Community
Wiki Posts
Search

From Newark:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2009 | 1:59 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by gsoltso
Dumping the concourse is what the SOP (rightly so) says to do in this instance. The legal question is not so muddy as it may seem, the prohib lists
<a href="http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/airtravel/prohibited/permitted-prohibited-items.shtm#9">Explosives</a> lists blasting caps as a no go in both carryon and checked luggage. I am kind of interested in the reasoning behind the allowance to fly, but the situation was handled by that airport and the find was a pretty good one, as I mentioned before, I would have had to change my undies if it came in my bag room.
Is that why underwear goes missing? I still think you need to place a sign.

"All underwear are subject to seizure in the event of a bomb scare and TSO evacuation"
Trollkiller is offline  
Old May 17, 2009 | 2:02 pm
  #32  
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
If the failure rate of the TSOs detecting the Red Team were not so high I may agree with you.
I make no excuses for the ones that miss that knife taped to the center of the red teams back, or the one with a pistol in their sock. Those are pretty glaring problems. But when something looks like a regular bag and has no indicators you can pick up on with the equipment it makes it tough! (That being said, some of the tests look like your prototype IED picture from an al Quaeda bomb page, I make no excuses for those failures either!)
gsoltso is offline  
Old May 17, 2009 | 2:03 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
Is that why underwear goes missing? I still think you need to place a sign.

"All underwear are subject to seizure in the event of a bomb scare and TSO evacuation"
ROFL
IslandBased is offline  
Old May 17, 2009 | 2:05 pm
  #34  
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by Trollkiller
Is that why underwear goes missing? I still think you need to place a sign.

"All underwear are subject to seizure in the event of a bomb scare and TSO evacuation"
That could be appropriate in certain circumstances, I would have to be careful though, I am fairly certain that "the woman" would knife me if I showed up in pink frillies....
gsoltso is offline  
Old May 17, 2009 | 2:09 pm
  #35  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by gsoltso
Dumping the concourse is what the SOP (rightly so) says to do in this instance. The legal question is not so muddy as it may seem, the prohib lists
Explosives lists blasting caps as a no go in both carryon and checked luggage. I am kind of interested in the reasoning behind the allowance to fly, but the situation was handled by that airport and the find was a pretty good one, as I mentioned before, I would have had to change my undies if it came in my bag room.
I couldn't care less what the TSA's shoddy and stupidly-written little secret SOP document says to do in this situation. We've already seen how asinine it is on other matters; it's no surprise that such stupidity is printed.

The TSA should be destroyed.
Spiff is online now  
Old May 17, 2009 | 2:10 pm
  #36  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by Good Guy
Hindsight is always 20/20, Spiff. I'm going to agree with TK. At the time, TSA's actions were appropriate.
Not me. ETD would have cleared the bag in seconds.
Spiff is online now  
Old May 17, 2009 | 2:11 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 843
Originally Posted by Spiff
Not me. ETD would have cleared the bag in seconds.
Good point.
Good Guy is offline  
Old May 17, 2009 | 2:12 pm
  #38  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by gsoltso
Hmmm, I see my attempt at hyperlinking has fallen short... again! I will have to receive some remedial on this particular art form.
Quote my reply to your previous post to see the formatting for these web pages.
Spiff is online now  
Old May 17, 2009 | 6:03 pm
  #39  
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by Spiff
Not me. ETD would have cleared the bag in seconds.
ETD may not have cleared the bag, with live caps in the bag there may have been some residue, and there is no telling what else the guy may have had in the bag before this.
gsoltso is offline  
Old May 17, 2009 | 6:24 pm
  #40  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by gsoltso
ETD may not have cleared the bag, with live caps in the bag there may have been some residue, and there is no telling what else the guy may have had in the bag before this.
We won't know now, since the panic button was pushed (yet again) without anyone bothering to do some thinking and try the ETD.
Spiff is online now  
Old May 20, 2009 | 4:47 pm
  #41  
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Greensboro
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,496
Originally Posted by Spiff
Quote my reply to your previous post to see the formatting for these web pages.
Thanks Spiff!
gsoltso is offline  
Old May 20, 2009 | 4:56 pm
  #42  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,540
Recognizing the threat items, TSO William Lynch immediately notified Supervisory TSO Al Graddy and Transportation Security Manager Thomas Willoughby, local management and law enforcement. Bomb Appraisal Officer Thomas Carroll immediately arrived on the scene, declared the items a threat and ordered an immediate evacuation.

Is this a TSA position? Or is this an actual real LEO position within a bomb squad?
Lurker1999 is offline  
Old May 20, 2009 | 5:20 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted by Lurker1999
Recognizing the threat items, TSO William Lynch immediately notified Supervisory TSO Al Graddy and Transportation Security Manager Thomas Willoughby, local management and law enforcement. Bomb Appraisal Officer Thomas Carroll immediately arrived on the scene, declared the items a threat and ordered an immediate evacuation.

Is this a TSA position? Or is this an actual real LEO position within a bomb squad?
"To serve as a BAO it is a requirement that an employee be a graduate from an accredited Improvised Explosive Devices/Bomb Disposal Course, given by the FBIs HDS or the Naval School Explosive Ordnance Disposal School, and has field experience as a military or civilian Explosive Ordnance Disposal or Bomb Technicians. This education and experience is required as a minimum deciding factor for selection as a BAO. If an individual does not possess this education and experience, they will not be considered for any BAO vacancies."

http://www.tsa.gov/join/careers/faq.shtm
TSORon is offline  
Old May 20, 2009 | 8:34 pm
  #44  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,964
Originally Posted by Spiff
I couldn't care less what the TSA's shoddy and stupidly-written little secret SOP document says to do in this situation. We've already seen how asinine it is on other matters; it's no surprise that such stupidity is printed.

The TSA should be destroyed.
Seems TSA is hard at work on this.

Children and Strip Searches may just be the proverbial straw.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:24 pm
  #45  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by gsoltso
Just for the record, if that bag came into my bag room, we would dump the concourse and the front section of our airport! That is just guh-nasty looking! I am still not certain as to what the rationale behind allowing the passenger to fly, maybe there are some factors that are not known.
People -- read the article, read the caption, see the TSA deception. The picture does not say "Replica IED found yesterday by TSA at EWR", it just says "Replica IED". By implication, they lead you to BELIEVE this is a photo of the device found in the course of the search at EWR, but neither the photo caption nor the article says that it is. So yes, they have shown a picture of a "nasty looking" IED, but that was probably something their own guys put together and photographed two years ago, and they decided to pull this photo out of the files for this press release. What was found a EWR was probably a Sony Play Station or something like that.
polonius is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.