Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Quickcheck with bagdrop problem??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 4:05 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF SG, Marriott Plat, Hertz PC, HH Gold
Posts: 203
Quickcheck with bagdrop problem??

Interesting.....

I flew BNE-TSV today and noticed something that seemed unusual. Normally I travel K and I am automatically assigned something between rows 4 and 7 on the aisle. 9 out of 10 times I have a spare seat next to me. Today I was in 5D and rows 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 were FULL. When I looked back from row 9 there was hardly anyone in B or E seats. I asked the guy next to me (he was travelling with his wife) about his seat and he told me he had used Quickcheck with bagdrop about two hours before the flight and saw two available seats in row 5. In front of me were two businessmen in 4D and 4F and between them was a guy who was telling them about how he only flew once every couple of years and how Quickcheck was amazing. He got "a seat near the pointy end for the first time ever".

Is this a sign of things to come???

PP
Press Photog is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 4:08 am
  #2  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,303
Yep! Think so...

Am yet to fly after "drop bag'n'run" has been introduced, but fear that this will become regular practice.

QF will just have to block off the middle seat in the front few rows. Not going to happen, but will still help a lot.
Aus_Mal is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 4:18 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF SG, Marriott Plat, Hertz PC, HH Gold
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by Aus_Mal
Yep! Think so...

Am yet to fly after "drop bag'n'run" has been introduced, but fear that this will become regular practice.

QF will just have to block off the middle seat in the front few rows. Not going to happen, but will still help a lot.
I would have thought that the system would have automatically looked at the booked pax with status who had forward seat preference in their profile and blocked off all forward rows depending upon the numbers.

Seems that is not the way or it could just be teething problems?
Press Photog is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 4:23 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 46,140
As long as SSCI still has exit rows blocked out, Im happy. I'll stick to using real hoo manns

Dave
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 4:26 am
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF SG, Marriott Plat, Hertz PC, HH Gold
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
As long as SSCI still has exit rows blocked out, Im happy. I'll stick to using real hoo manns

Dave
I am starting to think I would prefer to go to an exit row again. The pitch of the 733 must be getting shorter (or my gut is getting larger )

It is now impossible for someone 6' or taller to use a 15" laptop with the screen angled toward their face. Grrrrr
Press Photog is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 10:21 pm
  #6  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SYD
Posts: 3,045
The last time I flew the bulkhead row was blocked off.
Keith009 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 10:31 pm
  #7  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,012
Originally Posted by Press Photog
Is this a sign of things to come???

PP
Most definitely.

When flying NZ domestic I like to pester the people sitting next to me about the awful priority luggage handling that us NZ flyers have to put up with and have also noticed that the middle seat would regularly have a non-status passenger who had no idea about what I was talking about. In the end I gave up pestering the neighbours and took instead to having 2 seats.

QF should only allow their premium customers to use QuickCheck to allocate seats towards the front of the aircraft. Problem solved.
everywhere is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005 | 11:03 pm
  #8  
og
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SYD BXG
Programs: QF WP/LTG | UA P
Posts: 13,664
Perhaps QF can learn from UA with their Y+ habit of blocking the seat next to a high tier passenger.
og is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 12:19 am
  #9  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 1A
Programs: Elite Diamond Purple Gold Silver Titanium for life
Posts: 1,882
You have to call QF (or ask on the day) if you want a seat next to you blocked (from my experience) and they can't do unless the cabin is 10% empty?? (so i hear)

Quick-bag check would be cool if it printed your boarding pass, and spat out some priority/business/First tags based on your status so theres no hastles
d00t is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 12:25 am
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF SG, Marriott Plat, Hertz PC, HH Gold
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by d00t
You have to call QF (or ask on the day) if you want a seat next to you blocked (from my experience) and they can't do unless the cabin is 10% empty?? (so i hear)

Quick-bag check would be cool if it printed your boarding pass, and spat out some priority/business/First tags based on your status so theres no hastles
I agree, would be very cool if it shot out baggage tags as well! If I was to ask for a blocked out seat next to me got any good tips for a reason? I think laptop work would have to work but any other ideas??

PP
Press Photog is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 12:29 am
  #11  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 46,140
Originally Posted by ntddevsys
QF should only allow their premium customers to use QuickCheck to allocate seats towards the front of the aircraft. Problem solved.
Last I checked, having exclusive access to the front of the cabin was not a benefit listed for premium statuses

All passengers should have equal rights to all the available seats at check in

Dave
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 12:59 am
  #12  
20 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Here and there
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 1,568
Originally Posted by Dave Noble
Last I checked, having exclusive access to the front of the cabin was not a benefit listed for premium statuses

All passengers should have equal rights to all the available seats at check in
Agree somewhat, but how does this fit with the overnight allocation process that QF does, allocating seats according to FF preferences? Does this give an initial allocation, and then once a person goes to QuickCheck, any seat is fair game?
deeruck is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 1:21 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Programs: QF Platinum One (LTG), UA Plat IHG Plat
Posts: 5,836
I've often used QC to move up from an assigned row 7 or 10 (I hate those with no windows) to 4 or 5.

Having said that I think it would be a neat benefit, and wouldn't be too noticable to the "infrequent flyers" if the system only allowed PS,SG & WP to allocate within the first X rows. Just show them as unavailable to a NB ior whatever. If you're a QC member then allow you to go forward too if you like.

UA's seat block is a good one and seems to work fairly well but obviously QF don't feel that is an appropriate way to go. If I was NB I wouldn't be unhappy if I couldn't access the first few rows....
RichardMEL is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 1:58 am
  #14  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 46,140
Originally Posted by deeruck
Agree somewhat, but how does this fit with the overnight allocation process that QF does, allocating seats according to FF preferences? Does this give an initial allocation, and then once a person goes to QuickCheck, any seat is fair game?
Indeed , and seems perfectly reasonable to me

Dave
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 2:10 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Programs: QF Platinum One (LTG), UA Plat IHG Plat
Posts: 5,836
The only people who would get "screwed" by the overnight allocation then free-access QuickCheck policy that seems to be in place now is the last minute business flyers (who are likely WP or SG anyway). If they book after the allocation is done it's likely they'd get a not so good seat assignment.

I was always under the impression though that the first row or two (eg: row 4/5 on a 737) were held till some point prior to departure for just those sorts of pax. Of course, I usually show up fairly early for flights > 1pm ( ) so it's not unusual to see a window or aisle available in row 4... which seems to nullify that theory. Perhaps of course QC is actually allowing me to see those since I'm PS and not totally to be ignored (only 80% ignored)??
RichardMEL is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.