Access to CC After Post-Count Reduction
Jan 15, 2008 | 7:25 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: DCA
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium, United Silver
Posts: 590
Access to CC After Post-Count Reduction
FYI ... access restored ...
In advance, I apologize for the somewhat redundant message - I posted a similar message in the Community forum. Wish I could delete ....
Hello - I had been called out for "post-padding" and my post count was reduced below the CC threshold. After being "rehabilitated" and learning my lesson, I have continued to post content that is not "padding" and am currently above 90 posts. This has been the case for several days now, yet I still do not have access to CC.
Any ideas? I have tried logging out and logging back in.
Thanks!
DarkHelmetII
In advance, I apologize for the somewhat redundant message - I posted a similar message in the Community forum. Wish I could delete ....
Hello - I had been called out for "post-padding" and my post count was reduced below the CC threshold. After being "rehabilitated" and learning my lesson, I have continued to post content that is not "padding" and am currently above 90 posts. This has been the case for several days now, yet I still do not have access to CC.
Any ideas? I have tried logging out and logging back in.
Thanks!
DarkHelmetII
Last edited by DarkHelmetII; Jan 16, 2008 at 10:13 am Reason: I am reaizing this post might be a bit redundant ....
Jan 16, 2008 | 1:03 am
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SF CA USA. I love large faceless corporations. And they cherish me in return (sometimes). ;)
Programs: UA Premier Gold/disappointed 1MM, HH Gold, IHG Plat, MB lifetime Gold, BW Diam Sel
Posts: 17,819
Did you try sending a PM to one or more of the Moderators about this?
That might get a quicker answer; not only an answer, but perhaps even a solution of the problem. @:-)
(I saw your lengthy post on this same issue in the "Only Randy Petersen" forum.)
That might get a quicker answer; not only an answer, but perhaps even a solution of the problem. @:-)
(I saw your lengthy post on this same issue in the "Only Randy Petersen" forum.)