Work from home tech thread
#137
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
#138




Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 7,174
All these features have been part of zoom for many years they are just not enabled by default to make it very easy to join for any user from any device. Now, I think password and waiting room is enabled by default
#139
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,439
#140


Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: BA, Virgin, Lufthansa
Posts: 189
On the Zoom front, if you'd rather not install the native client the Chrome App client is pretty decent, doesn't quite do everything the native client does though
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/d...hljndfdfdipjhg
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/d...hljndfdfdipjhg
#141
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA Silver, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 23,164
Instead of a mesh solution, I installed an AV1000 powerline ethernet solution throughout my house to hook up my various media players to allow for better wireless bandwidth for four laptops and four phones (two adults working from home and two kids doing remote learning).
#142




Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: OKC
Programs: IHG Plat, National EE, AA Plat
Posts: 2,536
Phone: Cisco 525G2. I know there's softphones, but I still prefer a physical phone. These are cheap on the resale market, support SIP, WiFi, and Bluetooth. You can even pair your mobile phone with it and use the Cisco's interface & handset for mobile phone calls. It also is quite happy using my phone's hotspot as its connection.
#143
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
QUESTION for zoom experts:
Earlier this week, I was in a pre-arranged zoom meeting. Initially, when I tried to enter at the scheduled time, I got a message that the host hadn't yet started the meeting (this continued for at least ten minutes) and then I thought I saw something saying that the host was in a different meeting. Anyway, we eventually started and had about twenty people. Later the meeting suddenly cut off, at forty minutes after the *scheduled* starting time and I wasn't able to find the meeting again. When I explore my free personal zoom account, it says that meetings over three people are limited to forty minutes and offers an option to upgrade to some premium zoom service.
I also have a zoom account from my employer where I've been scheduling meetings for up to about twenty-five people that last over two hours, I seem to be able to start these meetings early, even very early, and to continue past the scheduled ending time without problem. However, without clear rules, I'm not willing to use my work zoom account for things of a more personal nature.
Is my guess right that our meeting host was trying to use a personal account inappropriately and should have had a (presumably paid) business account or at least the enhanced personal account (presumably also paid)? I feel offended that the guy has apparently been doing a series of these zoom meetings and accepting the limitations of using a personal account because he's too cheap to set up some sort of a paid account for a small business. I also had the impression that he was attempting to do a bunch of these zoom "meetings" back-to-back, knowing full well that there would be strict and somewhat unreasonable (IME given what I implicitly paid to participate) time limits. In other words, I suspect that our meeting host is a jerk and might well be violating the terms of his zoom account. Am I being unfair here?
BTW, this was a "marketing" function by a smallish-business. In fact, it was a pre-arranged wine tasting (organized by a wine store for a bunch of people who are strangers to each other) with a successful (even celebrity and cult-iish) winemaker as host; the co-host seemed to be a representative of the winery's distributor for the state.
Earlier this week, I was in a pre-arranged zoom meeting. Initially, when I tried to enter at the scheduled time, I got a message that the host hadn't yet started the meeting (this continued for at least ten minutes) and then I thought I saw something saying that the host was in a different meeting. Anyway, we eventually started and had about twenty people. Later the meeting suddenly cut off, at forty minutes after the *scheduled* starting time and I wasn't able to find the meeting again. When I explore my free personal zoom account, it says that meetings over three people are limited to forty minutes and offers an option to upgrade to some premium zoom service.
I also have a zoom account from my employer where I've been scheduling meetings for up to about twenty-five people that last over two hours, I seem to be able to start these meetings early, even very early, and to continue past the scheduled ending time without problem. However, without clear rules, I'm not willing to use my work zoom account for things of a more personal nature.
Is my guess right that our meeting host was trying to use a personal account inappropriately and should have had a (presumably paid) business account or at least the enhanced personal account (presumably also paid)? I feel offended that the guy has apparently been doing a series of these zoom meetings and accepting the limitations of using a personal account because he's too cheap to set up some sort of a paid account for a small business. I also had the impression that he was attempting to do a bunch of these zoom "meetings" back-to-back, knowing full well that there would be strict and somewhat unreasonable (IME given what I implicitly paid to participate) time limits. In other words, I suspect that our meeting host is a jerk and might well be violating the terms of his zoom account. Am I being unfair here?
BTW, this was a "marketing" function by a smallish-business. In fact, it was a pre-arranged wine tasting (organized by a wine store for a bunch of people who are strangers to each other) with a successful (even celebrity and cult-iish) winemaker as host; the co-host seemed to be a representative of the winery's distributor for the state.
#144
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,771
You're being a little harsh. It's hardly "inappropriate" to use a free Zoom account. You just have to accept the limitations.
In any case, Zoom is not expensive for a paid account as I recall. My company uses Teams so that's what I use all the time.
In any case, Zoom is not expensive for a paid account as I recall. My company uses Teams so that's what I use all the time.
#145




Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 7,174
QUESTION for zoom experts:
Earlier this week, I was in a pre-arranged zoom meeting. Initially, when I tried to enter at the scheduled time, I got a message that the host hadn't yet started the meeting (this continued for at least ten minutes) and then I thought I saw something saying that the host was in a different meeting. Anyway, we eventually started and had about twenty people. Later the meeting suddenly cut off, at forty minutes after the *scheduled* starting time and I wasn't able to find the meeting again. When I explore my free personal zoom account, it says that meetings over three people are limited to forty minutes and offers an option to upgrade to some premium zoom service.
I also have a zoom account from my employer where I've been scheduling meetings for up to about twenty-five people that last over two hours, I seem to be able to start these meetings early, even very early, and to continue past the scheduled ending time without problem. However, without clear rules, I'm not willing to use my work zoom account for things of a more personal nature.
Is my guess right that our meeting host was trying to use a personal account inappropriately and should have had a (presumably paid) business account or at least the enhanced personal account (presumably also paid)? I feel offended that the guy has apparently been doing a series of these zoom meetings and accepting the limitations of using a personal account because he's too cheap to set up some sort of a paid account for a small business. I also had the impression that he was attempting to do a bunch of these zoom "meetings" back-to-back, knowing full well that there would be strict and somewhat unreasonable (IME given what I implicitly paid to participate) time limits. In other words, I suspect that our meeting host is a jerk and might well be violating the terms of his zoom account. Am I being unfair here?
BTW, this was a "marketing" function by a smallish-business. In fact, it was a pre-arranged wine tasting (organized by a wine store for a bunch of people who are strangers to each other) with a successful (even celebrity and cult-iish) winemaker as host; the co-host seemed to be a representative of the winery's distributor for the state.
Earlier this week, I was in a pre-arranged zoom meeting. Initially, when I tried to enter at the scheduled time, I got a message that the host hadn't yet started the meeting (this continued for at least ten minutes) and then I thought I saw something saying that the host was in a different meeting. Anyway, we eventually started and had about twenty people. Later the meeting suddenly cut off, at forty minutes after the *scheduled* starting time and I wasn't able to find the meeting again. When I explore my free personal zoom account, it says that meetings over three people are limited to forty minutes and offers an option to upgrade to some premium zoom service.
I also have a zoom account from my employer where I've been scheduling meetings for up to about twenty-five people that last over two hours, I seem to be able to start these meetings early, even very early, and to continue past the scheduled ending time without problem. However, without clear rules, I'm not willing to use my work zoom account for things of a more personal nature.
Is my guess right that our meeting host was trying to use a personal account inappropriately and should have had a (presumably paid) business account or at least the enhanced personal account (presumably also paid)? I feel offended that the guy has apparently been doing a series of these zoom meetings and accepting the limitations of using a personal account because he's too cheap to set up some sort of a paid account for a small business. I also had the impression that he was attempting to do a bunch of these zoom "meetings" back-to-back, knowing full well that there would be strict and somewhat unreasonable (IME given what I implicitly paid to participate) time limits. In other words, I suspect that our meeting host is a jerk and might well be violating the terms of his zoom account. Am I being unfair here?
BTW, this was a "marketing" function by a smallish-business. In fact, it was a pre-arranged wine tasting (organized by a wine store for a bunch of people who are strangers to each other) with a successful (even celebrity and cult-iish) winemaker as host; the co-host seemed to be a representative of the winery's distributor for the state.
If they are always using the host ID for that meeting, then yes someone who has been given credentials to it can come in - Early say and enter the same meeting. I usually always create a NEW meeting and not with my primary host ID so each meeting has it's own unique link and only the ppl to whom I have sent it can get in.
You MAY have been waiting, even if the host was in the meeting since zoom has enabled the "waiting room" feature and any new meetings attendees, even with credentials have to be "allowed" into the meeting. The host may have not seen the pop ups on a phone or computer or tablet, and if they don't let the new attendees in then they sit in a waiting room indefinitely (well, maybe not that long) Certainly for someone doing many meetings, getting an actual 12.99$ account can't be too much - and it doesn't have to be a business account just the personal account up from the Basic free one gets one most of the features that the official biz/enterprise account does. I think the later really only adds some things like length or RECORDED meetings and storage and some stuff like that which most personal users probably don't need.
