Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Kid/age cutoff in F on DL...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2011, 6:39 pm
  #46  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,403
Originally Posted by Sez_Who
That word "right" sure opens a can of worms. What happens, for example, when you are on a redeye trying to sleep and a couple other pax who also paid for F want to talk. Do they have right to do so even if it interrupts your right to sleep?

Think I understand what you are saying but fact is, the tube has 100+ pax who each feel they have certain rights. Don't know what kind of Bose headphones you have but my QC-15's are pretty good at drowning out much of the noise I choose not to hear. Sure, sometimes they will not eliminate all the noise from a wailing infant (even from six rows away) but I take solace that I won't have to hear it after maybe a few hours while the parents have to hear it all the time.
Couple things with that scenario. The two people having the conversation are PAYING for the seat, unlike the infant. When I was on the DTW/SFO flight in June, I couldn't sleep even with the QC Headphones on (which are the same as yours). If it's two people talking, I won't have the risk of sitting next to them obviously and the QC's should block the noise out. If they are talking at such a loud level I can hear them several rows away with the QC's on, I won't hesitate to ask them to please be a little more considerate or ask the FA to ask them. Hard to tell an infant to keep it down on a flight
jamesteroh is offline  
Old Dec 26, 2011, 6:43 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 280
Originally Posted by javabytes
Bad behavior has no age limits.

And there's very little about domestic F (on any airline) that is really first class. It's basically upgrade class.
After reading the first page... javabytes has successfully determined the outcome of this discussion. End thread!
paramount is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2011, 9:25 am
  #48  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ORD
Programs: 2015 kettle
Posts: 653
Originally Posted by BearX220
The preceding is absolutely, unequivocally untrue.



What a bizarre thing to say. I would prefer to sit next to any infant, operating at any decibel level, over someone who thinks these sorts of things.

In before the lock.
Agree 100% Wow.....Mother thinks flying with an infant is child abuse and that it is narcism to travel with children? That is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. How about parents that are divorced and live in separate states? Or ones that have sick children and need to fly to a specialist? Sometimes, there are reasons for things and we all need to take our heads out of our bums and realize the world doesn't revolve around us. Get off the high horse and deal with things without complaining for one day! Get a grip, people (rant over).
mickeydfly13 is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2011, 10:21 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BDL/HPN/JFK/FLL
Programs: DL Diamond Ham Sandwich
Posts: 1,051
Seriously. You people have spent an entire page putting words in my mouth and not even trying to read and comprehend what it was I wrote when this thread was in a different forum.

Now it's basically ad hominem attacks against me for things I didn't say.

This thread should have died long ago...

Last edited by mother-; Dec 27, 2011 at 10:32 am
mother- is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2011, 10:36 am
  #50  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,748
Originally Posted by mother-
And while I understand the need to take infants on planes sometimes, it SUCKS for everyone and is pretty close to child abuse. So people that regularly take infants on board are by definition narcissists of the first order. Stay home until they are old enough to say "Mommy my ears hurt" unless there is an emergency. And if they start screaming get up and go somewhere that will minimize the agony to your fellow passengers, we did nothing to deserve having to listen to 120db of tortured baby screams...
Come out of your cocoon and learn what child abuse really is before you start using that term to describe travel by air. Look around the world and you'll see kids beaten, raped, starved, denied basic care: that's child abuse.

The statement that taking an infant on a plane "is pretty close to child abuse" is so wrong and so offensive that you owe an apology to every parent who has ever flown with a child. The rest of the drivel you wrote just adds to offensiveness; people who need to travel with a child, even on a regular basis, are people going about the business of their lives and dealing with a thousand and one issues of which you have no knowledge at all, getting on with one's life does not make one a "narcissist[s] of the first order" even if you might occasionally have to listen to a crying baby.

Originally Posted by mother-
Seriously. You people have spent an entire page putting words in my mouth and not even trying to read and comprehend what it was I wrote when this thread was in a different forum.

Now it's basically ad hominem attacks against me for things I didn't say.
There's nothing wrong with the reading comprehension skills of those responding to you, or are you suggesting that you didn't write the posts appearing here under your name?
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2011, 10:47 am
  #51  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: France
Programs: United Plus
Posts: 1,761
I think we can read and comprehend just fine. While you have a right to your opinion, if you judge people, expect them to respond. Also others have jumped in so it's not necessarily what YOU said...

Just to clarify some misinformation that has popped up.

I don't believe that there is any airline which restricts children from any class of service. Someone did post here with a rumour that Malaysian did but this was false.

It IS true that the airlines have age restrictions for their own employees' children. I flew with two airlines and it was high, 8 and 10 years old to sit up there. So that baby crying belongs to a "real" passenger.

Babies end up in pain from the pressurization and they don't understand it and can't cope with it.

This is a common myth. I've been flying with mine since each was 4 months old and they never had any ear problems. I also never forced them to suck on anything (usually keeping them safetly strapped into their car seats and often asleep). Babies often cryin when the a/c kicks in after take-off. As a Flight Attendant, I rarely saw babies with ear problems. Only if they're flying with an ear infection are they bothered (and that can be painful!). Healthy ears, in adults or children, can handle pressurization changes.
Eclipsepearl is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2011, 11:43 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,872
Originally Posted by mother-
Seriously. You people have spent an entire page putting words in my mouth and not even trying to read and comprehend what it was I wrote when this thread was in a different forum.

Now it's basically ad hominem attacks against me for things I didn't say.
Really? You didn't say:

Originally Posted by mother-
And while I understand the need to take infants on planes sometimes, it SUCKS for everyone and is pretty close to child abuse. So people that regularly take infants on board are by definition narcissists of the first order. Stay home until they are old enough to say "Mommy my ears hurt" unless there is an emergency. And if they start screaming get up and go somewhere that will minimize the agony to your fellow passengers, we did nothing to deserve having to listen to 120db of tortured baby screams...
So you are saying that parents who travel with infants should not take umbrage at being painted with the broad brush of being virtual child abusers and narcissists? Kind of tough to do.
Flyingmama is offline  
Old Dec 27, 2011, 12:58 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K | AA Platinum | SPG Platinum | HHonors Gold | Marriott Gold | National Executive
Posts: 10
Being a 1K means that we usually get upgraded, even when reservations indicate lap children (9-month old twins). The babies have been flying since they were 4 months old, including 10 plus hour flights, and are quite accustomed to it. I've had fellow passengers come up to me after the flight, surprised at the fact that they didn't make any noise. Still, when sans children, I am one of those business travelers in a suit in FC with my laptop ready to go (and would appreciate infants a few rows behind, as opposed to next to me). Depending on the flight, we usually ask two fellow flyers sitting in opposing aisle seats in Economy Plus to please trade seats with us in First Class.
ZW4348 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.