Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

Voting Ended - Motion Failed: "Formalizing a Friendly Amendment process"

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Voting Ended - Motion Failed: "Formalizing a Friendly Amendment process"

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 11:26 am
  #256  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
Originally Posted by mia
I think TalkBoard should be more concerned about user engagement than with transparency. The number of people who vote in the TalkBoard elections is tiny, and the number who post here is even smaller. I suggest this is because most active FlyerTalk users simply do not see that TalkBoard's decisions are important to their experience with the site.

Engagement and transparency are not mutually exclusive, but threads like this one are unflattering, and I believe this further undermines the board's reputation. In your collective place I would want to keep deliberations private. Use this public forum to solicit public input: ask questions, read answers, seek clarifications, but do not vent. Use your private forum for discussions.
Why? Sunshine laws exist for a reason. We shouldn't be deliberating behind closed doors. I don't see how we could possibly drive more engagement without more transparency.

And, I'll say that, to a certain extent, TB can't drive engagement at all. Folks who want to participate will. Offering others all the opportunties in the world to engage won't make it so. If that makes TB irrelevant, so be it. Maybe it's time to disband the Board?

Last edited by dchristiva; Apr 6, 2015 at 11:45 am
dchristiva is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 11:44 am
  #257  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
30 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 27,014
Originally Posted by mia
I think TalkBoard should be more concerned about user engagement than with transparency. The number of people who vote in the TalkBoard elections is tiny, and the number who post here is even smaller. I suggest this is because most active FlyerTalk users simply do not see that TalkBoard's decisions are important to their experience with the site.

Engagement and transparency are not mutually exclusive, but threads like this one are unflattering, and I believe this further undermines the board's reputation. In your collective place I would want to keep deliberations private. Use this public forum to solicit public input: ask questions, read answers, seek clarifications, but do not vent. Use your private forum for discussions.
+1
obscure2k is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 12:13 pm
  #258  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LHR
Programs: DL DM 2MM, BA Bronze, Various Hotels
Posts: 10,188
Originally Posted by kipper
It's not that I "don't remember there being outrage." I checked the public thread on it. Two people, neither of them TB members, asked for an explanation. Two. As compared to the angst from TB members over this one. It should've been a serious issue then too.

People are busy, and sometimes, things come up. At least MSP was honest about the missed vote. She could've crafted some elaborate story, and who would've questioned it?
Well, I did respond in the public thread after missing that vote. It's the last post in the thread.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...ing-forum.html

I made a mistake, I owned it, knew I could change nothing about what had occurred, and life continued on. There were no personal attacks as I recall. The TB President and I communicated on the issue, I posted an apology in both the public and private forums.
rwoman is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 1:01 pm
  #259  
Moderator, Hertz; FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRK
Programs: Many
Posts: 12,723
Originally Posted by tom911
Do you have any thoughts on this entire topic? Doesn't look like you've posted a single word other than the election results, while other Talk Board members have been posting away. Please feel free to jump in and add your thoughts so others don't monopolize the thread.

I don't really have any thoughts about the topic other than that it was a good motion and would of been helpful. Sometimes, there's a small mistake that could of been changed or a typo that wasn't noticed until after it was motioned. If the TB members and the yes voters agree to the minor change, then what's wrong with that?
jason8612 is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 2:01 pm
  #260  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: LHR- ish
Programs: MUCCI, BA Blue
Posts: 4,295
Originally Posted by CMK10
Do you really think that just because you don't remember there being outrage the last time someone missed a vote that that's a reason there shouldn't be outrage this time? This is a specifically enumerated requirement of a Talkboard member making it a serious issue.

I agree with Kipper. So far as I can see it's a black and white issue - either it is acceptable for TB members (who are in a position to vote) to miss votes or it isn't. The same rule should apply to all TB members all the time.
exilencfc is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 2:24 pm
  #261  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,856
Originally Posted by exilencfc
I agree with Kipper. So far as I can see it's a black and white issue - either it is acceptable for TB members (who are in a position to vote) to miss votes or it isn't. The same rule should apply to all TB members all the time.
But it's obviously unacceptable, it's codified in our written rules that this is an offense that can lead to censure and removal. The fact that there was no outrage last time is not grounds for ignoring it this time.
CMK10 is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 2:34 pm
  #262  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LHR
Programs: DL DM 2MM, BA Bronze, Various Hotels
Posts: 10,188
Originally Posted by exilencfc
I agree with Kipper. So far as I can see it's a black and white issue - either it is acceptable for TB members (who are in a position to vote) to miss votes or it isn't. The same rule should apply to all TB members all the time.
The same guidelines do apply to all TB members.

Per the TalkBoard Guidelines, a TB member would need to miss 3 consecutive votes without notice.

While it is frustrating and annoying to others when someone does not vote without prior notice in the appropriate TB forum thread, missing one vote is not grounds for dismissing someone.

