![]() |
Originally Posted by TheTakeOffRush
(Post 26646545)
Alas, maybe Uber are too busy making money to continue to evolve disruptively?
|
Originally Posted by CodeAdam10
(Post 26646830)
Uber realizes their rating system keeps the drivers (and some riders, too) on their toes and at the edge of their (driver) seat.
|
Originally Posted by TheTakeOffRush
(Post 26646861)
Agreed. On the edge of coming out of their seats.
|
Originally Posted by CodeAdam10
(Post 26647119)
:D
"Don't mind me. Just adjusting the AC..." {pow} Problem solved. |
Originally Posted by davie355
(Post 26637521)
Welcome to FlyerTalk and thank you for sharing your opinion.
Originally Posted by davie355
(Post 26637521)
Yes, and this is a point of national shame. Our tipping practices engender fraud and discrimination. I oppose any effort to expand customary tipping.
Originally Posted by davie355
(Post 26637521)
It's tacky. It usurps Uber's corporate position on tipping. The whole point of Uber is to be different from cabs. Tipping shrinks that difference. Also, nobody has said a driver deserves 1 star for a sign.
Uber has evolved significantly since it first started. The original Uber, now known as UberBlack didn't require tipping because the drivers were paid a fair wage. Since then, Uber has added several more products like uberX (the most common used product), uberPool, uberAssist, uberEats, etc. In addition, Uber has continuously lowered the fares making it nearly impossible to make a living. Uber also used to advertise tipping was included which it was and never has been. Tipping does little to shrink the difference between a cab and uber. Uber provides pax with cleaner cars, amenities I've never seen in a cab such as water, phone chargers, mints, and even some offer wifi. Uber drivers also always use GPS unless the Pax has a preferred route. Cabbies rarely use GPS and take their own route. And the main difference is you get all that for 1/3 of the price of a cab.
Originally Posted by davie355
(Post 26637521)
Driving is not preschool where everyone wins. Drivers with low ratings deserve to be terminated because they are providing unsatisfactory customer services. I owe it to my fellow passengers to rate drivers fairly, which in my experience breaks down to 80% 5 and 20% 4 and below.
Originally Posted by davie355
(Post 26637521)
Say I've taken 1 ride for which I received 5 stars. My rating, per your formula, would be 0.2 stars. You may need to review "simple" math. In reality, ratings from drivers who habitually hand out low stars can be easily discarded; Uber does not assert any rating is a straight-up arithmetic mean.
Originally Posted by denFAC
(Post 26637490)
Every pax starts off with a 5* rating. After every trip, drivers are required to rate the pax before they can accept their next trip. Your rating then is the sum total of all your ratings divided by the # of rides you've taken.
Originally Posted by davie355
(Post 26637521)
These setups are unethical because such transactions involve real names and payment card data which Uber had promised riders would be private and secure. Not all passengers are savvy enough to know that tips on Square are wholly separate from the Uber platform.
Most people these days are aware of Square. Even my 70 yr old mother because her hairdresser uses it to take credit card payments. If a pax decides to tip a driver using a Square reader or NFC reader, it is completely anonymous. It's no different than swiping your card at the gas station or grocery store. Even if you enter your email or cell phone # to relieve a receipt, we do not obtain any of the information. Finally we have no access or collection of your payment data. I used my mother as a test example before using Square for tipping. Unfortunately I don't know how to upload a screenshot of my transaction data to prove that I have no info stored in the app about the customer. Only the date and time type of credit card and the last 4 digits. I have the option to refund the amount but all that is processed through Square merchant. They keep information tightly sealed. However, if I had square set up differently such as an online business and chose to capture customer name and information I could do that but I wouldn't have access to their card. I can manually input the card information but again, the card data is not stored in the app. So it is secured. Thank you for your response and I hope I clarified some of your misunderstandings. |
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26638143)
Welcome to Flyertalk. Quite the first few posts. I think you've identified precisely why this thread exists. If tipping becomes an expected norm -- which is quite contrary to the published position of Uber itself -- then you should expect to see far fewer 5* ratings from pax.
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26638143)
In general, every Uber driver gets 5* from me unless they've done something stupid on the road or if their car is in awful condition. And even then, it takes quite a lot for me to hand out a rating of less than 4*. Like nearly killing me kind of thing.
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26638143)
If your approach to rating pax becomes the norm and people notice, watch out, I think your rating will easily drop well below 4.7*.
