Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Routing Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2006 | 9:04 am
  #1  
Original Poster
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Don't know....
Programs: BA LTG, SQ TPPS, CX DMP, AA EXP, Bonvoy LTT, ALL PLT, Hilton DM
Posts: 4,037
Routing Question

If I'm on a *A RTW ticket can I fly the following:

SFO-SIN (SQ1)
SIN-HKG
HKG-SIN

I assume I'll have to issue ticket as one segment for SFO-SIN for this to work?
bagold is offline  
Old May 3, 2006 | 9:29 am
  #2  
KKT
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: HKG
Programs: OZ Diamond, CX Silver, UA, DL
Posts: 229
Originally Posted by bagold
If I'm on a *A RTW ticket can I fly the following:

SFO-SIN (SQ1)
SIN-HKG
HKG-SIN

I assume I'll have to issue ticket as one segment for SFO-SIN for this to work?
I don't think you can stop in Singapore twice.
KKT is offline  
Old May 3, 2006 | 3:12 pm
  #3  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,446
On a standard *A RTW you can stopover (more than 24 hours) only once in each city and transit no more than 3 times (including any stopovers). If this is the case then its fine, with SFO-SIN or ticketed as SFO-HKG-SIN. In many circumstances however, it is advantageous to ticket through flights as a single coupon ie SFO-SIN.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old May 3, 2006 | 5:04 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Don't know....
Programs: BA LTG, SQ TPPS, CX DMP, AA EXP, Bonvoy LTT, ALL PLT, Hilton DM
Posts: 4,037
Yes, I'll only be stopping for more than 24 hours in SIN once.

So I can actually ticket:

SFO-HKG (connection)
HKG-SIN (stop over)
SIN-HKG (stop over)
HKG-SIN (connection)
SIN-xxx

Is that correct? I can do HKG-SIN twice or in theory any route twice?
bagold is offline  
Old May 3, 2006 | 9:05 pm
  #5  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,446
Yes. Some airlines have issue with same route twice but it is in the rules.

As mentioned before SFO-SIN is preferable in some circumstances (eg uses up only 1 of the 24 coupons and less mileage towards the limit).
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old May 4, 2006 | 5:17 am
  #6  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tbingen, Germany
Posts: 2,732
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer
Yes. Some airlines have issue with same route twice but it is in the rules.

As mentioned before SFO-SIN is preferable in some circumstances (eg uses up only 1 of the 24 coupons and less mileage towards the limit).
All points fully valid.
But it will not optimize your PPS sector count if you are into that

If you are into that and make split segments - you might need to make the connecting leg on SQ 1 from HKG to SIN as an open booking - because SQ will otherwise make one segment of it. Just book your seat in a seperate booking in the correct class to ensure your seat on the contimued flight.

Cheers

Thomas
tcswede is offline  
Old May 4, 2006 | 8:40 am
  #7  
Original Poster
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Don't know....
Programs: BA LTG, SQ TPPS, CX DMP, AA EXP, Bonvoy LTT, ALL PLT, Hilton DM
Posts: 4,037
Originally Posted by tcswede
All points fully valid.
But it will not optimize your PPS sector count if you are into that

If you are into that and make split segments - you might need to make the connecting leg on SQ 1 from HKG to SIN as an open booking - because SQ will otherwise make one segment of it. Just book your seat in a seperate booking in the correct class to ensure your seat on the contimued flight.

Cheers

Thomas
oh really? so i should seperate the booking? does SQ automatically combine the booking. I do want to maximize PPS sectors
bagold is offline  
Old May 4, 2006 | 3:50 pm
  #8  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Tbingen, Germany
Posts: 2,732
Originally Posted by bagold
oh really? so i should seperate the booking? does SQ automatically combine the booking. I do want to maximize PPS sectors
At least that has been my experience on SQ 11 - (LAX-NRT-SIN) so basically same scenario, that when booking for a continous flight - meaning same day - it will not accept it as two bookings - however with the apporach of tiketing the follow on segment as open and making a seperate booking in the appropriate booking class for that segment it works out fine - some grief at check in though - but in the end you will have two BP - and of course at NRT you are met to be given a replacement for the second segment. The ways SQ works - bin there - done that - and that numerous times (BTW only once on SQ 1 though) works fine.

Cheers

Thomas
tcswede is offline  
Old May 7, 2006 | 3:30 pm
  #9  
20 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: StarAlliance Gold
Posts: 7,422
Originally Posted by tcswede
At least that has been my experience on SQ 11 - (LAX-NRT-SIN) so basically same scenario, that when booking for a continous flight - meaning same day - it will not accept it as two bookings - however with the apporach of tiketing the follow on segment as open and making a seperate booking in the appropriate booking class for that segment it works out fine - some grief at check in though - but in the end you will have two BP - and of course at NRT you are met to be given a replacement for the second segment. The ways SQ works - bin there - done that - and that numerous times (BTW only once on SQ 1 though) works fine.

Cheers

Thomas
Thomas is correct regarding the split segments for one-stop flight number. SQ CRS now has a way to detect the booking like LAX-NRT SQ11 direct connect to NRT-SIN SQ11. The entry can not be ended, thus, no booking like that can not be made. Whatever tricks that had been done previously, now could not work.
Diamond Seats is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.