Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

Should Premium Fare deals get its own forum?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Oct 25, 2014, 11:02 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: JDiver
Signed in members with 90 days / 90 posts can edit this Wikipost to update; wiki contents may be printed by using the (lower right wiki corner)

The motion to establish a Premium Fare Deals subforum under the Mileage Run Deals forum was passed 23 October 2014. The new forum can be visited here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/premium-fare-deals-740/

Extract from the "Motion Passed: Creation of a Premium Fare Deals subforum" thread:

Motion Passed: Creation of a Premium Fare Deals subforum

Moved by kokonutz and seconded by jason8612:

"The TalkBoard recommends to the Community Director the creation of a subforum called 'Premium Fare Deals' in the Mileage Run Deals forum."

Forum description:

"Discuss specific premium fare code 'good deals' including fare deals that book into premium economy, business and first class cabins. Once any fare expires, the title should be changed to note '[fare expired]'."
Print Wikipost

Should Premium Fare deals get its own forum?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2014, 11:15 am
  #61  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in CUZCO, PERU
Posts: 58,639
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
Btw -we Mau get more input on tues after the quasi US Holliday (columbus day) and Canada thanksgiving/legit holiday.

I hate auto correct

Cheers
Yes, and contra to my typical MO, I am all in favor of taking our time and getting it right.

Originally Posted by smilee
Not sure I agree with this. Although not true mileage runs, I think that a big interest is on using the premium fares to build trips to earn status or help re qualify. Look at the BA tier point thread for example.
Yeah. And that DNA of the premium fares thread cum forum is pretty compelling. And it's also the future of elite programs: PQDs.

My worry is that this thread may kill some of the deals quicker -- look at the CMB fares as an example.

But that all said I think that I would still like to see a separate forum.
Just like they do with mistake fares, bloggers will rub fare deal aberrations like CMB and MLE in airlines' faces in exchange for credit card apps whether we create this forum or not. Again, this forum meant mostly for legitimately offered fares. Things the airlines WANT to be talked about.


tcook052, I get your point and it's a good one. But do premium economy fare threads really count as mileage run deals? Don't they tend to blow up the CPM ratio?

Worthy of some deep thought.
kokonutz is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 11:38 am
  #62  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,456
Originally Posted by kokonutz
Because the advantage (and I personally think it's a huge one) of a separate forum for premium fares is that it will be perfectly clear that every thread in that (sub)forum is about premium fares.
Well, maybe not every thread if Y fares are allowed simply because you can buy preferred seats such as DL's Economy Comfort. Isn't that all DL economy fares?

IMHO including true premium economy seats such as BA WT+ in a proposed premium fares forum makes some sense but not any economy fare where the passenger has the choice to buy roomier seats within the economy cabin.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 11:49 am
  #63  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in CUZCO, PERU
Posts: 58,639
Originally Posted by tcook052
Well, maybe not every thread if Y fares are allowed simply because you can buy preferred seats such as DL's Economy Comfort. Isn't that all DL economy fares?

IMHO including true premium economy seats such as BA WT+ in a proposed premium fares forum makes some sense but not any economy fare where the passenger has the choice to buy roomier seats within the economy cabin.
I think you are right in terms of where to draw a simple and bright line: if the FARE is different because of the seat it's a premium fare. If you get in the better seat with a FEE then it's a mileage run deal.

Does that work?
kokonutz is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 11:50 am
  #64  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,125
Maybe I'm missing something, but on UA one doesn't have a separate fare for Economy Plus.

It's something a non-elite can add on for some extra $$, but it doesn't show up as something separate (Economy, Business/Business First, First/Global First) when booking, so to me I don't see why it or any airline where it's just an add-on would be included in the Premium Fare forum.

BA it shows as a separate booking (Economy, Premium Economy, Business/Club, First) so it would make more sense to include Premium Economy fares in the forum.

Cheers.
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 11:56 am
  #65  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in CUZCO, PERU
Posts: 58,639
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
Maybe I'm missing something, but on UA one doesn't have a separate fare for Economy Plus.

It's something a non-elite can add on for some extra $$, but it doesn't show up as something separate (Economy, Business/Business First, First/Global First) when booking, so to me I don't see why it or any airline where it's just an add-on would be included in the Premium Fare forum.

BA it shows as a separate booking (Economy, Premium Economy, Business/Club, First) so it would make more sense to include Premium Economy fares in the forum.

Cheers.
Agree.
kokonutz is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 12:03 pm
  #66  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
Maybe I'm missing something, but on UA one doesn't have a separate fare for Economy Plus.

It's something a non-elite can add on for some extra $$, but it doesn't show up as something separate (Economy, Business/Business First, First/Global First) when booking, so to me I don't see why it or any airline where it's just an add-on would be included in the Premium Fare forum.

BA it shows as a separate booking (Economy, Premium Economy, Business/Club, First) so it would make more sense to include Premium Economy fares in the forum.

