Community
Wiki Posts
Search

New iPod models

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 1:22 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
New iPod models

Love the iPod Touch upgrade (and ordered some). iPod Nano is interesting, but looks like it may have some usability issues. Also, a shame it doesn't do apps.

iPod Shuffle looks like Apple admitted defeat on the previous Shuffle...

AppleTV priced right, but relies too much on online/paid content for my taste. It has poor offline codec support, so I can't use the majority of my local stuff.

Still, some real winners in that lineup - as usual.
ScottC is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 1:25 pm
  #2  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: BRU (SEA, JNB)
Programs: Mucci Reperateur des Coeurs Brises
Posts: 4,120
No upgrade on the iPod classic? A little thinner with more capacity? Shame.
SchmeckFlyer is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 1:28 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by SchmeckFlyer
No upgrade on the iPod classic? A little thinner with more capacity? Shame.
I know

It is like HDD models have all been abandoned. At least they didn't cancel it, but I'd pay for a 160GB iPod Touch.
ScottC is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 1:34 pm
  #4  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: BRU (SEA, JNB)
Programs: Mucci Reperateur des Coeurs Brises
Posts: 4,120
I prefer the buttons to a touchscreen for an mp3 player, so I'd rather have a leaner Classic than a bigger iTouch. I don't need the bigger screen to watch movies, as I find such an exercise ridiculous on such a minuscule screen. I like being able to control the music without removing the iPod from my pocket. And I like the big capacity, as I'm able to use it as a mobile hard drive while being able to keep all my music/photos on the same drive.
SchmeckFlyer is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 3:09 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
New iPods

Touch screen nano, touch with most of the iphone4 features except GPS

Torygraph

Pity no GPS as it's the one feature that I could really do with on a touch as it would make lots of iphone apps usable. Don't really give a damn about making phone or video calls over the net

And when will they make iTunes into good software rather than something you have no option but to use
alanR is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 3:16 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
I'd love the new touch if they'd stuck GPS into it rather than two cameras. I have more need for GPS than the ability to send low quality piccies around the world
alanR is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 6:11 pm
  #7  
2M
50 Countries Visited
5M
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 7,174
I really wish the ipod touch had a better camera, like the iphone 4. Sort of a bummer they didn't upgrade it too.
nmenaker is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 6:51 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by nmenaker
I really wish the ipod touch had a better camera, like the iphone 4. Sort of a bummer they didn't upgrade it too.
Weird eh - it does HD video, but only VGA quality photos. Like they crippled it on purpose...
ScottC is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 6:54 pm
  #9  
2M
50 Countries Visited
5M
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA 1MM 0P, AA, DL, *wood, Lifetime FPC Plat., IHG, HHD
Posts: 7,174
Yeah maybe. I heard that the camera is just to big. Has too much depth to fit in the very slim form factor of the iPod touch.
nmenaker is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 5:46 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,605
Originally Posted by ScottC
Weird eh - it does HD video, but only VGA quality photos. Like they crippled it on purpose...
They've got to keep something back to put in the next version - they could string it out for years with better cameras, adding a compass, adding GPS, camera flash...

or perhaps they are just hoping people will buy an iphone instead so they can make more money from the MacOlytes as they seem to be aiming this straight at the touchy-feely, OK Yah fluffheads to whom social networking is the reason for life, the universe and everything
alanR is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 6:29 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Mileage Plus, Skymiles, EleVAte founding member, SPG
Posts: 1,910
Originally Posted by alanR
OK Yah fluffheads to whom social networking is the reason for life, the universe and everything
Unlike us who use Flyertalk as social networking 'lite'.
wiredboy10003 is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 9:20 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Programs: Lifetime AA Gold-1MM
Posts: 4,909
Originally Posted by alanR

Pity no GPS as it's the one feature that I could really do with on a touch as it would make lots of iphone apps usable.
I totally agree, the new features are not enough to get me to upgrade, I want GPS functionality in my iPod Touch.
BLI-Flyer is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 10:29 am
  #13  
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
I've merged the two "new iPod" threads as a second one was started a few hours after this one.
ScottC is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 11:05 am
  #14  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: United MileagePlus Silver, Nexus, Global Entry
Posts: 8,810
Originally Posted by SchmeckFlyer
No upgrade on the iPod classic? A little thinner with more capacity? Shame.
Unlike nanos, touches, shuffles and their ilk, the 'classics' have hard drives in them...

http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.co...probably/1492/

...that both allows their large capacity but also limits how 'thin' they can go.
gglave is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 11:13 pm
  #15  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SYD
Posts: 1,466
Originally Posted by ScottC
Still, some real winners in that lineup - as usual.
I remember the good old days when iPod was Apple's halo product and the speculation threads on FT would run into the hundreds of posts before each new release.

My first iPod was an original Mini, then the original Nano and finally the original Touch.

While there have been quite a few enhancements in this announcement there just isn't a wow-factor or killer feature to compel me to upgrade.
Coathanger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.