In-n-out outside Oakland airport is closing due to high number of crimes
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SFO
Programs: Delta Gold 1MM, JAL JGC Diamond, Marriott LT Titanium
Posts: 398
In-n-out outside Oakland airport is closing due to high number of crimes
https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/ar...t-18610993.php
I am going to move my upcoming OAK flights to SFO instead...
I am going to move my upcoming OAK flights to SFO instead...
#2
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: SFO/OAK
Programs: UA PM
Posts: 64
https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/ar...t-18610993.php
I am going to move my upcoming OAK flights to SFO instead...
I am going to move my upcoming OAK flights to SFO instead...
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA USA
Programs: Piggly Wiggly "Shop the Pig!" Preferred Shopper
Posts: 57,627
BART between OAK to the Coliseum station remains a safe and reliable option.
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 57,283
And now Denny's is closing for the same reason. https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/artic...e-18640790.php
I wish I could agree with those suggesting that this is a limited problem, impacting only the area surrounding the airport. To me, it's a manifestation of the "broken windows" phenomenon, and if it's not checked immediately, we will see the lawlessness spread beyond the 98th Ave and Hegenberger corridors (in many ways, it already has).
What's happening in this area is a deeply troubling breakdown in the rule of law, and the lack of meaningful response by politicians and law enforcement is in many ways even more troubling.
I wish I could agree with those suggesting that this is a limited problem, impacting only the area surrounding the airport. To me, it's a manifestation of the "broken windows" phenomenon, and if it's not checked immediately, we will see the lawlessness spread beyond the 98th Ave and Hegenberger corridors (in many ways, it already has).
What's happening in this area is a deeply troubling breakdown in the rule of law, and the lack of meaningful response by politicians and law enforcement is in many ways even more troubling.
#6
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues & San Francisco
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,061
I'm not one to focus on doom and gloom from mainstream news, but
From my limited observation of having many friends who live in Oakland, I think the crime situation is getting worse and worse throughout. I know a number of people who have been attacked at gunpoint, one very seriously. It's the same friends I've known for years, who have lived there for years, so I think there's definitely a problem that's not being attended to.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, AS MVP, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 16,027
It's the natural result of decades of neglect, exacerbated by Prop 47, the pandemic, defund police, mentally ill and addicts roaming the streets, and inaction by local and state government.
I'm enjoying watching the crash and burn as there continues to be denial of the reality at the highest levels and zero progress towards effective solutions. Eventually there will be no services in these areas. In the meantime I'd advise visitors to avoid stopping in certain areas in Oakland.
I'm enjoying watching the crash and burn as there continues to be denial of the reality at the highest levels and zero progress towards effective solutions. Eventually there will be no services in these areas. In the meantime I'd advise visitors to avoid stopping in certain areas in Oakland.
#8
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: LAX
Programs: AS 75K, southwest A+, Hilton Diamond, IHG Spire ambassador
Posts: 94
I can attest to the dangers of stopping on Hegenberger. Two weeks ago was getting gas at the Union station and was robbed at about 8:30 at night.
#10
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Tokyo, Japan (or Vienna whenever possible)
Posts: 6,453
Crazy. For years, the official Raider Booster Club of which I was the International Director stayed in the motels right there on Edes Ave. between In 'n Out and Denny's. Just crazy. We walked to games, to local food spots etc. Never any hassle. Of course put of town people always thought we were nuts but it was like mother's milk to us. We were very safe there as part of Raider Nation. No way would I set up shop at those motels now.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SF CA USA. I love large faceless corporations. And they cherish me in return (sometimes). ;)
Programs: UA Premier Gold/disappointed 1MM, HH Gold, IHG Plat, MB lifetime Gold, BW Diam Sel
Posts: 17,626
It's the natural result of decades of neglect, exacerbated by Prop 47, the pandemic, defund police, mentally ill and addicts roaming the streets, and inaction by local and state government.