Cheers.
This is the point. UA Y+ and DL/KLM EC are NOT separate fares, separate cabin classes, separate cabins, etc. UA's Economy Plus, aka Y+ on FT, is NOT a Premium Economy offering. UA does NOT offer a Premium Economy product. The same is true for DL and KLM: Economy Comfort, aka EC on FT, is NOT a separate cabin, does NOT require different fares, etc. They are only special seats with additional pitch (and some added perks on DL such as free Studio, free hard alcohol on international) but EC and Y+ are NOT a separate cabin class.

AF Premium Economy, BA WT+ (World Traveler Plus, where BA calls its longhaul coach World Traveler), whatever NZ calls their Premium Economy offering with the wonderful seats all do require payment of a (different) premium economy fare (such as the W or A fares on AF, where I think there's a third premium economy fare class, perhaps T). You can't buy a coach ticket and sit in premium economy (unless you've used instruments for an upgrade or you get an OPUP).
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2014, 12:29 pm
  #67  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,125
Uh, you do realize we're in agreement don't you?

Cheers.
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 8:20 am
  #68  
Moderator, Hertz; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRK
Programs: UA 1MM, BA GGL, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diamond and others
Posts: 12,691
A interesting idea, and I would support it, but how would it be handled?
Each good premium fare to have a separate thread?
As long as the mods don't mind the (slightly) extra housekeeping, I'm all for it!
jason8612 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 11:24 am
  #69  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Presumably each good premium fare would have its own thread in general, but there could be groupings, for instance of Thanksgiving sale fares in business class to Europe. If other carriers match a fare, this could also go into the same thread, although in this case the thread title would need to be amended.

The idea is that someone would be able to skim the thread titles to find offers of interest, much like people do in the MRDeals forum when searching for a MR or mistake fare. The current megathread for premium fare deals in the MR forum doesn't permit an easy check. It's also confusing because the discussion of various current fares (and sometimes expired fares) tend to be intertwined.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 1:56 pm
  #70  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: The shape-shifting urban sprawl that is El Lay. FT member #71.
Programs: UA Gold & MM; DL & AA credit card dirt status; Hilton Diamond; Marriott Fool's Gold
Posts: 4,691
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Presumably each good premium fare would have its own thread in general, but there could be groupings, for instance of Thanksgiving sale fares in business class to Europe.
I just see this as being very messy, as many of these "good" premium fares have very short half-lives.

Probably makes sense to get Mileage Run forum moderators to offer input on housekeeping logistics before this is put to a vote. The premise behind this proposal I'm very supportive of, but ultimately let's follow the "KISS Principle".
Craig6z is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 2:18 pm
  #71  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by Craig6z
I just see this as being very messy, as many of these "good" premium fares have very short half-lives.

Probably makes sense to get Mileage Run forum moderators to offer input on housekeeping logistics before this is put to a vote. The premise behind this proposal I'm very supportive of, but ultimately let's follow the "KISS Principle".
When these premium cabin fares expire, those threads will just be inactive and fall to the bottom of the list of topics in thee sub forum. People will only need to skim thread titles for threads with more recent posts to check for something of interest.

However, my sense of the facts is that while premium cabin mistake fares are corrected quickly (just as they are for coach mistake fares), there are ones that last longer. One example was the fare war on LAX-EZE discounted business class fares between AA, DL, and UA this year. Those fares moved up and down, but the sales lasted for at least several months. Thanksgiving sales similarly have sometimes started in early summer and persisted on some routes (primarily the business TATL and TPAC routes) until almost Turkey Day. In other cases, there might be a two day or two week sale advertised by a carrier, but if the good prices will be of limited duration, it's even more important for someone to be able to watch for such good deals easily and often.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2014, 2:19 pm
  #72  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in CUZCO, PERU
Posts: 58,639
Originally Posted by Craig6z
I just see this as being very messy, as many of these "good" premium fares have very short half-lives.

Probably makes sense to get Mileage Run forum moderators to offer input on housekeeping logistics before this is put to a vote. The premise behind this proposal I'm very supportive of, but ultimately let's follow the "KISS Principle".
So do mileage run deals.

Treat them the same. @:-)
kokonutz is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2014, 9:10 am
  #73  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in CUZCO, PERU
Posts: 58,639
So where are we?

A subforum of Mileage Run where premium code fares get their own thread, and are moved to Mileage Run discussion once they expire?
kokonutz is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2014, 7:08 pm
  #74  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in CUZCO, PERU
Posts: 58,639
I'm just about ready to make the following motion:

The TalkBoard recommends that a subforum of Mileage Run Deals be created called 'Premium Fare Mileage Runs' for the posting of threads about specific premium fare code 'good deals,' and that once that fare expires the fare thread be moved to the Mileage Run Discussion subforum. This practice mirrors how economy mileage run deals are currently handled in the Mileage Run Deals forum.

Any last-minute thoughts before I do?
kokonutz is offline  
Old Oct 15, 2014, 7:44 pm
  #75  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
I am in favor IF it makes searching for historical data more easy.
For instance, now I have to dig through multiple threads if I wanna know when the Thanksgiving sales started for previous years. Having a separate forum with ONE Thanksgiving thread would make life easier.
Dieuwer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.