Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Southwest seems to be improving by the day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2011, 5:49 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by azstar
Ha Ha. You can fly Frontier SFO-DEN for 179.70 in Classic Plus which gives you two free bags, Stretch seating (like Economy Plus on UA) and free TV. For 149.70 you get two free bags and free TV. You don't get any of that on UA or WN. For 124.70 you get their lowest fare. People book on Southwest website assuming they always have the lowest fare, but they're frequently hundreds of $$$$ more than other airlines.
I have tried to twice substitute F9 for WN on a couple of my routes. They are 2 for 2 in late flights causing a rerouting. On the last one, the very nice ticketing people, no fault to them, were overwhelmed and the process was chaos. I finally got home, but for a while I did not know. I called the reservation line while waiting and tried to rebook, but they said they could not handle it without an extra charge. I have always been able to call and find new routes with WN while waiting. Sometimes when one buys cheap one gets cheap.

The one successful leg I did have was fine. The Classic Plus is a fairly cheap upgrade particularly if one checks bags, not quite first class, but better than the back. If you buy very early the price is lower. Close in, or as the flight sells out, it starts to go up.

One thing I like about WN, the BS fare is what it is, six months out or six hours out it does not change based on capacity. I always can know what P(max) is.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2011, 1:36 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
Originally Posted by danielonn
I really like the fact that Southwest is introducing Express Bag Dropoff as I'm the type of person who prints out the boarding pass at home. This will save me time from other people waiting in line to rework their ticket and check bags.

For $5 for the introductory WiFi thats a good deal and even if they raise the price to $10 per trip then thats fine.

If they keep the free bags then people won't want to fly on US Airways and other airlines. $25 each way per bag is a huge savings. People don't want to sacrifice their liquids so checking them in free will save money in the long run.

It would be interesting to see if other Airlines would waive the first bag and charge for the second. If Southwest can offer free bags then why can't Untied follow suit? Our economy seems to be getting better more business travelers etc.
Problem is WN is more expensive many times. I have compared fares on flights I have taken to Delta on WN and not only does WN require a connection, their fares are usually higher by enough that the flyer with no status would be bettter off paying the $25 to check a bag each way. I almost always carry on anyway, so I would rather Delta keep the fares lower than to raise them and include a checked bag for free. And if you fly over 25K miles a year, a legacy offers you a lot more at even the lowest elite leval than WN does as an A lister.

A business traveller wants things like upgrades, better seating in coach, lounges, etc., none of which WNM offers. And most business travellers want an airline that will handle an irrops situation better than WN does.
jamesteroh is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2011, 4:09 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
I think a lot of you aren't comparing fares correctly. Sure, DL might throw a T fare in 3 days out and have lower prices (it saved me $400 over WN in the spring, I might add), but compare refundable fares between DL and WN on markets where they compete and markets they don't. SLC-BWI: refundable M on DL: $495. WN: $495 (DL has a better nonstop schedule). SLC-DCA: $745 DL. SLC-ATL: $1,015 if you go nonstop on DL.

FWIW if you pull up SLC-ATL in March (I used 3/13), DL's Y fare is still $1,015. WN Y is $500 with a stop. DL's lowest fare on that day is L class, for $342 and you have to stop in LA or SEA. WN is offering it for $149 with stops in DEN, PHX or LAS.

Originally Posted by jamesteroh
A business traveller wants things like upgrades, better seating in coach, lounges, etc., none of which WNM offers. And most business travellers want an airline that will handle an irrops situation better than WN does.
I'd bet a lot of the hardcore business travelers want an airline that has a robust schedule. Delta is great in certain markets. WN is fantastic in others. Upgrades are nice, but it's really nice to have more than a few flights a day.

I think it's amusing how people try to convince others that "their" airline is the best. Fly whomever works for you. I spent most of October on a DL plane (including a $800 YYZ-DTW-MSP flight inside the Canadian Torture Tube 200),
and they're a really good airline. If I wasn't crediting the flights to AS, I'd probably be a GM over there.
tusphotog is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2011, 4:41 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
Originally Posted by tusphotog
I think a lot of you aren't comparing fares correctly. Sure, DL might throw a T fare in 3 days out and have lower prices (it saved me $400 over WN in the spring, I might add), but compare refundable fares between DL and WN on markets where they compete and markets they don't. SLC-BWI: refundable M on DL: $495. WN: $495 (DL has a better nonstop schedule). SLC-DCA: $745 DL. SLC-ATL: $1,015 if you go nonstop on DL.

FWIW if you pull up SLC-ATL in March (I used 3/13), DL's Y fare is still $1,015. WN Y is $500 with a stop. DL's lowest fare on that day is L class, for $342 and you have to stop in LA or SEA. WN is offering it for $149 with stops in DEN, PHX or LAS.



