SQ286-322 'thru flight' logistics at SIN
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,498
SQ286-322 'thru flight' logistics at SIN
A New Zealand newspaper is reporting "A Singapore Airlines spokesman said 450 to 460 people were expected to fly out of Auckland at 4.10pm today on a special flight to London with a "gas and go" stopover in Singapore where no one will be allowed off the plane except for about 80 Singaporeans who will stay there." https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=12320685
The aircraft is 9V-SKZ and is presently en route to SIN as the normal SQ286. I assume once it lands in SIN it will be turned round to become the normal SQ322. If it is correct that no one is allowed off: (a) that will be a long flight for people on board without even a cabin refresh midway; and (b) this might possibly be the world's first 'thru flight' with a change in flight number en route!
The aircraft is 9V-SKZ and is presently en route to SIN as the normal SQ286. I assume once it lands in SIN it will be turned round to become the normal SQ322. If it is correct that no one is allowed off: (a) that will be a long flight for people on board without even a cabin refresh midway; and (b) this might possibly be the world's first 'thru flight' with a change in flight number en route!
#4
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: MEL
Programs: SQ KrisFlyer
Posts: 46
So... I've been following 9V-SKZ on its mammoth journey from AKL to LHR:
- SQ286 departed AKL on time at 16:20 NZDT, arriving in SIN 10hr19min later at 21:39 SST, 21 minutes earlier than scheduled.
- SQ322 departed SIN just under 2 hours later at 23:34 SST, arriving in LHR 13hr13min later at 05:47 BST, 8 minutes earlier than scheduled.
#5
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BRU, SIN, PEK
Programs: SQ TPP, LH SEN
Posts: 3,235
SQ322 departed SIN just under 2 hours later at 23:34 SST, arriving in LHR 13hr13min later at 05:47 BST, 8 minutes earlier than scheduled.9V-SKZ is of course a refurbed bird so lucky those that were in the new Suites (would they even have passengers travelling in the Suites?).
#6
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: MEL
Programs: SQ KrisFlyer
Posts: 46
You're right - especially on SQ26 (the FRA-JFK component) - I reckon Y would have sold out, then J, and anyone who was really desperate to get home would've forked out a fortune for a single seat (a single seat on SQ26 FRA-JFK in Suites runs at 4,098.11 EUR (approx. 4,500 USD) at the time of checking). Not too bad actually, given that I've heard of stories of stranded Australians forking out upwards of 10,000 AUD for a Y seat to get back home from LHR or LIM!
#7
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: Amtrak Guest Rewards (SE), Virgin America Elevate, Hyatt Gold Passport (Platinum), VIA Preference
Posts: 3,134
One thing I'm wondering: A lot of flights like this require everyone to get off, clear immigration (I think), and get back on. I seem to recall that this was the case on the EB CX flight through YVR. I'm guessing that Singapore is just sort of nodding everyone through?
#8
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BRU, SIN, PEK
Programs: SQ TPP, LH SEN
Posts: 3,235
One thing I'm wondering: A lot of flights like this require everyone to get off, clear immigration (I think), and get back on. I seem to recall that this was the case on the EB CX flight through YVR. I'm guessing that Singapore is just sort of nodding everyone through?
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,730
There were any number of triangular flights in the past where passengers leave and join at one port, while others remain onboard, and the flight number changes.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: WLG/BKK
Programs: TG*G, NZ*GE, QF G, Accor Gold
Posts: 10,205
Probably the change to the flight number. Most flights with a brief technical stop for fuel/pas usually retained the same flight number eg SQ248 WLG-MEL-SIN.