I'm enjoying watching the crash and burn as there continues to be denial of the reality at the highest levels and zero progress towards effective solutions. Eventually there will be no services in these areas. In the meantime I'd advise visitors to avoid stopping in certain areas in Oakland.
I'm enjoying watching the crash and burn as there continues to be denial of the reality at the highest levels and zero progress towards effective solutions. Eventually there will be no services in these areas. In the meantime I'd advise visitors to avoid stopping in certain areas in Oakland.
This "Prop 47" nonsense has come up again and again. As I've noted before, the felony theft threshold of $950 has been on the books in CA for about ten years, AND it is actually lower than forty of the fifty states, where it ranges from $1,000 to $2,500. (The states where it's $2,500 are TX and WI.) Rather than finger-pointing at one particular law, it makes sense to look at all the pieces of the whole system. There are those who advocate lowering the felony theft threshold to something much lower than $950, but that will not magically increase enforcement.
As for "enjoying watching the crash and burn," as well as blaming people who live in Oakland (from a different post), that is really disgusting.
(Of course, this whole discussion belongs in OMNI/PR.)
#12
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,099
#13
Community Director Emerita
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Anywhere warm
Posts: 33,927
Asking from naivete. My husband is flying into Oakland, renting a car, heading to a business meeting north of San Francisco, then staying at the Waterfront Hotel and ultimately returning his car to the Oakland Airport. Should I rebook the entire trip and have him fly in and out of SFO?
#14
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,661
Asking from naivete. My husband is flying into Oakland, renting a car, heading to a business meeting north of San Francisco, then staying at the Waterfront Hotel and ultimately returning his car to the Oakland Airport. Should I rebook the entire trip and have him fly in and out of SFO?
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, AS MVP, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 16,027
(Bolding mine)
This "Prop 47" nonsense has come up again and again. As I've noted before, the felony theft threshold of $950 has been on the books in CA for about ten years, AND it is actually lower than forty of the fifty states, where it ranges from $1,000 to $2,500. (The states where it's $2,500 are TX and WI.) Rather than finger-pointing at one particular law, it makes sense to look at all the pieces of the whole system. There are those who advocate lowering the felony theft threshold to something much lower than $950, but that will not magically increase enforcement.
As for "enjoying watching the crash and burn," as well as blaming people who live in Oakland (from a different post), that is really disgusting.
(Of course, this whole discussion belongs in OMNI/PR.)
This "Prop 47" nonsense has come up again and again. As I've noted before, the felony theft threshold of $950 has been on the books in CA for about ten years, AND it is actually lower than forty of the fifty states, where it ranges from $1,000 to $2,500. (The states where it's $2,500 are TX and WI.) Rather than finger-pointing at one particular law, it makes sense to look at all the pieces of the whole system. There are those who advocate lowering the felony theft threshold to something much lower than $950, but that will not magically increase enforcement.
As for "enjoying watching the crash and burn," as well as blaming people who live in Oakland (from a different post), that is really disgusting.
(Of course, this whole discussion belongs in OMNI/PR.)
The only proof you need are the daily media reports - and I mean every day - in print and TV media - which are also supplemented by social media videos showing crime as it occurs. You do not see this from rural Idaho or other communities where laws against theft are enforced and prosecuted.
The $950 is a false flag. It is 100% about broken windows prosecution as Giuliani and Bratton demonstrated in the 1990s (before RG went batty). I am not suggesting we send everyone to prison for 5 years but a month in jail would be a good start. As well as community service cleaning toilets in nursing homes or the like. Something that takes the joy out of running off with nikes.
And just for the record I'm not laughing at the victims - if I had the time and inclination I'd be sitting out there with a shotgun to deter these miscreants. I'm laughing at the idiots who enthusiastically supported the politicians who brought this misery upon the state. You get what you vote for and from what I see there will be zero improvement as they keep voting for the same idiots. And yes we are definitely in OmniPR territory