Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Quickcheck with bagdrop problem??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 2:18 am
  #16  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,012
Originally Posted by deeruck
Does this give an initial allocation, and then once a person goes to QuickCheck, any seat is fair game?
I strongly disagree with this. Keeping unallocated forward seats empty on flights which have plenty of them at the rear of the plane would do wonders for loyalty.

As RichardMEL kindly pointed out what about those pax which change/book their flights at the last minute ? That is after Mr/Mrs No-tier have checked in. Is it right that those pax should have to sit at the back of the aircraft considering that they would be travelling on a much higher fare and statistically would be more likely to be a status holder.

For those who want a spare middle you shouldnt really need to have a reason - just politely asking How full is the flight and then Would it be possible to be allocated a window/aisle seat with a empty middle at check-in/lounge/gate should do the trick. If that doesnt work one could always try the Im me hear me roar approach.

Originally Posted by Press Photog
I agree, would be very cool if it shot out baggage tags as well!
Now if only a baggage tag printer which could also attach the correct level priority tag to the baggage tag could be created.
everywhere is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2005 | 2:23 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: HKG 99.9%
Programs: QF Silver (OW Ruby)
Posts: 1,379
Originally Posted by ntddevsys
Most definitely.

When flying NZ domestic I like to pester the people sitting next to me about the awful priority luggage handling that us NZ flyers have to put up with and have also noticed that the middle seat would regularly have a non-status passenger who had no idea about what I was talking about. In the end I gave up pestering the neighbours and took instead to having 2 seats.

QF should only allow their premium customers to use QuickCheck to allocate seats towards the front of the aircraft. Problem solved.
QF have awful priority luggage system. When I was traveling within NZ. My luggage was tagged Priority. I think it was the 30th luggage with none priority luggage on the carousel first...
Auckland people was better. It came out 5th. I counted. The CX luggage system world wide still better then QF's system.
Wongo is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 5:26 pm
  #18  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF SG, Marriott Plat, Hertz PC, HH Gold
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by d00t
You have to call QF (or ask on the day) if you want a seat next to you blocked (from my experience) and they can't do unless the cabin is 10% empty?? (so i hear)
Called them this morning, was told that it is impossible, can only be done at check-in... Bummer...

PP
Press Photog is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 8:17 pm
  #19  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 46,140
Originally Posted by Wongo
QF have awful priority luggage system. When I was traveling within NZ. My luggage was tagged Priority. I think it was the 30th luggage with none priority luggage on the carousel first...
Auckland people was better. It came out 5th. I counted. The CX luggage system world wide still better then QF's system.
Putting into perspective though, how long did you have to wait for the luggage even with it being 30 pieces in?

I think QF does quite a good job with luggage tbh...just go try 3rd World US

Dave
Dave Noble is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 10:03 pm
  #20  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,012
I suppose QF staff also remember to actually attach unstrung priority/business tags to the routing tags... which is more than NZ seem to be able to manage to do.

Stil though - I would have though priority luggage handling was a valued enough service for premium pax to make it worth QF's while to have it run properly.
everywhere is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 3:04 am
  #21  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Perth, WA, Australia
Programs: QF Gold, VA Plat, IHG Plat Amb, LCAH Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,934
Originally Posted by deeruck
Agree somewhat, but how does this fit with the overnight allocation process that QF does, allocating seats according to FF preferences? Does this give an initial allocation, and then once a person goes to QuickCheck, any seat is fair game?
Maybe QF needs another preference to choose from. The I'd prefer not to sit next to anyone preference
perthite is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 4:25 pm
  #22  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 1A
Programs: Elite Diamond Purple Gold Silver Titanium for life
Posts: 1,882
Originally Posted by Press Photog
Called them this morning, was told that it is impossible, can only be done at check-in... Bummer...

PP
As for needing a reason, you don't. Just ask them to block the seats next to you (chances are they will feed you some BS about the flight being rather full and not all passengers have checked in and blah blah blah we dont care about you....)

I have often checked in @international and changed my seat to be in the middle of a 1-1-1 (a seat either side of me) so that anyone being checked in would hopefully not be given one next to a WP!
d00t is offline  
Old Oct 29, 2005 | 11:14 pm
  #23  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,303
Checked into my flight this morning. First flight to my destination today. Nearly didn't make it thanks to big problems getting a cab this morning! Made it by about 8 mins to the 30 minute checkin cutoff. (Checked in about 38 mins from flight. Sequence Number around 50)

Looked at the available seats on Quickcheck. Nothing free in the first 6 rows or so of economy.

Remembered this thread and expected to have 3 people in my row.

Entered plane. Sat down. Plane doors closed and I was wondering where my 2 "travelling companions" were.

First 6 or so rows had 1 or 2 people per side. There were no "3" seat blocks taken. Didn't see anyone in the middle seats in those rows. Plane actually looked a lot emptier than the Quickcheck map implied.

So. I'm wondering if a) QF is now blocking the middle seat off and not making it available for selection in Quickcheck if there are QFF members in that block, b) Magically people moved themselves into the middle seats and then moved themselves out c) The seats (all 16 or so!) were reserved for people that didn't show...

Last edited by Aus_Mal; Oct 29, 2005 at 11:16 pm
Aus_Mal is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 12:06 am
  #24  
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brisbane (BNE), Australia, QF/VA Forums Meeting Organiser
Programs: VA Plat, QF LTG (18.7% LTP), QP Life, AA (66% LTG). HH Silver. Amex Plat, Visa Plat
Posts: 6,558
Looks like you got the "high tier" treatment of blocking off the middle seats this morning. Front 6 rows blocked means it was probably a trunk route and/or the others had already checked in (and you were the last??)...
QF WP is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 12:32 am
  #25  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
COuld also be weight and balance issues - was any announcement made about remaining in your allocated seat for the duration of the flight?

Dave
thadocta is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 1:40 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattDisc.►HiltonGold►ALL Plat.
Posts: 22,336
thadocta's probably correct. Check your boarding pass sequence number and compare it to flight capacity. As you checked in late it should be appraoching the number of PAX for the flight.

eg 73H has a capacity of 168 PAX; if your sequence number is around 80 the whole craft would probably have a light load.
serfty is online now  
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 3:17 am
  #27  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,303
Don't recall it being a weight/balance issue, but have seen that happen before (actuallly checked in, then was paged to move back about 6 rows to balance the plane... along with other people of course, I'm not a sumo wrestler!)

Coming back today though, had pretty much exactly the same issue that Press Photog had.

Looks like it's a bit of a lucky dip these days with checking in. Maybe I'll have to start stealing Dave Noble's exit row seat!

Last edited by Aus_Mal; Oct 30, 2005 at 3:28 am
Aus_Mal is offline  
Old Oct 30, 2005 | 3:30 am
  #28  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 46,140
Originally Posted by Aus_Mal
Maybe I'll have to start stealing Dave Noble's exit row seat!
Oih, you leave my exit seats alone

Dave
Dave Noble is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.