T-Pac F: OZ suite vs "old" NH F
Sep 10, 2013, 2:06 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 60
T-Pac F: OZ suite vs "old" NH F
I'm planning a *A mileage joy ride NYC-BKK. Both OZ F suites (ex-JFK) and "old" ANA F (ex-ORD) are available on my desired dates. Who in the FTalk world has sampled both and might offer their opinion?
Sep 10, 2013, 8:53 am
#2
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: AA, UA, GE
Posts: 5,144
Not commenting on the OZ-NH question. I would consider the connecting flights to BKK. TG has a really nice F product NRT-BKK and only 2 class service from ICN.
Sep 10, 2013, 3:28 pm
#3
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: No longer loyal "over-entitled" 1K
Posts: 3,822
Sep 11, 2013, 12:56 am
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 60
Sorry for the confusion. I've done NRT-BKK on TG A380 F, and it is indeed quite impressive. I realize that choosing OZ F suite means J ICN-BKK. My question to the community should have said, "I've never flown OZ F suite or "old NH F" transpacific. If you've experienced both OZ F suite and "old" NH F, in your opinion is OZ F sufficiently superior to "old NH F" to justify flying ICN-BKK in OZ/TG J vs NRT-BKK in TG F?"
Sep 11, 2013, 5:53 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G, AA Emerald, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 10,320
Sorry for the confusion. I've done NRT-BKK on TG A380 F, and it is indeed quite impressive. I realize that choosing OZ F suite means J ICN-BKK. My question to the community should have said, "I've never flown OZ F suite or "old NH F" transpacific. If you've experienced both OZ F suite and "old" NH F, in your opinion is OZ F sufficiently superior to "old NH F" to justify flying ICN-BKK in OZ/TG J vs NRT-BKK in TG F?"