I'd bet a lot of the hardcore business travelers want an airline that has a robust schedule. Delta is great in certain markets. WN is fantastic in others. Upgrades are nice, but it's really nice to have more than a few flights a day.

I think it's amusing how people try to convince others that "their" airline is the best. Fly whomever works for you. I spent most of October on a DL plane (including a $800 YYZ-DTW-MSP flight inside the Canadian Torture Tube 200),
and they're a really good airline. If I wasn't crediting the flights to AS, I'd probably be a GM over there.
EVERYTIME I have flown DTW/LAS this year I have compared fares on WN and DL and DL has always been cheaper (and had non stops and WN you have to connect) and usually by a big amount. In fact one time if you added in EBCI, WN would have been the same as DL would have been in on a discounted First Class tickete (and this wasnt a fully refundable WN FARE).


Depends on the airport though. Out of DTW, Delta is definitely the bettter choice over WN unless you fly to MDW or STL or BNA. Out of MDW, assuming you are going to citiers WN services, WN is probably the better choice.

Another issue to factor in with WN is if you arent a-list you have the $20 EBCI unless you are at a computer at exactly t-24. I can avoid a baggage fee, I cant avoid the EBCI unless I want to be tied to a computer at exactly t-24 or risk having a bad seat. Something the legacies should focus on to counter WNs no bag fees is that they dont charge the EBCI fee.

tSame with their no change fees. While it can be nice for some, if I travel for work, if I get done with my meeting or project early and want to catch an earlier flight home, I simply call Delta within 3 hours of departure time and if there is a seat on the plane, I have it. If you are on WN, you pay to upgrade to a full fare.
jamesteroh is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 1:13 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Programs: LTP, PP
Posts: 8,699
Originally Posted by jn in ca
OTOH, I will say that WN's close in prices have become asinine. Those are fares I will not be buying.
+1

From ISP, an extra 40 minute limo ride to LGA, on a dreaded legacy within 24 hours, saves me 1/2 of Anytime fares, even with 1 bag fee of $25 and I can go DIRECT saving me at least 1.5 hours not having to connect at MDW.

There was no more loyal WN fan than me from 1999-2010 flying from ISP, never considered the competition, making crazy connections.

Plus I am sitting on 8 x 1.0 awards that just seems impossible to use out of ISP.

YMMV at other airports. I hope its a different story out there!
joshua362 is online now  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 2:35 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Programs: AS MVP, Elevate, AAdvantage, Mileage Plus
Posts: 1,992
I almost never check bags, so bags fly free is pretty much moot to me. However, schedule frequency and the lack of change fees is the main reason I stay loyal to WN. For example, if I flew UA on the same route, I'd have to pay $150 every time I wanted to change my ticket. Given that my usual route is SAN-SFO, that might exceed the value of my ticket in some cases. I've probably saved well over $1000 this year by not having to pay change fees on WN. The ability to make multiple reservations in advance and not have to worry about some last minute change to my work schedule is really a huge, huge benefit to flying WN. That said, I've been having trouble finding any decent fares lately within 7 days of departure, so it's not providing me with as much flexibility as it used to.

I also agree with others that most WN employees provide excellent customer service.
EIPremier is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 5:37 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Originally Posted by jamesteroh
A business traveller wants things like upgrades, better seating in coach, lounges, etc., none of which WNM offers. And most business travellers want an airline that will handle an irrops situation better than WN does.
I want an airline that moves my sorry butt long distances very quickly. Beyond that, everything else becomes branches on the decision tree, most of them quite irrelevant to the primary goal.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 8:38 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
I want an airline that moves my sorry butt long distances very quickly. Beyond that, everything else becomes branches on the decision tree, most of them quite irrelevant to the primary goal.
I want that as well, and in my stiatuion Delta provides a much job than WN. I can get direct non-stops to almost any city on DL and cant on WN (and I realize out of a place like MDW it would be the total opposite), if I want to fly home earlier I can for no charge on Delta on a cheap ticket'. And not to mention an IRROPs situation, any legacy you fly with a lot will probably get you to destination a lot faster than an a-lister would with WN.



Also the problem of airports they dont service that I fly to. They dont provide service to ATL, DCA, MIA or DFW.

They USED to do a great in the 90s of getting me from DTW to MDW and BNA but lately they have been awful about delays and I have been flying to many other different cities now. Back when I used to fly mainly to MDW and BNA and when they had a VERY GENEROUS RR program, it made snese for me to use WN. Four short business trips and I had a ticket to use to LA or SF or for mardis gras or some other event when airfares were absurd.
jamesteroh is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 3:09 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 734
Free Bags - Better Than Just Saving $$

I think there is another advantage to WN that people don't note or appreciate. I recently flew on Alaska and was shocked by the boarding experience - I presume because of the charge for checked baggage, the boarding process was crazy! EVERYONE was itching to board 35 minutes before departure to stuff their bags overhead, there was no room for ANY roller bags by the time my row was called and the scene was quite angry and charged on board.

