Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

7-inch tablet recommendations

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

7-inch tablet recommendations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 4:10 am
  #61  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,784
Originally Posted by planemechanic
But one can and does frequently have them plugged in at the hotel desk while working on the computer. The power cord is not an issue for most people.


Which is an irrelevance to the question of whether an external dangling storage device is useful "expanded storage" for a tablet (or phone, although that's already expanding the scope beyond richardd and my point of disagreement about whether that's a useful form of expansion as opposed to only loading/backing up).

For that matter, any tablet with battery life as limited as most laptops' would be an absolute dud in the marketplace.
nkedel is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 5:52 am
  #62  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,044
Plug in external storage, copy files to tablet, unplug external storage.
richarddd is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 9:04 am
  #63  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,292
I understand the various arguments such as the cloud being sufficient, that you can use external removable storage to meet your needs, etc. However, I don't think there is a valid argument against a tablet having a mini SD slot to provide the *option* of internal removable storage. Some say it needlessly adds cost, but that cost is negligible. You could say that the cards can get lost, but if this is a concern, you can just leave it in place all the time and it would function just like non-removable internal storage. You can argue that most people don't need to expand or remove storage, but given the negligible cost, why not provide those who might differ the option?
mooper is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 9:30 am
  #64  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Because the space of the card slot is needed for other things like a bigger battery. Apple wanted to do without a SIM slot on the new iphone for space savings, but the providers talked them out of it (going to a virtual sim instead)
cordelli is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 10:05 am
  #65  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,292
Originally Posted by cordelli
Because the space of the card slot is needed for other things like a bigger battery. Apple wanted to do without a SIM slot on the new iphone for space savings, but the providers talked them out of it (going to a virtual sim instead)
I should have said microSD. You're correct that space is at a premium, but a microSD card is 11x15x1 mm. It wouldn't be taking up much space.
mooper is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 10:14 am
  #66  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium, IHG Diamond, United Silver
Posts: 16,896
I'm still trying to figure out why I can't install apps on the microSD card in my GS3.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 10:47 am
  #67  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Easton, CT, USA
Programs: ua prem exec, Former hilton diamond
Posts: 31,801
Originally Posted by mooper
I should have said microSD. You're correct that space is at a premium, but a microSD card is 11x15x1 mm. It wouldn't be taking up much space.
That's what I thought too, but apparently even the nano sim slot in the new iphone was an issue. I would guess it also alters the strength of the case. though they could just be cheap and not wanting to spend the cost to put them in.
cordelli is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 11:28 am
  #68  
jfe
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Paso, TX, USA
Programs: Kicked out of all of them
Posts: 32,554
Originally Posted by RichMSN
I'm still trying to figure out why I can't install apps on the microSD card in my GS3.
You are running out of space?

I have 150 apps, and don't have the need for that
jfe is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 11:41 am
  #69  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium, IHG Diamond, United Silver
Posts: 16,896
Originally Posted by jfe
You are running out of space?

I have 150 apps, and don't have the need for that
Need isn't the point. I should be able to put the apps wherever I want.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 11:52 am
  #70  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
Originally Posted by RichMSN
I'm still trying to figure out why I can't install apps on the microSD card in my GS3.
There's an app for that.

DirectoryBind
SRQ Guy is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 12:35 pm
  #71  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,292
Originally Posted by RichMSN
Need isn't the point. I should be able to put the apps wherever I want.
I agree - very Applesque of them to try to protect you by requiring apps to be where they want rather than where you want. On the other hand, given that onboard memory is more than sufficient to hold thousands of apps, I'm curious what you're gaining by moving them to the removable card anyway. How much space are they taking up in total?
mooper is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 12:59 pm
  #72  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
2M
100 Nights
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium, IHG Diamond, United Silver
Posts: 16,896
Originally Posted by mooper
I agree - very Applesque of them to try to protect you by requiring apps to be where they want rather than where you want. On the other hand, given that onboard memory is more than sufficient to hold thousands of apps, I'm curious what you're gaining by moving them to the removable card anyway. How much space are they taking up in total?
It's not the point. I would like to keep as much onboard free space as possible. I can't do that with arbitrary rules in place.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 2:06 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: Flying Blue Gold and Virgin America for a few months
Posts: 507
I wish someone would make a form-fitting card reader, USB port etc for these tabs ,
it just needs to follow the contour of the side of the tablet , then it cannot get damaged,

the one Apple sells and are made for my Samsung Tab just gets in the way.

Soarer
soarer is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 2:22 pm
  #74  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,292
Originally Posted by RichMSN
It's not the point. I would like to keep as much onboard free space as possible. I can't do that with arbitrary rules in place.
It's not arbitrary; they are trying to make the device more reliable, but again, I agree with you that they should give you the choice. At the very most, they should pop a warning that your device will be less stable if you save to removable memory, then allow you do to it if you wish. I'm just curious how much damage is done by prohibiting your preference. If you'd gain a third of a GB out of 16GB available, it's less of an issue than if you're losing 4GB.
mooper is offline  
Old Oct 9, 2012 | 3:17 pm
  #75  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,784
Originally Posted by richarddd
Plug in external storage, copy files to tablet, unplug external storage.
Sure, although you're missing the step of "delete something off the tablet to make space first." It works, but it's a lot less convenient than just having the storage internal in the first place.

(For that matter, most of the file managers for Android are pretty terrible; ghost commander is the last bad I've found, and that's not saying much.)

Originally Posted by mooper
but given the negligible cost, why not provide those who might differ the option?
If you're Apple, it's because it's much more profitable to sell larger space at a premium of $2-$3/gb than it is to let people pay $0.50/gb for an SD card.

If you're Google and not making your main money from hardware, it's rather inexplicable.

Originally Posted by cordelli
Because the space of the card slot is needed for other things like a bigger battery. Apple wanted to do without a SIM slot on the new iphone for space savings, but the providers talked them out of it (going to a virtual sim instead)
That makes sense on a phone as compact as the iPhone 4+, although clearly Samsung and others make it work with their larger phones -- not every company is as obsessed with thinning down as Apple.

For a 7" tablet, that does not hold any water; the MicroSD slot takes very little space relative to the larger footprint of the tablet.
nkedel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.