Community
Wiki Posts
Search

*A too successful?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2000 | 4:44 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London
Programs: AS MVP 75K, IC AMB, BA GOLD
Posts: 48
*A too successful?

Given the number of new airlines that continue to join *A (not to mention leaving One World), has anyone wondered at what point the alliance could end up too big for its own good?

Specifically, is there some point at which the antitrust immunities that were granted by the US might be removed because of lack of competition?

Disclaimer: I was a United Prem Exec for 6 years and just this year switched to BA primarily because of better service on transatlantic routes and direct SEA-LHR service but it looks to me like *A clearly has the better outlook in terms of adding new carriers.
gregde is offline  
Old Apr 26, 2000 | 3:57 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: LONDON
Posts: 13
Its not the size its what you do with it that counts!
DYLAN is offline  
Old Apr 26, 2000 | 9:28 am
  #3  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 3,373
LOL Dylan!

I remember reading one, a couple of years ago, one of the * carrier CEO's saying something to the effect that * though about 10 carriers would be the proper size. Given 15 as of later this year (16 when CP comes in), I wonder if they are saturated.

They could use a better African network (but other than SAA, who would you pick?!?) and something in the Gulf/Subcontinent. Beyond that, I don't think any of the carriers want many more kids in the sandbox.
AC*SE is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.