CES 2012: D-Link DIR-505 Wireless N travel router + USB charger
#31
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: BA GGL, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,314
#32
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 6,912
The older ones did 100-240, I would have a hard time thinking they would
A: step back from a previous spec
B: make a TRAVEL router that required a second power convertor.
I'll be very surprised if they produce something that is either 110 or 220 only.
A: step back from a previous spec
B: make a TRAVEL router that required a second power convertor.
I'll be very surprised if they produce something that is either 110 or 220 only.
#33
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Body in Downtown YYZ, heart and mind elsewhere
Programs: UA 50K, refugee from AC E50K, Marriott Lifetime Plat
Posts: 5,132
For any portable device, universal voltage can't possibly be that hard nor that expensive to build in. A uni-voltage microwave oven? Sure. A travel router? Can't see it as it just doesn't make good business sense.
Then again, the same could be said of folding plugs ...
#34
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
I've soured on Internet from hotels. Often overpriced and underperforming.
I guess if you're traveling on business and the company picks up the tab, a travel router can make sense.
But for international leisure travel, unless you're staying at a big chain (and even then), it seems a Mifi would be more useful, often better speeds too.
Once, I stayed at a nice hotel in Sorrento which only had ethernet but they just handed you an Airport Express. Well the ethernet happened to be behind this little armoire that had a nice table for holding the MacBook Pro so I didn't bother with the Airport Express.
But Internet was free so it was okay. I think Mifi, especially in Italy, is more useful because prepaid data is so affordable and the networks are fast. You can tell use the Mifi with a smart phone when you're out for the day and at night in the hotel room.
I guess if you're traveling on business and the company picks up the tab, a travel router can make sense.
But for international leisure travel, unless you're staying at a big chain (and even then), it seems a Mifi would be more useful, often better speeds too.
Once, I stayed at a nice hotel in Sorrento which only had ethernet but they just handed you an Airport Express. Well the ethernet happened to be behind this little armoire that had a nice table for holding the MacBook Pro so I didn't bother with the Airport Express.
But Internet was free so it was okay. I think Mifi, especially in Italy, is more useful because prepaid data is so affordable and the networks are fast. You can tell use the Mifi with a smart phone when you're out for the day and at night in the hotel room.
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
As for your wireless charging thing, there are people working on that. Inductive charging is the first step. http://powermat.com/ You put a special adapter on your phone, and you set it on a special mat. The mat is connected to power, but you never have to plug your phone into anything, just set it on the mat. I've seen a few stories about other companies showing these off at CES.
#37
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 6,912
Indeed portable internet through broadband is great. One clear issue though is that often in a hotel room the windows are double paned for sound proofing and with 4G broadband at least that can make the 4G connection essentially useless. Most 4G companies will tell you that a well sound proofed and double paned window can kill or cancel much of the connection. I've often had to try and open a window or put the device strategically in between windows or edge of the wall in order to even get a connection.
#38
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
I thought LTE was using some longer wavelengths. Either Verizon or AT&T is around 700 Mhz and one of the bands supported in Europe will be 800 Mhz.
Those are suppose to penetrate buildings better than higher wavelengths like 1800 Mhz.
Interoperability will be more of an issue with LTE, which supports more bands than UMTS. Verizon and AT&T will try to prevent LTE devices from being interoperable on each other's networks.
It'll be interesting what Apple does with LTE. They have the clout to tell these carriers to get bent and they'd be interested in one SKU for both networks and the world but if their LTE networks don't have overlapping spectrum or the LTE base bands doesn't support enough bands, we may go back to 2 sets of SKUs.
Those are suppose to penetrate buildings better than higher wavelengths like 1800 Mhz.
Interoperability will be more of an issue with LTE, which supports more bands than UMTS. Verizon and AT&T will try to prevent LTE devices from being interoperable on each other's networks.
It'll be interesting what Apple does with LTE. They have the clout to tell these carriers to get bent and they'd be interested in one SKU for both networks and the world but if their LTE networks don't have overlapping spectrum or the LTE base bands doesn't support enough bands, we may go back to 2 sets of SKUs.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
I thought LTE was using some longer wavelengths. Either Verizon or AT&T is around 700 Mhz and one of the bands supported in Europe will be 800 Mhz.
Those are suppose to penetrate buildings better than higher wavelengths like 1800 Mhz.
Interoperability will be more of an issue with LTE, which supports more bands than UMTS. Verizon and AT&T will try to prevent LTE devices from being interoperable on each other's networks.
It'll be interesting what Apple does with LTE. They have the clout to tell these carriers to get bent and they'd be interested in one SKU for both networks and the world but if their LTE networks don't have overlapping spectrum or the LTE base bands doesn't support enough bands, we may go back to 2 sets of SKUs.
Those are suppose to penetrate buildings better than higher wavelengths like 1800 Mhz.
Interoperability will be more of an issue with LTE, which supports more bands than UMTS. Verizon and AT&T will try to prevent LTE devices from being interoperable on each other's networks.
It'll be interesting what Apple does with LTE. They have the clout to tell these carriers to get bent and they'd be interested in one SKU for both networks and the world but if their LTE networks don't have overlapping spectrum or the LTE base bands doesn't support enough bands, we may go back to 2 sets of SKUs.
#40
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
But I maintain that, far more important in an urban environment is the proximity to the nearest cell tower.
#41
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 6,912
Indeed with wider band LTE or 4G frequencies you shouldn't experience this but even with 1800-1900 4G I think one will.
The high freq companies like Clear and legacy Sprint devices and I believe older embedded intel systems will be in the Higher frequency ranges. And most of european mobile broadband spectrum allocated for wireless broadband is in the higher frequency ranges I believe.
The high freq companies like Clear and legacy Sprint devices and I believe older embedded intel systems will be in the Higher frequency ranges. And most of european mobile broadband spectrum allocated for wireless broadband is in the higher frequency ranges I believe.
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Indeed with wider band LTE or 4G frequencies you shouldn't experience this but even with 1800-1900 4G I think one will.
The high freq companies like Clear and legacy Sprint devices and I believe older embedded intel systems will be in the Higher frequency ranges. And most of european mobile broadband spectrum allocated for wireless broadband is in the higher frequency ranges I believe.
The high freq companies like Clear and legacy Sprint devices and I believe older embedded intel systems will be in the Higher frequency ranges. And most of european mobile broadband spectrum allocated for wireless broadband is in the higher frequency ranges I believe.
#44
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP, Hhonors Gold, National Executive, Identity Gold, MLife Gold
Posts: 2,687
#45
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,156
Datasheet has been updated and it is indeed 110-240 volts!
Previously I would have said the WL-330GE was a much better deal at their usual $15-30, but they seem to be EOL now and the replacement WL-330N/WL-330N3G are $50+ which levels things out a bit...