Minimum Post Count to Start a New Thread
Jan 29, 2006 | 11:08 am
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: BAEC Gold, Delta Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, AMEX Platinum (US)
Posts: 18,545
Originally Posted by Wingnut
As to the spam, I think it's easier and quicker to see (and disregard) spam in a forum if it's started as a new thread. This suggestion would merely encourage people to post to existing threads (where it would be even more disruptive).
As to legitimate users posting for the first time on already covered topics, I think the very minor disruption to established FTers (let's face it, if the subject looks like a question covered elsewhere, just don't view the thread) is outweighed by being welcoming to newcomers. Also, I've noticed that often people lurk for a long time because they think they have nothing to add. They'll then discover something new, and their first post if often a new thread of great value. It would be a shame to discourage this.
As to legitimate users posting for the first time on already covered topics, I think the very minor disruption to established FTers (let's face it, if the subject looks like a question covered elsewhere, just don't view the thread) is outweighed by being welcoming to newcomers. Also, I've noticed that often people lurk for a long time because they think they have nothing to add. They'll then discover something new, and their first post if often a new thread of great value. It would be a shame to discourage this.
I don't think anyone system would work 100% efficiently but this seems to be best.
All I can say is that I wish the 'let ban newbies from posting threads' was in place when I started. Those on BA FT will know what I am talking about
Jan 29, 2006 | 4:00 pm
#17
Join Date: Mar 2004
Programs: AA-exp, 4MM, MR-plat, Hertz-PC, WN-CP
Posts: 423
Rather than restrict those with low counts from starting new threads, what about baseing it on length of membership. I don't post often simply because as you say so much has been covered, however I read, read, read. If I, a year later, have a question, I couldn't post it?? So rather, I spend a lot of board space entering time wasting replys just to get my count up?? Time of membership says a lot more than number of posts in many cases. Two cents from a person who loves flyer-talk, finds it invaluable but has no desire to waste your time with "filler posts." (although I just did one actually as I am close to being able to see coupon connection again (since the post limit was added)). I have been around two years and hate the now locked out postion I'm in even if I probably won't ever actually use the connection.
Jan 29, 2006 | 5:32 pm
#18
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,135
Originally Posted by Sprite
Rather than restrict those with low counts from starting new threads, what about baseing it on length of membership.
Jan 29, 2006 | 6:01 pm
#19
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: TWA(sigh), JetBlue, Delta
Posts: 295
Originally Posted by Wingnut
The problem with this is that many users lurk without registering for many months. The prompt to register is when they want to post something.
Jan 29, 2006 | 7:05 pm
#20
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: DL GM
Posts: 209
New posters
Maybe the software can be formatted to follow the first post with
"Try the Search feature and read the stickies" ...that would save some FT people some time.
"Try the Search feature and read the stickies" ...that would save some FT people some time.
Jan 29, 2006 | 7:40 pm
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador: World of Hyatt
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Jersey
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Fairmont Lifetime Plat, UA Silver, dirt elsewhere
Posts: 47,408
Originally Posted by Wingnut
The problem with this is that many users lurk without registering for many months. The prompt to register is when they want to post something.
Jan 30, 2006 | 11:20 am
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador: World of Hyatt
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Jersey
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Fairmont Lifetime Plat, UA Silver, dirt elsewhere
Posts: 47,408
here's a perfect example of a newbie starting a thread with a sponsored link in the wrong forum and against the TOS.
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=520721
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=520721
Jan 30, 2006 | 11:22 am
#23
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,135
Actually, I don't think that's an example of what's being talked about here. That to me looks like spam, plain and simple.
Jan 30, 2006 | 11:24 am
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador: World of Hyatt
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Jersey
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Fairmont Lifetime Plat, UA Silver, dirt elsewhere
Posts: 47,408
I suggested to have a minimum post count to post a link because of all the spammers that show up.
Feb 18, 2006 | 10:04 pm
#25
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: Amex Centurion
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by mcgahat
I would prefer not to restrict new users. I dont know how much of a problem this is for the mods but as a reader although I have seen some of these types of posts they are a big problem for me as a reader. They seem to get handled relatively quickly by the mods or called out by other readers.
So, as a reader I havent seen this type of activity get to the point that I would be willing to restrict new users to eliminate the problem. Now, I am not a mod so maybe they have a different point of view especially since they are the ones that have to deal with the issues when they pop up and since they are volunteers I would be more concerned about their time dealing with the issue than mine.
I dont think it is a bad idea just not sure if the activity level has reached a point to put this kind of thing in place.
