Article: Checkpoint Gnarly
Sep 4, 2009 | 7:50 am
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag DYKWIA:SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night:Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,523
Article: Checkpoint Gnarly
Checkpoint Gnarly
SmartMoney.com
9-4-09
Before my recent flight home To Buffalo, N.Y., there was a rude surprise at the gate. I'd lingered too long at the candy counter, as usual, so I arrived late-the last passenger to board. Except I couldn't. A security guard blocking my path in the gangway said I'd been selected for a random pat down.
I'd already passed the airport's security checkpoint. Why the last-minute frisking? The guard, who turned out to be a Transportation Security Administration officer, wouldn't explain-she simply said that if I refused, I couldn't board the plane. Pat down? It was more like an erotic massage administered by a professional wrestler. It was so rough that halfway through, I asked her to stop and agreed to cancel my flight. No go. She snatched my suitcase and said I'd have to accompany her to security. Yikes! Feeling trapped, I agreed to finish the frisk; she insisted on starting over from the beginning.
<SNIP>
It's not like we've seen evidence these techniques are reeling in terrorists. Behavior-detection officers have referred 213,000 people to secondary screenings-but the TSA won't say this has foiled any terrorist plots. The air-blasting, explosives-detecting "puffer" machines are being retired because they kept breaking down and generating false alarms. Perhaps the agency's ever-growing budget could better be spent on basics. This spring the TSA told Congress it won't meet the deadline for screening cargo on passenger flights, that thanks to a convoluted review process, it has spent just 12.5 percent of the $1.5 billion allocated to bus and train security, and despite the 2007 discovery of a gun-smuggling ring run by airline employees, the agency still doesn't screen all airport workers. Then there's the dismaying fact that in test after test TSA screeners fail to spot explosives squirreled through security.
SmartMoney.com
9-4-09
Before my recent flight home To Buffalo, N.Y., there was a rude surprise at the gate. I'd lingered too long at the candy counter, as usual, so I arrived late-the last passenger to board. Except I couldn't. A security guard blocking my path in the gangway said I'd been selected for a random pat down.
I'd already passed the airport's security checkpoint. Why the last-minute frisking? The guard, who turned out to be a Transportation Security Administration officer, wouldn't explain-she simply said that if I refused, I couldn't board the plane. Pat down? It was more like an erotic massage administered by a professional wrestler. It was so rough that halfway through, I asked her to stop and agreed to cancel my flight. No go. She snatched my suitcase and said I'd have to accompany her to security. Yikes! Feeling trapped, I agreed to finish the frisk; she insisted on starting over from the beginning.
<SNIP>
It's not like we've seen evidence these techniques are reeling in terrorists. Behavior-detection officers have referred 213,000 people to secondary screenings-but the TSA won't say this has foiled any terrorist plots. The air-blasting, explosives-detecting "puffer" machines are being retired because they kept breaking down and generating false alarms. Perhaps the agency's ever-growing budget could better be spent on basics. This spring the TSA told Congress it won't meet the deadline for screening cargo on passenger flights, that thanks to a convoluted review process, it has spent just 12.5 percent of the $1.5 billion allocated to bus and train security, and despite the 2007 discovery of a gun-smuggling ring run by airline employees, the agency still doesn't screen all airport workers. Then there's the dismaying fact that in test after test TSA screeners fail to spot explosives squirreled through security.
Sep 4, 2009 | 8:09 am
#2
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
At least the agency responds to complaints. A few days after reporting my zealous pat down, I got a call from a TSA security director, who told me he sent one of his deputies to test the officer who frisked me. He was surprised to learn that the ensuing pat down literally knocked the deputy off her feet. My nemesis, he said, will be retrained.
Sep 4, 2009 | 9:03 am
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,187
You are presuming, of course, that TSA cares about improving their public image.
Sep 4, 2009 | 9:17 am
#5
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
TSA worked hard for the reputation it has today.
Sep 4, 2009 | 9:58 am
#6
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Hey Ron, got any comments on this? or ways of explaining why a rough frisk is necessary or appropriate.
the person that wrote that article needed to file a complaint of assault as thats what that frisk came down to. maybe TSA would learn a lesson or two if there employees started getting rap sheets for there actions.
the person that wrote that article needed to file a complaint of assault as thats what that frisk came down to. maybe TSA would learn a lesson or two if there employees started getting rap sheets for there actions.
Sep 4, 2009 | 10:08 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)
Don't worry Ron will either say nothing or it will be a non-sensicle tangent.
