Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Terrorist at the Gate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 2:16 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

Originally Posted by coachrowsey
2 TSA Spots on the jetway of my flight out of JFK Su. afternoon. I didn't see them harass anyone just a waste of tax dollars
...as if harassing someone ISN'T a waste of taxpayers' money??? :-)
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 2:20 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,954
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8830/4.2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)



...as if harassing someone ISN'T a waste of taxpayers' money??? :-)
What you get when the inmates are running the asylum.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 2:58 pm
  #18  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
I have questions about the legal basis for this type of screening.

We first started out with screening at the checkpoint. All passengers are searched so that the requirements for an administrative search can be met.

Then we had searches at the jetway. They are to be completely random (which in reality doesn't appear to be the case), so that would help meet the administrative search requirements. And, in fact, the TSA set it up to be completely random and not arbitrary to avoid additional legal problems.

But now, we have multiple TSO's hanging around gates for what purpose? To search based on what a person looks like? That doesn't appear to pass the smell test. So what am I missing?
ND Sol is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 2:59 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Next time call the police and report suspicious individuals relaying covert signals to coordinate some kind of mischief.

If you see something, say something.... isn't that what we are taught.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 5:01 pm
  #20  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SEA
Programs: AA CK; BA Gold; Hyatt Globalist; Bonvoy LTT; IHG Plat; Hilton Gold
Posts: 3,220
Originally Posted by Mats
That is SUCH a power trip!

It's like something out of fifth grade: "we're going to come up with secret code signals to talk to each other! Then everyone will be scared of us and respect us!"
Their education stopped around fifth grade. Which is why they are doing what they are doing.
asnovici is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2009 | 8:27 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,972
Originally Posted by ND Sol
I have questions about the legal basis for this type of screening.
Don't expect the TSA to answer them. They are not constrained by legal bases; unless you are prepared to sue them. You won't win even then, but what the hell...
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 4:31 pm
  #22  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ireland (DUB)
Programs: AA PLAT
Posts: 622
I've experienced this twice ex-ORD so far this year. Both times there were 2 TSA personnel just at the gate stopping random passengers and patting them down and searching their baggage.

(Same happens ex-DUB every time)
paulmcgrath is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 4:50 pm
  #23  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
Originally Posted by paulmcgrath
I've experienced this twice ex-ORD so far this year. Both times there were 2 TSA personnel just at the gate stopping random passengers and patting them down and searching their baggage.

(Same happens ex-DUB every time)
For that particular MO, you can review the gate searches thread.
ND Sol is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 4:52 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: IAD/DCA/BWI
Programs: UA 1P, CO, DL, LH, AA, SPG Gold
Posts: 15
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
Don't expect the TSA to answer them. They are not constrained by legal bases; unless you are prepared to sue them. You won't win even then, but what the hell...
It makes me wonder how the subjective observation of someone's facial expressions or they way they carry themselves constitutes probable cause for a search of that person.
elektronkind is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 5:54 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kansas City
Programs: PC Plat, US Plat, CP Diamond, DL Gold, AA Gold, Marriott Plat, UA PE
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Found on teh interwebz! The source of the TSO hand signals:


I almost peed myself with those. Thanks for sharing! Much more entertaining than watching the TSA guys watching me, watching them, watching me.....
kcwildguy is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 6:22 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DAY, CMH, IND, SDF, CVG
Programs: DL PM & Kryptonium, Hilton Diamond, National Exec Elite
Posts: 392
Originally Posted by ND Sol
I have questions about the legal basis for this type of screening.

We first started out with screening at the checkpoint. All passengers are searched so that the requirements for an administrative search can be met.

Then we had searches at the jetway. They are to be completely random (which in reality doesn't appear to be the case), so that would help meet the administrative search requirements. And, in fact, the TSA set it up to be completely random and not arbitrary to avoid additional legal problems.

But now, we have multiple TSO's hanging around gates for what purpose? To search based on what a person looks like? That doesn't appear to pass the smell test. So what am I missing?
Ever get stopped at a DUI checkpoint? They rarely catch anyone either but they expend a lot of resources doing so. And they are legal, as long as they are pre-announced.
rayraf is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 7:32 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, MM, NR; HH Diamond, Bonvoy LT Gold, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Diamond, others
Posts: 12,163
Originally Posted by rayraf
Ever get stopped at a DUI checkpoint? They rarely catch anyone either but they expend a lot of resources doing so. And they are legal, as long as they are pre-announced.
They don't have to be pre-announced, they have to stop everybody.
sethb is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 7:40 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Programs: USAir (Chairman)
Posts: 2
Talking Award!

This has to win "Best Blog response of he Decade! Many Tanks!
royvb is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 8:05 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by sethb
They don't have to be pre-announced, they have to stop everybody.
Or they have to stop every x number of cars so that the person stopped is not singled out.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Jul 15, 2009 | 8:25 pm
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,954
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
Next time call the police and report suspicious individuals relaying covert signals to coordinate some kind of mischief.

If you see something, say something.... isn't that what we are taught.

911...

911 Operator: Whats your emergency?

Caller: Yeah, I'm at gate XX here at the airport and I think some terrorist are hanging around the gate.

911 Operator: What kind of terrorist?

Caller: Some really strange creepy guys, I'm really afraid something bad is about to happen. Please send help now!!

911 Operator: OK, I've got people on the way......
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.