Actually WiFi CAN interfere with the avionics
Mar 9, 2011 | 6:18 pm
#1
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Actually WiFi CAN interfere with the avionics
Chalk this one up under the YIKES! column. It is not the basic end-user wifi signal that is causing problems but there are confirmed reports that the equipment may cause problems with some display units in the cockpit:
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/ru...rms-wi-fi.html
Boeing has confirmed that "blanking" of Honeywell Phase 3 Display Units (DUs) has been reported during airline EMI (electro magnetic interference) certification testing of wireless broadband systems (Wi-Fi) on various Boeing737NG airplanes.
Boeing, meanwhile, says: "Current testing by Boeing and Honeywell has determined that blanking may occur when a DU is subjected to testing procedures specified by the FAA requirements (AC-20-164) during installations of Wi-Fi systems on the airplane. Based on testing that has been conducted, Boeing and Honeywell have concluded that actual EMI levels experienced during normal operation of typical passenger Wi-Fi systems would not cause any blanking of the Phase 3 DU. This issue does not exist with the Phase 1 or 2 DU's."
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/ru...rms-wi-fi.html
Mar 9, 2011 | 6:57 pm
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
That sounds more like bad shielding on this specific product. If it can be disrupted in the air just by Wi-Fi signals, it probably wouldn't pass basic ground testing for electronics either.
I'd say back to the drawing board for them...
I'd say back to the drawing board for them...
Mar 9, 2011 | 9:27 pm
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
Ummm..... doesn't this quote from your link seem to disprove your thread title?
Boeing and Honeywell have concluded that actual EMI levels experienced during normal operation of typical passenger Wi-Fi systems would not cause any blanking of the Phase 3 DU.
Mar 14, 2011 | 6:16 am
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,682
Wait, all the "experts" on FT told us this was impossible, and that the FAA didn't know what they were talking about (even in conversations about phones, which is an FCC restriction) and how they leave their electronics on all the time without worry because aircraft electronics are so well shielded they could never be affected.
Mar 14, 2011 | 7:42 am
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
Wait, all the "experts" on FT told us this was impossible, and that the FAA didn't know what they were talking about (even in conversations about phones, which is an FCC restriction) and how they leave their electronics on all the time without worry because aircraft electronics are so well shielded they could never be affected.
LOL
And if YOU actually read the report you will see that all the "experts" on FT are still correct.
Mar 16, 2011 | 8:41 pm
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Sep 24, 2013 | 10:18 am
#9
Flyertalk Posting Legend Moderator: Credit Card Programs, American Express, Capital One, Chase, Citi, Diners Club, Eco Travel, Signatures
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami, Mpls & London
Programs: AA, IHG & Marriott Platinum; DL & HH Gold
Posts: 51,889
WSJ: FAA Moves Toward Mandatory Replacement of Certain Honeywell Displays
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...063260030.html
The Federal Aviation Administration moved toward mandatory replacement of certain older Honeywell International Inc. pilot displays installed on more than 150 Boeing Co. 737s and 777s flown by U.S. carriers, raising new concerns about susceptibility to interference from Wi-Fi signals.
Sep 24, 2013 | 11:11 pm
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 28,776
Wait, all the "experts" on FT told us this was impossible, and that the FAA didn't know what they were talking about (even in conversations about phones, which is an FCC restriction) and how they leave their electronics on all the time without worry because aircraft electronics are so well shielded they could never be affected.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/todayi...tions/2854521/