WN offering free checked baggage seems to reduce the number of bags loaded on board. That's an advantage evn for those that DON'T check bags. Thanks WN - PLEASE stick with the no checked bag fee policy -it's noticed and appreciated.
bofc is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 3:34 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,461
Originally Posted by bofc
WN offering free checked baggage seems to reduce the number of bags loaded on board. That's an advantage evn for those that DON'T check bags. Thanks WN - PLEASE stick with the no checked bag fee policy -it's noticed and appreciated.
That is exactly my experience on US and UA.
lougord99 is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 5:07 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
Originally Posted by bofc
EVERYONE was itching to board 35 minutes before departure to stuff their bags overhead, there was no room for ANY roller bags by the time my row was called and the scene was quite angry and charged on board.
I've noticed this on DL as well.

One thing that really irks me on AS: they board now 45 minutes early. If you're on a 73G in F, you have to be board when they call F, otherwise you risk having your bags gate checked. If you board when they start, you can be on the plane a full hour before it even moves, since the flight deck has to wait for the final numbers to be sent over before they push.
tusphotog is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 6:04 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Programs: Delta DM & MM, Hilton DM, Marriott gold, Hyatt Globalist, Alaska 75K, Wyndham Diamond,
Posts: 15,399
Originally Posted by bofc
I think there is another advantage to WN that people don't note or appreciate. I recently flew on Alaska and was shocked by the boarding experience - I presume because of the charge for checked baggage, the boarding process was crazy! EVERYONE was itching to board 35 minutes before departure to stuff their bags overhead, there was no room for ANY roller bags by the time my row was called and the scene was quite angry and charged on board.

WN offering free checked baggage seems to reduce the number of bags loaded on board. That's an advantage evn for those that DON'T check bags. Thanks WN - PLEASE stick with the no checked bag fee policy -it's noticed and appreciated.
I have seen bins full on WN as well. Problem with Wn is even if you do check a bag you need to boars ASAP if you want a decent seat.
jamesteroh is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 9:42 pm
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicagoland, IL, USA
Programs: WN CP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,192
"From ABC to DEF, WN is cheaper on this specific date I have in mind, so you should fly them."

"Oh, yeah, well from GHI to JKL, DL is cheaper on some other date even with bag fees, so you should fly THEM."

Flyertalk should automatically put "YMMV" after every single post. Might save some of this back-and-forth with people using minuscule data points trying to prove sweeping statements.

Fly whatever meets your needs on that trip for comfort, speed, schedule, price, fees, FF program, time of year, promos, etc. Use linear algebra if you want to facilitate the computation. Don't copy me on the data.

And I agree with the point about going around repeatedly posting how crummy an airline is when you don't fly it. I have never flown Frontier or JetBlue, so why would I go to those forums and tell everyone how dumb he is for flying them? And it gets very tiresome to read the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over. Hey, we got it.

YMMV.

Last edited by toomanybooks; Oct 30, 2011 at 10:02 pm
toomanybooks is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2011, 11:08 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: LAX
Programs: WN A-List
Posts: 1,020
I rarely book my business travel more than 1-2 weeks out and on WN you aren't doomed to a middle seat in this scenario. I have to wonder if the next "revenue enhancement" trend in airline travel will be to the US Airways model of basically witholding a bunch of window/aisle seats so that people will pay for a "preferred seat."

I recently flew AA to Dallas and they probably made 6-8 announcements during the boarding process about the lack of overhead space. That was after being accosted by the airport personnel at LAX to make sure that my carry-on bag met size guidelines before being allowed to proceed to the security checkpoint...That's just not something you experience on WN. I will say AA's new Virgin America style interiors on some of their 737's put WN to shame.

Last edited by Dunbar; Oct 30, 2011 at 11:17 pm
Dunbar is offline  
Old Oct 31, 2011, 12:12 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: TUS/PDX
Programs: WN CP/A-List, AS MVPG75K
Posts: 5,798
Originally Posted by jamesteroh
I have seen bins full on WN as well. Problem with Wn is even if you do check a bag you need to boars ASAP if you want a decent seat.
In my experience full bins on WN happen more frequently in the winter than they do in the summer. I rarely see them gate check bags (unless we're on a -500), on the west coast. Out of MDW or STL or somewhere equally as miserable in January? They start gate checking before the C group boards.

That being said, years ago, I boarded a WN flight last. Grabbed the middle lounge seat in row 1 and proceeded to hunt for some space for my rolling camera bag in the overhead. The captain heard me explaining to the FAs why I wasn't going to send $30,000 worth of camera gear downstairs, said he's stick it in the flight deck and we were off. ^
tusphotog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.