Joke customer service - again.
#31
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Melbourne
Programs: Qantas, Hilton, IHG
Posts: 1,762
#32
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Europe's World City
Programs: OWE, Hilton GOLD and counting
Posts: 1,113
Mr. Dave Noble,
I agree with you that we have to follow the rules. But the rules QF set up is unfair. At modern day of age, the travel we do often involve with tickets issued in foreign ports and booked online directly with the carrier. QF should try their best to assisst passengers and make procedure more customer friendly and easy to use.
I personally agree that we need higher security method involved with credit cards. However I think as one frequent traveller, booking a Eticket for myself, I should be given the respect as customer first. I would agree that if somebody use third party credit card they should be able to get authorization and double check the payer's credit card to make sure it is geniune. If I pay myself, I should be treated at the level that no fraud suspision against myself. Why we all become suspects of credit card fraud when we use it? That is unfair and not good level of customer service, especially to the elite level of travellers.
QF should review its policy. They should allow people pay by themselves to have their credit cards checked at check-in counters where the first leg of such ticket originated rather than flying around the global to just to have our little plastic card verified because QF is afraid their best customers are the criminals of credit card fraud. They should give alternative way of @Office Visit@ to be more productive and user friendly, such as email scanned copy, fax...etc as minimum improvement.
The QF credit card verification is a JOKE. Such a policy is treating everyone who booked through QF Asia networks as criminals at first place!
Again Mr Dave Noble, I agree with you when we deal with authorities or companies certain rule should be followed. My argument is, there is better way to serve customer. If the rules is causing distress and disruption to customers, QF should review if better practise could be adapted. If CI, Korean, CX/KA and other Asia carriers can give customer assuance, why not QF?
I agree with you that we have to follow the rules. But the rules QF set up is unfair. At modern day of age, the travel we do often involve with tickets issued in foreign ports and booked online directly with the carrier. QF should try their best to assisst passengers and make procedure more customer friendly and easy to use.
I personally agree that we need higher security method involved with credit cards. However I think as one frequent traveller, booking a Eticket for myself, I should be given the respect as customer first. I would agree that if somebody use third party credit card they should be able to get authorization and double check the payer's credit card to make sure it is geniune. If I pay myself, I should be treated at the level that no fraud suspision against myself. Why we all become suspects of credit card fraud when we use it? That is unfair and not good level of customer service, especially to the elite level of travellers.
QF should review its policy. They should allow people pay by themselves to have their credit cards checked at check-in counters where the first leg of such ticket originated rather than flying around the global to just to have our little plastic card verified because QF is afraid their best customers are the criminals of credit card fraud. They should give alternative way of @Office Visit@ to be more productive and user friendly, such as email scanned copy, fax...etc as minimum improvement.
The QF credit card verification is a JOKE. Such a policy is treating everyone who booked through QF Asia networks as criminals at first place!
Again Mr Dave Noble, I agree with you when we deal with authorities or companies certain rule should be followed. My argument is, there is better way to serve customer. If the rules is causing distress and disruption to customers, QF should review if better practise could be adapted. If CI, Korean, CX/KA and other Asia carriers can give customer assuance, why not QF?
#33
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SIN / SYD
Programs: QF WP/LTG
Posts: 499
QF should review its policy. They should allow people pay by themselves to have their credit cards checked at check-in counters where the first leg of such ticket originated rather than flying around the global to just to have our little plastic card verified because QF is afraid their best customers are the criminals of credit card fraud.
They should give alternative way of @Office Visit@ to be more productive and user friendly, such as email scanned copy, fax...etc as minimum improvement.
The QF credit card verification is a JOKE. Such a policy is treating everyone who booked through QF Asia networks as criminals at first place!
Alternatively, if you look at a lot of online stores *even here in Australia* - if you don't provide a scan of your card (or provide proof in person) they simply will not ship to you. And if you have an overseas billing address, you can't even pay at all! And Australia isn't China.
#34
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London / Sydney / Vancouver / Istanbul
Programs: QF WP, Star Gold
Posts: 40
I was logged into qantas.com.au, not qantas.cn. Had the website come up with a message saying "You have the option of making this security requirement go away by agreeing to pay additional fuel surcharges, please click here if you would like to do so" I might have clicked.
Neither did it suggest that the security requirement would also go away if I elected to pay an additional 2,500 air miles.
I'm not attempting to make a case that the airline has breached it's own policy, clearly it hasn't. I'm making a case that such a policy is clearly unethical and obviously a thinly veiled fuel surcharge honeypot operating under the guise preventing credit card fraud.
If credit card fraud were truly the issue, the problem would immediately go away after opening my account and seeing the same credit card has successfully booked and flown 6 RTW sectors totalling 30,000 miles in the 30 days prior to making the booking without issue. So would the fact the same card has been used regularly over 3 years without incident. Even despite all that, offering for the card to be validated in Sydney or London, or on departure, would also satisfy the criteria.
Instead, there's an attitude of 'pay more or get bent'. When articulated under such flimsy and inexplicable conditions, it represents nothing more than a customer service stench.
#35
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Europe's World City
Programs: OWE, Hilton GOLD and counting
Posts: 1,113
There have been threads in this forum of other airlines that do this. Unfortunately, if you book a fare, say, 6 months in advance, and you have your CC cancelled due to fraud, or you throw it away because it's expired, or you cancel your card (and have it cut up at the bank) then you have a problem when you get to the check in counter!
Alternatively, if you look at a lot of online stores *even here in Australia* - if you don't provide a scan of your card (or provide proof in person) they simply will not ship to you. And if you have an overseas billing address, you can't even pay at all! And Australia isn't China.