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26638143)
One of the major advantages of Uber versus traditional taxis is not having to deal with drivers who pick and choose their fares. Again, you're not really endearing yourself here or portraying Uber in the best light.
I'm telling you all how it is from a drivers prospective. Uber has mislead the public for years in their marketing both to passengers and in their recruitment schemes. They have threatened to dig up dirt on reporters who write the truth about the company which isn't pretty. They have enlisted drivers to request and cancel trips from Lyft drivers so they can't take uber fares. And my favorite, uber drivers pay the tax on the money they make. We are taxed on the entire fare, including the booking fee (once referred as the safety fee) and their commissions. Indeed, uber pays virtually no tax whatsoever. They have quite the elaborate business setup. Check out the article from Fortune that tries to untangle their web http://http://fortune.com/2015/10/22.../?iid=sr-link1
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26638143)
Brilliant :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by denFAC
(Post 26648195)
on behalf of uber drivers, we appreciate the 5*. As a driver myself, i mostly give out 5* until the class action suit settled and uber changed the policy allowing us to advertise we accept tips. If a pax tip, I always give them a 5*.
You seem to be missing the point that's so obvious: if you stop giving out 5* because riders don't tip and Uber doesn't give riders a method to tip electronically à la Lyft model, then pax will stop automatically giving out 5* ratings. Your 4.9* will drop. It's simple math. This isn't about being cheap, as your colleagues on the other board seem to imply. This is about using a service offered by a company that states "[t]ips are not ... expected or required." If a 4* rider rating becomes the "norm" unless a rider tips then a 4* driver rating will become my norm unless a driver goes above and beyond. I suspect a long string of 4* ratings will hurt a driver far more than a rider.
Originally Posted by denFAC
(Post 26648195)
I'm telling you all how it is from a drivers prospective. Uber has mislead the public for years in their marketing...
For the record: I will happily tip every ride if and only if Uber offers a tipping mechanism through the app. That's exactly what I do with Lyft.
Originally Posted by denFAC
(Post 26648195)
Thanks for noticing my brilliance. You are not the first and won't be the last.
|
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26649713)
So, if I'm reading "until the class action suit settled" correctly, you now don't "mostly give out 5*" anymore.
You seem to be missing the point that's so obvious: if you stop giving out 5* because riders don't tip and Uber doesn't give riders a method to tip electronically à la Lyft model, then pax will stop automatically giving out 5* ratings. Your 4.9* will drop. It's simple math. If a 4* rider rating becomes the "norm" unless a rider tips then a 4* driver rating will become my norm unless a driver goes above and beyond. I suspect a long string of 4* ratings will hurt a driver far more than a rider. This isn't about being cheap, as your colleagues on the other board seem to imply. This is about using a service offered by a company that states "[t]ips are not ... expected or required."
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26649713)
You seem to have a real problem with Uber. My suggestion: don't take it out on your riders. You want a tip? Fine, put up a sign asking for a tip and deal with the consequences like an adult. If more people tip upon seeing the sign, you win. If more people offer lower driver ratings because they suspect they'll be hit with a lower rider rating for not being willing or able to tip, you lose.
Have you noticed the Uber app rating on the playstore? How many restaurants do you see with 4.6 ratings? How many businesses on Glassdoor have a rating above a 4? As a driver, anything other than a 5 star is a slow death. So effectively, uber gives 4 votes to "unhappy" "picky" riders, and 1 vote for ones that like the service? How does that make any sense at all? Drivers all have their own system of rating paxs but the consensus among drivers for a pax to be rated 5* is pretty simple: 1. Don't just drop the pin, take the time to enter the exact address or business name 2. Enter your destination, address or business name 3. Be ready to go when I arrive, a driver is not earning income (Uber) if the wheels aren't rolling 4. Be polite to the driver and respectful of the drivers car, it is afterall their personal vehicle 5. Take your trash and empty bottles with you, see number 4 6. Tip your driver, contrary to what Uber states in their marketing, the tip is not included 7. If you live in a gated community and know the GPS routes drivers to an inaccessible gate, text the driver detailed directions, don't wait until they've arrived or are almost there to tell them they can't follow GPS routes.
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26649713)
For the record: I will happily tip every ride if and only if Uber offers a tipping mechanism through the app. That's exactly what I do with Lyft.