#146
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MCI
Programs: AA Gold 1MM, AS MVP, UA Silver, WN A-List, Marriott LT Titanium, HH Diamond
Posts: 53,010
I have a free Zoom account. It's random whether or not your meeting gets a free extension past 40 minutes: you get a pop-up notice with 10 minutes left. I've had about ten calls so far with it, and maybe a third get the free extension. But...everybody knows that if the meeting dies, you can just jump back on the same link and you're in a new 40-minute meeting. Works fine for personal stuff.
Microsoft Teams is our enterprise platform, so I have no experience with the paid Zoom versions. Zoom is occasionally a little glitchy for me...I'd be hesitant to use it professionally unless the enterprise version is a LOT better. I would certainly never put clients/colleagues through the randomness of the 40-minute thing. I've occasionally had Zoom think I was in another meeting, or that some other person hosting was in another meeting. It seems a bit fickle at times.
I've long thought most of these videoconference platforms had too many little drawbacks, but I will admit I've been pleasantly surprised by Teams. Doubly surprising because I've always hated Sharepoint, and I realize that's what's running under the hood with Teams.
Microsoft Teams is our enterprise platform, so I have no experience with the paid Zoom versions. Zoom is occasionally a little glitchy for me...I'd be hesitant to use it professionally unless the enterprise version is a LOT better. I would certainly never put clients/colleagues through the randomness of the 40-minute thing. I've occasionally had Zoom think I was in another meeting, or that some other person hosting was in another meeting. It seems a bit fickle at times.
I've long thought most of these videoconference platforms had too many little drawbacks, but I will admit I've been pleasantly surprised by Teams. Doubly surprising because I've always hated Sharepoint, and I realize that's what's running under the hood with Teams.
#147
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 50,840
I have a free Zoom account. It's random whether or not your meeting gets a free extension past 40 minutes: you get a pop-up notice with 10 minutes left. I've had about ten calls so far with it, and maybe a third get the free extension. But...everybody knows that if the meeting dies, you can just jump back on the same link and you're in a new 40-minute meeting. Works fine for personal stuff.
Microsoft Teams is our enterprise platform, so I have no experience with the paid Zoom versions. Zoom is occasionally a little glitchy for me...I'd be hesitant to use it professionally unless the enterprise version is a LOT better. I would certainly never put clients/colleagues through the randomness of the 40-minute thing. I've occasionally had Zoom think I was in another meeting, or that some other person hosting was in another meeting. It seems a bit fickle at times.
I've long thought most of these videoconference platforms had too many little drawbacks, but I will admit I've been pleasantly surprised by Teams. Doubly surprising because I've always hated Sharepoint, and I realize that's what's running under the hood with Teams.
Microsoft Teams is our enterprise platform, so I have no experience with the paid Zoom versions. Zoom is occasionally a little glitchy for me...I'd be hesitant to use it professionally unless the enterprise version is a LOT better. I would certainly never put clients/colleagues through the randomness of the 40-minute thing. I've occasionally had Zoom think I was in another meeting, or that some other person hosting was in another meeting. It seems a bit fickle at times.
I've long thought most of these videoconference platforms had too many little drawbacks, but I will admit I've been pleasantly surprised by Teams. Doubly surprising because I've always hated Sharepoint, and I realize that's what's running under the hood with Teams.
#148
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
With my employer's zoom contract, I can set up meetings for up to 300 people, although I can't imagine that I'd ever need to be able to do so. I've done meetings for about thirty that have lasted almost three hours with no problem. I'm also able to start scheduled meetings as early as I want and to go overtime with no problem. At some point, we switched from Skype to zoom, but of course with work from home orders, we've been using zoom a lot more. The only problem I've noticed is using a photo as my background, and the same issues arise with both my work and personal accounts.
BTW, I've been on zoom meetings with over a thousand people, but the controls have been set so that I can't see anyone except the host or the panelists, can't turn on my microphone, and can only send chat messages to a small group of "panelists" although on some meetings, the Q&A function allows everyone to chat with everyone.
BTW, I've been on zoom meetings with over a thousand people, but the controls have been set so that I can't see anyone except the host or the panelists, can't turn on my microphone, and can only send chat messages to a small group of "panelists" although on some meetings, the Q&A function allows everyone to chat with everyone.
#149




Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London
Programs: AA EXP, SPG Plt
Posts: 2,613

