Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Global Airline Alliances > Star Alliance
Reload this Page >

Help requested on FRWSTAR itinerary

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Help requested on FRWSTAR itinerary

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 9:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 694
Help requested on FRWSTAR itinerary

All,

I am considering ticketing a RTW fare with Star Alliance, from NRT with SQ, in the next few days. I am familiar with the Oneworld fares (indeed, I am currently on one such journey), but not those of Star.
I have checked this itinerary with the mileage calculator, but would appreciate some opinions. The real purpose of the trip is the HKG-xSIN-LHR leg, with the rest simply as fun. In particular, I want to maximise:

(1) Travelling in first class
(2) Travelling on SQ (to retain my PPS).

Here is the proposed itinerary:

NRT-SIN-HKG-xSIN-LHR-FRA-JFK-SFO-SIN-NRT

According to the calculator, this is 31886 miles and hence FRWSTAR2. I am tempted to make my own way from JFK-SFO, but I gather the miles of any surface segment are included in any case.

I would appreciate any advice on how to improve this, or anything I am overlooking.

Thanks in advance,

Irish lad.
Irish lad is offline  
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 1:02 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 2,337
Thought of something - but then thought better of it! Sorry.
Al B is offline  
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 3:04 am
  #3  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampere
Posts: 3,346
Originally Posted by Irish lad
Here is the proposed itinerary:

NRT-SIN-HKG-xSIN-LHR-FRA-JFK-SFO-SIN-NRT

According to the calculator, this is 31886 miles and hence FRWSTAR2.
Your 31886 total is ... disturbing. You'll be paying for 34000, so that's a lot of FF points (especially in FC!) going to waste. How about a sidetrip: ... -SIN-HKG-BKK-HKG-xSIN-LHR- ...

TG has F on the HKG-BKK route and that would bring your total to 33983 (according to the GCM).

cheers,

Henry
henry999 is offline  
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 4:28 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA Plat 2MM. DL Plat, AS MVP
Posts: 12,916
NRT-SIN-HKG-xSIN-LHR-FRA-JFK-SFO-SIN-NRT

Let's see.... I would change the last few segments, and go down to a 29,000 miles fare. Rather than JFK-SFO-SIN-NRT, I would fly JFK-LAX-NRT, or JFK-SFO-ICN-NRT. You would then have a few thousand extra miles to play with.
zrs70 is offline  
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 5:34 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: In the skies of the world
Programs: SAS Gold, FB Gold, BA Gold, EY Silver
Posts: 3,167
Originally Posted by Irish lad
In particular, I want to maximise:

(1) Travelling in first class
(2) Travelling on SQ (to retain my PPS).
Well there is not doubt you get to travel a lot on SQ, but wouldn't it be nice to try some other airlines during your RTW trip?
The great thing about *A RTW tickets is that you can mix and match carriers as much as you want, and there are plenty of other nice *A first class products to try. As far as I can see the only other airlines you're flying other than SQ is LH LHR-FRA (short flight, and in C) and possibly UA JFK-SFO (nothing to write home about, even in F).
I don't know how many SQ segments you need for PPS, but otherwise both LH, LX and NH F are very nice and could fairly easily be included in your itinerary.

Also, as already mentioned, you do have over 2000 miles left, it would be a shame to waste them wouldn't it??
jacob_m is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2007 | 4:43 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 694
I have rejigged the itinerary. How does this sound? Any further recommendations? I intend to use LH for the FRA-JFK leg and NH for the JFK-NRT segment. Also, it is now under 29,000 miles. Thanks!

TPE-SIN-LHR-FRA-JFK-NRT-SIN-NRT-HKG-TPE
Irish lad is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 12:36 am
  #7  
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampere
Posts: 3,346
Originally Posted by Irish lad
I have rejigged the itinerary. How does this sound? Any further recommendations? I intend to use LH for the FRA-JFK leg and NH for the JFK-NRT segment. Also, it is now under 29,000 miles. Thanks!

TPE-SIN-LHR-FRA-JFK-NRT-SIN-NRT-HKG-TPE
Looks like a nice plan -- FC terminal in FRA, NH on one of the ultra-longhauls, SQ on the other. Except ... what happened to

> The real purpose of the trip is the HKG-xSIN-LHR leg ...



cheers,

Henry
henry999 is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 4:32 am
  #8  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL
Posts: 694
It's now TPE-xSIN-LHR!

One question I have is with regards to the JFK-NRT flight. I was intending to travel this with ANA on NH009 (during August). However, there rarely appears to be A-class availability on this flight according to Expertflyer.
Has anyone tried this recently? Would I be better switching to SFO-NRT, as there appears to be better A-class availability on NH007 (which will have first class later this year).
Thoughts? Thanks...
Irish lad is offline  
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 6:31 am
  #9  
Moderator: Hyatt Gold Passport & Star Alliance
40 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London, UK
Programs: UA-1K 3MM/HY- LT Globalist/BA-GGLfL
Posts: 12,772
Have you looked at fares ex-BKK as these may be cheaper - even with a trip to start your journey.
Markie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.