Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Technology
Reload this Page >

firefox sync! (add-on)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

firefox sync! (add-on)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 3:01 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,708
firefox sync! (add-on)

Store your firefox bookmarks, history, passwords, tabs in the cloud, and share them between your computers and mobile devices.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/10868/

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/sync/

Your account gets a password, your data gets encrypted with a separate pass key.

Last edited by LIH Prem; Jul 20, 2010 at 3:23 am
LIH Prem is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 8:10 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,771
I've been using Xmarks for a long time to do all this. It's also a free Firefox addon.
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 8:16 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
I've been using this for years (when it was still called Mozilla Weave) - absolutely my favorite extension. Any time I get a new laptop, I install Firefox, Sync and in 5 minutes I have all my passwords, bookmarks and more. Only wish it could do extension syncs...
ScottC is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 8:18 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,771
When it syncs, does it slow down Firefox to a crawl? Xmarks has gotten a lot better but still is noticeable.
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 8:24 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited3M100 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: BA, AA, DL, KLM, UA
Posts: 37,489
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
When it syncs, does it slow down Firefox to a crawl? Xmarks has gotten a lot better but still is noticeable.
It *used* to, but now it really does run smoothly in the background. Depending on the size of history and password files, the initial sync can take about 10 minutes.
ScottC is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 8:54 am
  #6  
5M
100 Nights
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London
Programs: AA EXP, SPG Plt
Posts: 2,613
I wish there were extensions for other browsers. Given the speed of Chrome I can't go Firefox only anymore. Maybe 3 years ago...
BobbySteel is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 3:26 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,543
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
I've been using Xmarks for a long time to do all this. It's also a free Firefox addon.
Yup. A little laggy at times but generally quite good. I think the lag problem is inherent to Firefox--it seems that something about opening a connection can sometimes block all of Firefox. You get the same thing sometimes loading a web page. (IE is even worse about it.)
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 8:38 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Upcountry Maui, HI
Posts: 13,708
Originally Posted by gfunkdave
When it syncs, does it slow down Firefox to a crawl? Xmarks has gotten a lot better but still is noticeable.
I didn't notice it at all, and I just installed it on two laptops. (and didn't use xmarks or earlier versions of sync.)

-David
LIH Prem is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2010 | 10:23 pm
  #9  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: San Jose, California, USA
Programs: AS Plat, UA MM, AA MM, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,167
The nice thing about xmarks (which I started using back when it was called foxmarks) is that it synchronizes bookmarks & passwords across multiple browsers, including Chrome and Safari.

It's really nice to have one set of bookmarks across all my Firefox installations (as well as IE, which I am forced to use for work).
mikew99 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 8:50 pm
  #10  
1M
40 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA Plat & 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 8,687
Originally Posted by mikew99
The nice thing about xmarks (which I started using back when it was called foxmarks) is that it synchronizes bookmarks & passwords across multiple browsers, including Chrome and Safari.

It's really nice to have one set of bookmarks across all my Firefox installations (as well as IE, which I am forced to use for work).
Agree. I've never had a slowness issue with xmarks. If it's a problem, turn off automatic syncing.
drewguy is online now  
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 7:01 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York
Programs: UA, Starwood, Marriott, Hyatt. RewardsNetwork dining.
Posts: 210
XMarks vs. FireFox Sync (formerly Mozilla Weave)

I'm trying to decide whether to set up XMarks, or Firefox Sync.
Looking over their features, it seems like the differences are:

XMarks:
  • syncs multiple browsers (IE, Safari etc.)
  • profiles
  • share sets of bookmarks with others
  • some Discovery features not really related to syncing (search keyword hints, site stats, etc.)

Firefox Sync:
  • live tab syncing
  • naming for different computers
  • native to Firefox
  • extension/add-on capability in development

Any other comments on which has the advantage?
BonnieSEA is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 7:09 pm
  #12  
In Memoriam
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,111
I can only say that I've been very happy with Xmarks, and have been using it since it was Foxmarks. I've rarely experienced any slowdown, and I love how much it indeed synchronizes (including most autofill fields).
cblaisd is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2010 | 7:32 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,186
Originally Posted by BonnieSEA
I'm trying to decide whether to set up XMarks, or Firefox Sync.
Looking over their features, it seems like the differences are:

XMarks:
  • syncs multiple browsers (IE, Safari etc.)
  • profiles
  • share sets of bookmarks with others
  • some Discovery features not really related to syncing (search keyword hints, site stats, etc.)

Firefox Sync:
  • live tab syncing
  • naming for different computers
  • native to Firefox
  • extension/add-on capability in development

Any other comments on which has the advantage?
XMarks includes Live Tab Syncing too.
Dodge DeBoulet is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 2:43 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,771
I've been using Xmarks since it was Foxmarks. It has improved much since then. It no longer slows Firefox to a crawl when syncing, for example. I use it for bookmarks and password sync/backup.
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 6:08 pm
  #15  
mjm
Original Member
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
2M
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Tokyo, Japan (or Vienna whenever possible)
Posts: 6,978
May be a silly question but where is all the data that is synched stored? If it is not resident on your computer over which you have control is it not a HUGE potential security breach to store passwords elsewhere?

Hoping I am misunderstanding.......

Thanks in advance from a "just had my first cup of coffee for the day" Mike
mjm is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.