Proposal: Allow members to remove their IDs and expunge all associated posts.
#46
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,930
You can expunge any of your posts right now -- as long as they are not in a thread which was locked.
#47
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The People's Republik of MSN
Programs: After years of status, back to Peon levels. Anti-Apostheid Platinum, PWP CentCom
Posts: 4,767
I think that this is a very bad idea.
Knowing that I can expunge posts and nic takes away any accountability that might be needed. I can post anything, good or bad, knowing that I can delete my nic and expunge that post.
Members need to think about what their posts can do "UP FRONT" This way we stay honest and accountable!
Knowing that I can expunge posts and nic takes away any accountability that might be needed. I can post anything, good or bad, knowing that I can delete my nic and expunge that post.
Members need to think about what their posts can do "UP FRONT" This way we stay honest and accountable!
Come to it, OMNI is about !
Here's a point to consider. Reputable social networking sites (like Facebook) allow you to completely delete yourself from their service. Not only are you deleted from public view but (so they say) also completely wiped from their servers. I haven't researched, but I'd assume LinkedIn is similar.
As I noted in my post in ORP, sites like Facebook put you in control of what information you choose to make public or private. We don't even have that here. It's all or nothing, and Randy changed the rules in the middle of the game.
Honesty and accountability are a two way street, and Randy's made a unilateral decision that IMO is a material breach of trust with the community.
Lots of people made posts in OMNI thinking that they were not going to be publicly viewable (despite people (RP included) bringing up that OMNI used to be an open forum back in the day, it spent a long time closed, and until it re-opened a few months back, we had every indication Randy was going to stick to the 180/180 rule). Then we got a real kick in the teeth by him further opening OMNI up to Google. Again, as I mentioned over in ORP, people were more open in OMNI because it was a semi-private club. Maybe not quite the sanctity of a confessional, but people let their hair down a little when they're pretty sure the general public can't just wander by.
At the very least, members should be allowed a way to expunge OMNI posts from the roughly 5-year time frame when it was a semi-private forum. Further, there should be a simple way to do it, as opposed to manually expunging posts one-by-one.
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador: World of Hyatt
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Fairmont Lifetime Plat, UA Silver, dirt elsewhere
Posts: 46,919
FWIW - I have spent several hours searching and editing my posts with personal information in them. Not that it was that personal, but my body of posts when looked at together, could easily have painted a pretty good pic ture of my personal information.
I've also essentially stopped posting anywhere on FT. I'm waiting until Randy gives us the answer he promised back in Oct when he opened Omni to google searches.
I've also essentially stopped posting anywhere on FT. I'm waiting until Randy gives us the answer he promised back in Oct when he opened Omni to google searches.
#49
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,930
I have posted a lot of personal information about me -- including my full name and address -- not only on Omni but on some forums which were always open.
When there was something which I didn't care about the whole world knowing, I simply did not post it here or anywhere else. Hence, I would not be deleting any of my posts.
That said, I do think it is only right that if a member wants to delete any of his posts (or even his full body of posts) he should be allowed to do so.
When there was something which I didn't care about the whole world knowing, I simply did not post it here or anywhere else. Hence, I would not be deleting any of my posts.
That said, I do think it is only right that if a member wants to delete any of his posts (or even his full body of posts) he should be allowed to do so.
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: America's Finest City
Posts: 10,936
deleted
Last edited by LLM; Dec 16, 2008 at 11:12 pm
#51
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,930
Which you surely know is very tedious. I've already spent many hours and have literally days to go, a real holiday gift from RP. Look at folks who trustingly posted they don't lock their doors and elsewhere share their travel schedules and then find it is open to Google! As Mary23 notes, tracking down personal info to get it off Google is no small task.
That said, I am intrigued by one thing: Why would you (or anyone else) post things on FlyerTalk that you wouldn't want the whole world to see? Even on a closed board, such as Omni was, you really don't know who the majority of posters are.
Someone posting under an anonymous user name can be anything from a latter day Mother Teresa to a new incarnation of Jack the Ripper.
