virus engine though, if I could've sorted the issues out i would still use it. I went back to Norton Corporate. Still looking at other options.
#84
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: AA GLD; UA 2P; HHonors GLD; SPG
Posts: 793
AVG loses out when it comes to detection rates.
I would recommend Kaspersky, NOD32, McAfee, and Norton.
If you're going to go McAfee or Norton, try to get your hands on an Enterprise copy.
I would recommend Kaspersky, NOD32, McAfee, and Norton.
If you're going to go McAfee or Norton, try to get your hands on an Enterprise copy.
#87


Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: T82
Programs: AA Gold, HH Gold
Posts: 2,845
I'm not an expert computer user. Do uninstall Norton before I download something like NOD32? I have a feeling the answer is yes because I'm sure Norton, even though it's off, will do something that causes a problem, but just needed to ask.
#88
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: on the Llano Estacado
Posts: 2,652
You do need to uninstall Norton before installing NOD32, but it won't interfere with downloading it.




