Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IAD, also in the future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2008, 4:56 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington / Copenhagen
Programs: SAS EBP, BA EC Gold, SPG Platinum, First Gold, Radisson Gold Elite, etc....
Posts: 69
IAD, also in the future?

I have heard some rumors lately, that SAS my be considering to stop the CPH>IAD>CPH flight. Has anyone heard about this and is it likely?

The reason is that we use this very frequently and would need to find alternative flights. Better to have some time to do this, than be looking at the last minute.

I recall similar rumors 3-4 years ago, at the time the story was that United wanted the route.

Any assistance on insight you may have would be greatly appreciated
chris flyalot is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2008, 10:42 am
  #2  
ksu
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: KSU (Kristiansund N, Norway)
Programs: SAS EBD/ *G
Posts: 2,163
Originally Posted by chris flyalot
I have heard some rumors lately, that SAS my be considering to stop the CPH>IAD>CPH flight. Has anyone heard about this and is it likely?

The reason is that we use this very frequently and would need to find alternative flights. Better to have some time to do this, than be looking at the last minute.

I recall similar rumors 3-4 years ago, at the time the story was that United wanted the route.

Any assistance on insight you may have would be greatly appreciated
Well didn't UA fly it a couple of years ago? AFAIR it was on behalf of SK.
ksu is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2008, 10:47 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Programs: AY Platinum,Marriott Gold,HH Diamond,Sixt Platinum,Hertz PC,AMEX Platinum
Posts: 1,946
Originally Posted by ksu
Well didn't UA fly it a couple of years ago? AFAIR it was on behalf of SK.
Was it that when SK wet-leased it from UA while renewing their cabins?
miikka is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2008, 11:12 am
  #4  
ksu
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: KSU (Kristiansund N, Norway)
Programs: SAS EBD/ *G
Posts: 2,163
Originally Posted by miikka
Was it that when SK wet-leased it from UA while renewing their cabins?
I think so, yes.

Speculations about a possible UA/CO-merger belongs in a different thread, but I can't help thinking that using EWR as the primary connecting airport for SK in the US was better for load factor, having both a major tourist and business destination and onward connections served by the same flights, instead of splitting up the traffic.

OK, EWR is not the ideal connecting airport, but that certainly goes for IAD as well!!

Last edited by ksu; Apr 25, 2008 at 11:19 am
ksu is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2008, 11:40 am
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Close to the beach
Programs: AA EP, UA 1K, DL GM, Tumlare Bussresor Super Class
Posts: 6,974
Instead of only flying to airports mainly served by UA and CO, what about partnering with US?
CPH-PHL is probably not a good idea, but what about CPH-CLT?
That would offer connections in the south, and people could fly to ORD/EWR when they're off to northern U.S.
Vunder31 is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2008, 7:39 pm
  #6  
Hilton Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,323
Originally Posted by Vunder31
Instead of only flying to airports mainly served by UA and CO, what about partnering with US?
CPH-PHL is probably not a good idea, but what about CPH-CLT?
That would offer connections in the south, and people could fly to ORD/EWR when they're off to northern U.S.
Don't expect SAS to partner any closer with US.. They looked at US new route to ARN as a hostile attack on SAS's home market
tommy777 is offline  
Old Apr 26, 2008, 10:45 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CPH
Programs: SAS Diamond, SAS Lifetime Gold
Posts: 72
Originally Posted by tommy777
They looked at US new route to ARN as a hostile attack on SAS's home market
Hostile attack or healthy competition, there are many views of the world
laksko is offline  
Old Apr 26, 2008, 6:42 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington / Copenhagen
Programs: SAS EBP, BA EC Gold, SPG Platinum, First Gold, Radisson Gold Elite, etc....
Posts: 69
EWR vs. IAD

I certainly prefer IAD over EWR, mainly due to frequent long delays in EWR. IAD also is (much) closer to my home and business, if I needed to transfer through EWR to get to CPH, I would rather transfer in Europe (FRA, MUC or even LHR). Likely I am not in the majority, but seems many passengers to IAD have onwards flights to FL, NC, GA - so at least IAD is in the right direction.

My concern is that they will (may) pull the flight with little notification, in which case I will need to find alternative route.

Any thoughts on how likely this is?
chris flyalot is offline  
Old Apr 26, 2008, 10:03 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Programs: AY Platinum,Marriott Gold,HH Diamond,Sixt Platinum,Hertz PC,AMEX Platinum
Posts: 1,946
Originally Posted by chris flyalot
My concern is that they will (may) pull the flight with little notification, in which case I will need to find alternative route.

Any thoughts on how likely this is?
I don't think anyone can be sure about it but of course it is possible that SAS would pull the route quickly, they have done it before with PVG for example so it is possible. But we can also see that they have focused quite much to US routes anyway so pulling IAD is in my opinion less likely.
miikka is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2008, 7:41 pm
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington / Copenhagen
Programs: SAS EBP, BA EC Gold, SPG Platinum, First Gold, Radisson Gold Elite, etc....
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by miikka
I don't think anyone can be sure about it but of course it is possible that SAS would pull the route quickly, they have done it before with PVG for example so it is possible. But we can also see that they have focused quite much to US routes anyway so pulling IAD is in my opinion less likely.
Good points, sure hope they decide to stay - it makes my travel from IAD>CPH a short hop, rather than multi-airport-transfer, with resultant loss of time. Last year I did at least 20 return trips, so even 4-5 hours in each direction quickly add-up
chris flyalot is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 12:42 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,935
With the intro of SFO as a destination next year (I hope they keep that promise this time) some changes may occur on the US routes - I would expet though that SEA would be the destination most affected - unfortunately - if any at all.

UA was in on the CPH-IAD-CPH route while SK upgraded their intercont fleet, as wet lease. Hardly a success, do a search on this forum on you will find adjectives on this that do have a very negative trend to it.
FT Guest xyzpdq is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 11:58 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: OSL
Programs: SAS EB Diamond, CC Concierge, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 38
I have used the CPH-IAD route several times, last time was a week ago, when I traveled from OSL to MIA.

If SAS decides to stop flying to IAD, I hope that they will use the extra capacity to open a route from OSL to EWR or another major airport in the USA.
haakonks is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2008, 12:02 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oslo
Programs: EB*G, BD*G, HH Silver, FB, AA, SPG, Hertz #1 Gold
Posts: 1,056
Considering all the various (and contradicting) rumours regarding SAS IC, I don't think people should pay much attention to them. With regards to SAS IC, nothing is sure before it actuelly happens, like the their "12th aircraft"
Someone83 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.