#52
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,725
A potential employer or client was unlikely to join FT, wait 180 days, and accumulate 180 posts, to see what someone posted to Omni. The same potential employer or client definitely might plug a name or some identifying information into google and see what comes up.
While FTers don't know most other FTers personally, if the potential employer or client was already a 180/180 member of FT, they are also part of the "club" and less likely to take posts out of context, so it's less likely to be an issue.
#53
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: He who dies with the most miles wins!!
Programs: WorldPerks Demoted again to SE, DL 3.1MM Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 11,674
Lots of people made posts in OMNI thinking that they were not going to be publicly viewable (despite people (RP included) bringing up that OMNI used to be an open forum back in the day, it spent a long time closed, and until it re-opened a few months back, we had every indication Randy was going to stick to the 180/180 rule). Then we got a real kick in the teeth by him further opening OMNI up to Google. Again, as I mentioned over in ORP, people were more open in OMNI because it was a semi-private club. Maybe not quite the sanctity of a confessional, but people let their hair down a little when they're pretty sure the general public can't just wander by.
Nothing posted in the internet is private! I rarely post in OMNI, but who cares? I am sure that enough people reading FT can easily figure out who most of us are.
While I don't agree with Randy for opening OMNI...but for different reasons than some of the posters here expressed. I feel that OMNI is the cesspool of FT and gives FT a bad name. But, FT is Randy's sandbox and until IB changes their mind, he makes the rules and I respect that.
As I stated above, we all need accountability. If we post it we are responsible for it. So, I still think this proposal is a bad idea.
#54
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The People's Republik of MSN
Programs: After years of status, back to Peon levels. Anti-Apostheid Platinum, PWP CentCom
Posts: 4,767
IMHO, that is a load of crap!
Nothing posted in the internet is private! I rarely post in OMNI, but who cares? I am sure that enough people reading FT can easily figure out who most of us are.
While I don't agree with Randy for opening OMNI...but for different reasons than some of the posters here expressed. I feel that OMNI is the cesspool of FT and gives FT a bad name. But, FT is Randy's sandbox and until IB changes their mind, he makes the rules and I respect that.
As I stated above, we all need accountability. If we post it we are responsible for it. So, I still think this proposal is a bad idea.
Nothing posted in the internet is private! I rarely post in OMNI, but who cares? I am sure that enough people reading FT can easily figure out who most of us are.
While I don't agree with Randy for opening OMNI...but for different reasons than some of the posters here expressed. I feel that OMNI is the cesspool of FT and gives FT a bad name. But, FT is Randy's sandbox and until IB changes their mind, he makes the rules and I respect that.
As I stated above, we all need accountability. If we post it we are responsible for it. So, I still think this proposal is a bad idea.
And I don't agree that nothing posted on the internet is private. You probably wouldn't like it if your bank didn't follow its existing rules and decided to make your account info public one day, with no prior notice. Until this October, we were led to believe that the general public (and Google) wouldn't see our posts - Randy was very consistent that there was and would continue to be a post threshold for OMNI access. Randy betrayed that trust. Allowing posters to purge their OMNI history over that time period remedies that breach. Personal accountability has nothing to do with it, aside from Randy being held accountable to the userbase for his about-face.
#55
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,930
That's very true -- but at the same time a potential employer or client is also unlikely to know that you post under the name of "studentff", so a Google search wouldn't help him.
#56
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
Programs: DL: 3.8 MM, Marriott: Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 24,575
Cholula's Bank Balance as of 12/11/08: $1.89
#57
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The People's Republik of MSN
Programs: After years of status, back to Peon levels. Anti-Apostheid Platinum, PWP CentCom
Posts: 4,767
#58
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home
Programs: AA, Delta, UA & thanks to FTers for my PC Gold!
Posts: 7,676
#59
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home
Programs: AA, Delta, UA & thanks to FTers for my PC Gold!
Posts: 7,676
I am not sure those who brought up the issue of accountability really get it.
What folks object is the "google-able" OMNI without informed "consent." Accountability is not at issue here.
What folks object is the "google-able" OMNI without informed "consent." Accountability is not at issue here.
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,330