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
Hey Ron, got any comments on this? or ways of explaining why a rough frisk is necessary or appropriate.
the person that wrote that article needed to file a complaint of assault as thats what that frisk came down to. maybe TSA would learn a lesson or two if there employees started getting rap sheets for there actions.
the person that wrote that article needed to file a complaint of assault as thats what that frisk came down to. maybe TSA would learn a lesson or two if there employees started getting rap sheets for there actions.
Sep 4, 2009 | 10:22 am
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
There is no valid reason for ever patting down a passenger at the gate unless law enforcement has placed them under arrest. They're already in the sterile are and at that point, it's time to let go and trust the screening checkpoint. Anyone at the TSA who thinks this is acceptable behaviour should be promptly be shipped off to North Korea. Treating fellow Americans this poorly should result in pebble-infested rice and hard labor for 40-50 years.
Sep 4, 2009 | 10:26 am
#9
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TPA,DTW
Posts: 254
Here's my thought, he asked to stop the frisk so he could actually cancel his flight because he thought it was so intrusive. At this point TSO grabs his suitcase and says no way and says to come to security with her. To an ordinary person this would seem to be a detainment as I'm being forced to go since TSO has taken my luggage. I have no choice in the matter and cannot walk away. At this point I'd be telling the gate agent to contact LEO immediately.
We know once a search begins at the CHECKPOINT a search has to be finished, I wondered how this rule would play out at the gate. I guess now we know that answer and now for the legalities of what I consider illegal detainment and attempted theft of luggage.....oh the fun
We know once a search begins at the CHECKPOINT a search has to be finished, I wondered how this rule would play out at the gate. I guess now we know that answer and now for the legalities of what I consider illegal detainment and attempted theft of luggage.....oh the fun
Sep 4, 2009 | 11:06 am
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,240
Oh come on. A bit of quality writing, complete with drama to draw people into the story, and everyone is up in arms? Is sarcasm really not understood in this country? The person writing this is not re-telling a factual account of what happened. That was clear from the first sentence in the "story".
How about "I approached the gate, they did a pat-down, and I continued on my journey as normal". Hmm - I got bored just reading that myself - I can see why they embellished the story significantly.
How about "I approached the gate, they did a pat-down, and I continued on my journey as normal". Hmm - I got bored just reading that myself - I can see why they embellished the story significantly.
Sep 4, 2009 | 11:13 am
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,187
Oh come on. A bit of quality writing, complete with drama to draw people into the story, and everyone is up in arms? Is sarcasm really not understood in this country? The person writing this is not re-telling a factual account of what happened. That was clear from the first sentence in the "story".
How about "I approached the gate, they did a pat-down, and I continued on my journey as normal". Hmm - I got bored just reading that myself - I can see why they embellished the story significantly.
How about "I approached the gate, they did a pat-down, and I continued on my journey as normal". Hmm - I got bored just reading that myself - I can see why they embellished the story significantly.
Sep 4, 2009 | 11:13 am
#12
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Oh come on. A bit of quality writing, complete with drama to draw people into the story, and everyone is up in arms? Is sarcasm really not understood in this country? The person writing this is not re-telling a factual account of what happened. That was clear from the first sentence in the "story".
How about "I approached the gate, they did a pat-down, and I continued on my journey as normal". Hmm - I got bored just reading that myself - I can see why they embellished the story significantly.
How about "I approached the gate, they did a pat-down, and I continued on my journey as normal". Hmm - I got bored just reading that myself - I can see why they embellished the story significantly.
Sep 4, 2009 | 11:45 am
#13
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOS
Programs: TSA TSO
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by Anonymous
While your researching the piano, what about this:
http://www.smartmoney.com/Spending/T...kpoint-Gnarly/
At least the agency responds to complaints. A few days after reporting my zealous pat down, I got a call from a TSA security director, who told me he sent one of his deputies to test the officer who frisked me. He was surprised to learn that the ensuing pat down literally knocked the deputy off her feet. My nemesis, he said, will be retrained. Yes, it's safe to go back to the airport.
Sounds like someone should be spending scanning checked luggage, instead of being retrained.
http://www.smartmoney.com/Spending/T...kpoint-Gnarly/
At least the agency responds to complaints. A few days after reporting my zealous pat down, I got a call from a TSA security director, who told me he sent one of his deputies to test the officer who frisked me. He was surprised to learn that the ensuing pat down literally knocked the deputy off her feet. My nemesis, he said, will be retrained. Yes, it's safe to go back to the airport.
Sounds like someone should be spending scanning checked luggage, instead of being retrained.
Long link is long
Sep 4, 2009 | 11:59 am
#14
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157