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,994
As a contrast. I recently purchased two tickets from CX using the .hk site. One was ex TPE and the other ex HKG.
For verication I simply need to present my CC along with the booking reference at any Cathay Pacific office, worldwide.
I'm going to try this in TBIT on Monday. (I was going to try at MEL last week, however they were closed when I went though).
For verication I simply need to present my CC along with the booking reference at any Cathay Pacific office, worldwide.
I'm going to try this in TBIT on Monday. (I was going to try at MEL last week, however they were closed when I went though).
Last edited by serfty; Jan 23, 2010 at 3:13 pm
#37
Join Date: May 2005
Location: AKL SYD LAX
Programs: QF WP (OW Emerald) + LTG
Posts: 513
... Again Mr Dave Noble, I agree with you when we deal with authorities or companies certain rule should be followed. My argument is, there is better way to serve customer. If the rules is causing distress and disruption to customers, QF should review if better practise could be adapted. If CI, Korean, CX/KA and other Asia carriers can give customer assuance, why not QF?
What use are my QFF points if I am unable to plan a trip using a revenue ticket that gets me into BKK and then get an award for the trip home to SYD at the lowest available cost and with minimal inconvenience to me?
#38
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6,265
In fact, here's the standard Cathay text on the confirmation email:
The physical credit card used to pay for tickets must be presented by the cardholder for verification at check-in, when collecting the tickets, or at a Cathay Pacific Ticketing Office prior to flight departure. The cardholder does not need to book and travel. The carrier reserves the right to deny boarding, or collect a guarantee payment (in cash or from a new credit card) should the cardholder fail to present the physical card originally used for booking transaction.
Our records indicate that we need to verify the credit card used for this booking. Please present the credit card at your local ticketing office (if available) or at the airport counter upon check-in.
Last edited by Aus_Mal; Jan 23, 2010 at 12:42 pm
#39
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,597
Well said IC6A, hear hear! I am afraid we seem to apologize for QF's bad policies rather than urge them to be more customer-centric.
What use are my QFF points if I am unable to plan a trip using a revenue ticket that gets me into BKK and then get an award for the trip home to SYD at the lowest available cost and with minimal inconvenience to me?
What use are my QFF points if I am unable to plan a trip using a revenue ticket that gets me into BKK and then get an award for the trip home to SYD at the lowest available cost and with minimal inconvenience to me?
It is the airline's policy, the OP has not been picked on ... if not liking the way the scheme operates then there are other schemes out there, including schemes from airlines that do not charge fuel surcharges where such problems would be moot anyway
The complaint about the service provided by the telephone sales is unreasonable imo. They have provided exactly the service that they should. They agreed to issue the ticket in the UK and correctly informed him that he would have to pay the taxes applicable for a ticket issued in the UK and pay the assisted award booking fee for doing an assisted booking. How is that bad service ?
Dave
Last edited by Dave Noble; Jan 23, 2010 at 1:06 pm
#40
Join Date: May 2005
Location: AKL SYD LAX
Programs: QF WP (OW Emerald) + LTG
Posts: 513
You can. You just have to book through the office of a country where the credit card fraud prevention measures allow it. I doubt v much that Qantas sat down and tried to think of a way to increase their work for fun
It is the airline's policy, the OP has not been picked on ... if not liking the way the scheme operates then there are other schemes out there, including schemes from airlines that do not charge fuel surcharges where such problems would be moot anyway
Dave
It is the airline's policy, the OP has not been picked on ... if not liking the way the scheme operates then there are other schemes out there, including schemes from airlines that do not charge fuel surcharges where such problems would be moot anyway
Dave
If we don't have customers (like the OP) venting their frustrations and then finding that they are not alone, giving some feedback to the company, we would have autocratic service-providers with cutomer-service that gets poorer and poorer.
And, as a matter of interest, I find it difficult to see that the policy is a "credit card fraud prevention" measure of QF when its own subsidiary, JQ, permits me to purchase a one-way ticket BKK-SYD in Thai BHT using my overseas registered credit card.
Last edited by kangela; Jan 23, 2010 at 1:26 pm
#41
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 101
We have experienced a similar problem with Credit Card verification - presenting in person whilst booking a flight to originate from a country we were not going to be until the day of the flight - with a different airline. Luckily for us we did get it ressolved at what we thought was going to cost us more, but for some unknown reasaon the porice went down!!!??
The verification policy is not one solely within qantas and alternative choices exist to get ticketed albeit ones that most of the time people don't like as it increases the price.
The verification policy is not one solely within qantas and alternative choices exist to get ticketed albeit ones that most of the time people don't like as it increases the price.
#42
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Up the front by hook or crook
Programs: NZ*G
Posts: 54
#43
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,597
Tsk-tsk.This is exactly what I mean about apologizing for QF, Dave. Unless of course you are QF Management, in which case, I would implore you to address the poor policy and benchmark with best practice customer-service policies that other airlines seem to follow rather than suggesting that I join another scheme. As a (more frequent) customer on QF, I don't like the said policy and am making a suggestion (to QF) improve their customer service.
That Jetstar may have different policies is irrelevent since it is a different company
Dave
#44
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,597
#45
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London / Sydney / Vancouver / Istanbul
Programs: QF WP, Star Gold
Posts: 40
So - perhaps I need to admit my complaint is not about an individual rep after all - Perhaps it's about a bigger problem. Here's hoping it's not. I'd hate to think Qantas was becoming tired or arrogant.