When it happens, I think it's understandable some are going to be frustrated it occurred, especially when it impacts the outcome one way or another. I'd surmise this is partly why the reaction this time has been far greater than when I did so in December 2013.
rwoman is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 3:05 pm
  #263  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Exactly! Saying that missing a vote is missing a vote, regardless of the circumstances, is like saying that there's no difference between great white sharks and guppies. Both are fish, right? Yeah, but most people would see quite a lot of difference.

Similarly, speeding is illegal regardless of the circumstances, but nearly everybody regards speeding on a empty road in the middle of nowhere quite differently from speeding on a busy city street filled with pedestrians. Speeding is speeding, except when it's not.

Missing a vote when the tally is 8-0 is radically different from missing a vote when the tally is 5-3. Anybody who can't understand the difference has intentionally put blinders on. I won't do that.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 4:01 pm
  #264  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 52,790
Originally Posted by bdschobel
We could avoid wasting everyone's time if MSPeconomist would simply tell us how she feels about the original motion on which she failed to vote. I would feel like an idiot if I resubmitted the motion for another vote, and it lost. If that's going to happen, she should let us know now and save us all the trouble of finding out the hard way.

If she still isn't sure, then I give up.

Bruce
Why not just resubmit the motion, especially if MSP will vote quickly on it? Then, there's a definite pass or fail.
Originally Posted by rwoman
Well, I did respond in the public thread after missing that vote. It's the last post in the thread.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...ing-forum.html

I made a mistake, I owned it, knew I could change nothing about what had occurred, and life continued on. There were no personal attacks as I recall. The TB President and I communicated on the issue, I posted an apology in both the public and private forums.
Yes, you did, and I appreciated it, much like I appreciate MSP's post apologizing for missing this vote.
kipper is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 4:07 pm
  #265  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by kipper
Why not just resubmit the motion, especially if MSP will vote quickly on it? Then, there's a definite pass or fail....
Do you have me on ignore? I answer your questions and then you ask them again as if you haven't seen my answers. I don't get it. Take me off ignore and read my posts. Then you won't ask me the same questions again and again and again.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 4:14 pm
  #266  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Formerly HPN, but then DCA and IAD for a while, and now back to HPN!
Programs: Honestly, I've been out of the travel game so long that I'm not even sure. Maybe Marriott Gold?
Posts: 10,677
Originally Posted by kipper
Why not just resubmit the motion, especially if MSP will vote quickly on it? Then, there's a definite pass or fail.

Yes, you did, and I appreciated it, much like I appreciate MSP's post apologizing for missing this vote.
Um, have you seen the track record here? Voting "quickly" has not been the habit. Maybe this will be the time, though, so let's go for it!
dchristiva is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 4:24 pm
  #267  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 57,042
Originally Posted by rwoman
When it happens, I think it's understandable some are going to be frustrated it occurred, especially when it impacts the outcome one way or another. I'd surmise this is partly why the reaction this time has been far greater than when I did so in December 2013.
Could be. Could also be that this reaction is an extension of the personality conflict we've seen played out on these pages in past months.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 6:30 pm
  #268  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Nights
50 Countries Visited
5M
Conversation Starter
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in VIENNA, AUSTRIA!
Posts: 61,931
Originally Posted by kipper
Why not just resubmit the motion, especially if MSP will vote quickly on it? Then, there's a definite pass or fail.
Presumably MSPeconomist is still the deciding vote.

She could just state how she would have voted had she voted before falling asleep.

But she didn't in her apology and hasn't since.

I take that to mean she would have voted no or abstain. So the matter is closed.

Unless, you know, MSPeconomist wants to finally publicly take a position on this question.
Originally Posted by tcook052
Could be. Could also be that this reaction is an extension of the personality conflict we've seen played out on these pages in past months.
Yeeeeeeeaaaaaahhhhhhhh.........
kokonutz is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 9:27 pm
  #269  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 52,790
Originally Posted by bdschobel
Do you have me on ignore? I answer your questions and then you ask them again as if you haven't seen my answers. I don't get it. Take me off ignore and read my posts. Then you won't ask me the same questions again and again and again.

Bruce
I don't have you on ignore. I just don't understand why you insist that MSP must answer how she would vote when you can simply just make the motion and have it seconded and vote again. Seems to be less angst to just to that.

Originally Posted by tcook052
Could be. Could also be that this reaction is an extension of the personality conflict we've seen played out on these pages in past months.
It could be.
kipper is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015 | 9:39 pm
  #270  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by kipper
I don't have you on ignore. I just don't understand why you insist that MSP must answer how she would vote when you can simply just make the motion and have it seconded and vote again. Seems to be less angst to just to that.
I stated quite clearly that, before wasting everybody's time running through another 2-week voting cycle, I would like to know how MSPeconomist feels about the motion. Surely she knows by now, right? If she supports it, then revoting is a no-brainer. If she is opposed, then we already have our result, and revoting would not change it.

Can I possibly be any clearer? One person can tell us what to do, but she remains silent. I'm not going to even contemplate revoting until we hear from her. The rest of TalkBoard would impeach me -- and rightfully so!!! (I might impeach myself first.)

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.