Typically I drive only uberSelect and Lyft. Rarely uberX. I would drive exclusively for Lyft if there was a larger market it for it. Thank goodness they are growing.
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26649713)
The :rolleyes: emoticon I used generally implies sarcasm on these boards.
|
Although Uber allows driver's to solicit tips, its policy is that they are neither expected or required. I have tipped on Lyft and Uber in the US. My wife and I both sent requests to Uber asking them to allow tipping in the app for all services.
I don't care if a driver has a sign indicating that tips are appreciated. Where I perceive a serious problem is driver's making customers aware that their ratings will suffer if they don't tip which might make it more difficult for them to get a ride from an experienced safe driver. Although it's not the same as asking store owners to pay protection money, a ratings for tip policy still could be considered a form of extortion. I doubt many Uber drivers would find it acceptable if they couldn't get an appointment to get their cars inspected because they hadn't tipped a mechanic or gas station attendant and that information had been shared amongst all inspection stations. If a hotel employee that normally doesn't receive tips does something special for me, I tip generously. On the other hand, I will never pay a bribe to someone at the front desk for a suite upgrade. |
Originally Posted by denFAC
(Post 26651217)
If you tip your Lyft drivers why won't you tip your uber drivers?
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26649713)
For the record: I will happily tip every ride if and only if Uber offers a tipping mechanism through the app. That's exactly what I do with Lyft.
I don't care that you think Uber is misleading the whole world. I don't care that you think I'm cheap. I don't care that you've detailed a hypocritically lopsided driver rating process in each of your few posts on this board. I will not start carrying and spending local currency for the sole purpose of tipping Uber drivers. I will start rating drivers a maximum of less than 5* if I get even the slightest suspicion that my own rating is being affected by me following Uber's guidelines that "[t]ips are not ... expected or required."
Originally Posted by denFAC
(Post 26651217)
And will state again if you don't like it take Lyft or a cab.
Feel free to discuss this with your friends on the other forum; I'm sure it's representative of far more riders than you've convinced yourself. |
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26651313)
I will not start carrying and spending local currency for the sole purpose of tipping Uber drivers.
I will start rating drivers a maximum of less than 5* if I get even the slightest suspicion that my own rating is being affected by me following Uber's guidelines that "[t]ips are not ... expected or required." IMO, it's a lot harder to be a 5* driver than a 5* rider. |
Originally Posted by ffsim
(Post 26651313)
I will start rating drivers a maximum of less than 5* if I get even the slightest suspicion that my own rating is being affected by me following Uber's guidelines that "[t]ips are not ... expected or required."
In the Uber app, go to: 1 Help 2 Account 3 I'd like to know my rating. Then you can decide how to rate your driver. Remember though ratings are not solely based on tipping but the other factors stated above. But you might want to read this thread. Why passenger ratings matters |
Originally Posted by rny321
(Post 26651431)
+1. Agree completely.
IMO, it's a lot harder to be a 5* driver than a 5* rider. |
Originally Posted by rny321
(Post 26651281)
Where I perceive a serious problem is driver's making customers aware that their ratings will suffer if they don't tip which might make it more difficult for them to get a ride from an experienced safe driver. Although it's not the same as asking store owners to pay protection money, a ratings for tip policy still could be considered a form of extortion.
The entire purpose of me posting here is to give passengers a drivers perspective. |
Originally Posted by denFAC
(Post 26651505)
Why do you say that?
My definition of a 5* driver is one who doesn't get lost on the way to the pickup, is polite, has a car that is clean and odorless, doesn't play loud music without asking, and takes the most efficient route to the destination. I tend to give almost every driver a 5 even if I don't believe they are anywhere close to perfect. Unlike the car service that I normally use to go to the NYC airports, some Uber drivers aren't familiar with the best routes and rely on the GPS exclusively. Although GPS prevents glaringly bad routes, an experienced driver may be able to take an alternate route when there is an accident or heavy traffic. Although Uber is much cheaper in some cities, the relative cost vs. taxis depends on location and traffic. Taxis plus tips and Uber without tips or surge pricing in normal traffic are roughly the same price in NYC. Although I prefer Uber, I don't see the argument that Uber is underpriced there. After taking two Uber NYC area airport trips from the suburbs, I decided that the overall mix of cost, quality and convenience of a car service was superior to any of the Uber offerings. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:24 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.