Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Threads starting at #2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 2:15 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MSP (and will only fly NWA in re-routes if I HAVE to)
Programs: AA EXP (4.5MM), hotel programs as needed
Posts: 5,800
Threads starting at #2

I had noticed it on other threads .. but here is a simple one. Original post and a couple of replies.

First (original) starts at #2

Any thoughts??

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=755411

And of course this one I just made starts at #1 ... grrrrrr
JGR01 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 3:22 pm
  #2  
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
30 Countries Visited
1M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,220
I just clicked on that link.... and see 3 threads numbered 1, 2, 3.

This is the first post:

Yesterday I was flying from SEA to SNA. Many inbound flights were delayed due to fog in SEA. My flight, the 12:43 to SNA, was shown as at the gate and on time. We boarded at 12:15.

At about 12:30, the flight attendant announces that they were not the crew for this flight, and that the crew was actually still inbound. Attendants from OAK, and pilots from San Jose. We sat on the plane for 1.5 hours before the pilots showed up.

Now, simple question - obviously they knew that, at the time they boarded our plane, the crews were still at least an hour out of SEA. Why in the world would they make us sit on a hot, non-air conditioned plane instead of wait in the terminal? It's not like they had to free up the gate since the plane was going to sit there anyway?

I was in FC, and no beverages were offered (by the stand in crew, or the other attendants who arrived about 15 minutes before the pilots) as we sat and sat...

This was my first time on Alaska. Not a very good first impression of their operations! The attendants were friendly and the pilots apologized for being late, which were nice touches. My gripe is not with the delay, but instead with boarding us when they knew the flight would be delayed by more than an hour.
wharvey is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 4:18 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MSP (and will only fly NWA in re-routes if I HAVE to)
Programs: AA EXP (4.5MM), hotel programs as needed
Posts: 5,800
I did it again .. .and still the first post is listed as #2

Nov 9, 07, 11:12 am #2
1worldtrader


Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: California
Programs: NW Gold, UA, AA, Priority Club Gold, Marriott Rewards Silver,
Posts: 139 Sitting on Plane over 1 hour, no pilots...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday I was flying from SEA to SNA. Many inbound flights were delayed due to fog in SEA. My flight, the 12:43 to SNA, was shown as at the gate and on time. We boarded at 12:15.

At about 12:30, the flight attendant announces that they were not the crew for this flight, and that the crew was actually still inbound. Attendants from OAK, and pilots from San Jose. We sat on the plane for 1.5 hours before the pilots showed up.

.....
JGR01 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 4:58 pm
  #4  
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
30 Countries Visited
1M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,220
That is really strange... that is post #1 for me...
wharvey is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.