So, as a reader I havent seen this type of activity get to the point that I would be willing to restrict new users to eliminate the problem. Now, I am not a mod so maybe they have a different point of view especially since they are the ones that have to deal with the issues when they pop up and since they are volunteers I would be more concerned about their time dealing with the issue than mine.
I dont think it is a bad idea just not sure if the activity level has reached a point to put this kind of thing in place.
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthrea...49#post5341049
I'm sorry if I didn't follow proper prodical. I receive my Amex centurion about a year and a half ago and found flyertalk. A lot of my friends have amex centurions so I thought it would be good to talk about the new anex titanium centurion. Again, I'm sorry if I offended anyone by starting a topic so early. You guys have some great posts.
Apple Pi
Feb 18, 2006 | 10:11 pm
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,351
Originally Posted by apple3.1415
I created a thread today and was informed that I should not be allowed to create a thread before I have certain number of posts
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthrea...49#post5341049
I'm sorry if I didn't follow proper prodical.
But several members advised the new thread you did start was full of crapola.
I'd tend to agree with them as it happens, but that is not the point. You are free to start whatever threads you wish. And if members advise Mods they appear to be full of nonsense I imagine they may have a quiet word with you:
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthrea...49#post5341049
That's the usual proper prodical on FT.
Feb 18, 2006 | 10:38 pm
#27
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: Amex Centurion
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by ozstamps
Nonsense. No-one told you you could NOT start a new thread.
But several members advised the new thread you did start was full of crapola.
I'd tend to agree with them as it happens, but that is not the point. You are free to start whatever threads you wish. And if members advise Mods they appear to be full of nonsense I imagine they may have a quiet word with you:
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthrea...49#post5341049
That's the usual proper prodical on FT.
But several members advised the new thread you did start was full of crapola.
I'd tend to agree with them as it happens, but that is not the point. You are free to start whatever threads you wish. And if members advise Mods they appear to be full of nonsense I imagine they may have a quiet word with you:
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthrea...49#post5341049
That's the usual proper prodical on FT.
Feb 19, 2006 | 11:18 pm
#28
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: lapsed UA 1K (now a lowly 2P), HGP Platinum
Posts: 9,607
Originally Posted by apple3.1415
Why did you just post on the other thread that the ops has adviced that I was not allowed to post a thread. It was a simple thread about a titanium centurion. What did I do wrong. Did they not get a slight sense of humor. Are they the humor critics of flyertalk.
As for what the TalkBoard is here for, I didn't think it was to insult new members, but who knows? Either way, just stay focused on the miles and points and travel info that you came here for and don't worry about the politics.
Welcome to FlyerTalk.
Feb 19, 2006 | 11:24 pm
#29
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: lapsed UA 1K (now a lowly 2P), HGP Platinum
Posts: 9,607
Originally Posted by ozstamps
Nonsense. No-one told you you could NOT start a new thread.
But several members advised the new thread you did start was full of crapola.
I'd tend to agree with them as it happens, but that is not the point. You are free to start whatever threads you wish. And if members advise Mods they appear to be full of nonsense I imagine they may have a quiet word with you:
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthrea...49#post5341049
That's the usual proper prodical on FT.
But several members advised the new thread you did start was full of crapola.
I'd tend to agree with them as it happens, but that is not the point. You are free to start whatever threads you wish. And if members advise Mods they appear to be full of nonsense I imagine they may have a quiet word with you:
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthrea...49#post5341049
That's the usual proper prodical on FT.
Instead, that's why we have a TalkTeam to help new members find their way around and correct any problems. As for people trying to game the system, I certainly know of a few longtime members who like to stir up trouble on the weekends or when the magazine has deadlines. Post count is far from an indicator of class or responsibility.
Feb 20, 2006 | 3:16 am
#30
In Memoriam
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 35,554
Originally Posted by robb
I just want to preserve this as I comment on the original thread topic. A minimum post count for new members would be very unfriendly and unwelcoming. Many of us found our way here exactly because we had a burning question about upcoming travel. Not everyone decides on first inspection to make a forum a way of life so I it's not really realistic to ask for this huge investment of new people on day one.
Instead, that's why we have a TalkTeam to help new members find their way around and correct any problems. As for people trying to game the system, I certainly know of a few longtime members who like to stir up trouble on the weekends or when the magazine has deadlines. Post count is far from an indicator of class or responsibility.
Instead, that's why we have a TalkTeam to help new members find their way around and correct any problems. As for people trying to game the system, I certainly know of a few longtime members who like to stir up trouble on the weekends or when the magazine has deadlines. Post count is far from an indicator of class or responsibility.