Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Hot off PV!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 8, 2009 | 10:58 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Crazyace718
The mans behavior was very abnormal. which is why they followed him through several airport terminals. They believed that he was trying to determine which terminal he could escape from the fastest. The team tailed him for a while until they felt like that he was finished then approached him. They were probably looking for a valid reason for his actions. OCD or something of that nature. I was told that he "flipped out" on them. So the LEOs took it from there.

They followed the individual around and confronted him before seeing the tattoos so no they didn't confront him because of them. I think the guy not cooperating made them far more unsettled than any tattoo could. I added the tattoos into the post because its just not very common. Like I said earlier if he had a clown suit or Kip Hawley tattoo I would have added that too.
Please provide a link to a incident report so we can verify the facts of this incident.
magellan315 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 12:35 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by magellan315
Please provide a link to a incident report so we can verify the facts of this incident.
I dont have a link to any incident report. The guy was apparently doing a dry run or mapping out an escape route. The LEOs didn't have enough to detain him so they let him go. The whole point of my post was to show you that crazy stuff like that happens all the time without being reported to the media. TSOs are constantly briefed about these incidents though.

I was agreeing with the statement the OP quoted.
Crazyace718 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 12:36 pm
  #63  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,957
Originally Posted by magellan315
Please provide a link to a incident report so we can verify the facts of this incident.
Silly rabbit, that report is SSI.
ND Sol is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:04 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Crazyace718
I dont have a link to any incident report. The guy was apparently doing a dry run or mapping out an escape route. The LEOs didn't have enough to detain him so they let him go. The whole point of my post was to show you that crazy stuff like that happens all the time without being reported to the media. TSOs are constantly briefed about these incidents though.

I was agreeing with the statement the OP quoted.
Then provide a copy of the document that was used to brief the TSO's about this incident.
magellan315 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:06 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by magellan315
Then provide a copy of the document that was used to brief the TSO's about this incident.
I dont work for the TSA. Even if I did I wouldn't go document hunting for you.
Do you ask all the other posters on this forum to provide documentation for their stories?
Crazyace718 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:08 pm
  #66  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
Originally Posted by Crazyace718
I dont work for the TSA. Even if I did I wouldn't go document hunting for you.
Do you ask all the other posters on this forum to provide documentation for their stories?
If I remember correctly you did say you worked for TSA for a couple of years.

Would you mind saying why you left?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:12 pm
  #67  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Crazyace718
I dont work for the TSA. Even if I did I wouldn't go document hunting for you.
Do you ask all the other posters on this forum to provide documentation for their stories?
Ever since Ron started claiming we needed to provide documentation to back up our claims, its time TSA apologists did the same. So since you did not work for the TSA and have no way to document this incident I will take it at face value. An urban myth used by the TSA to show that there is a bogeyman hiding in the closet.
magellan315 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:20 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
If I remember correctly you did say you worked for TSA for a couple of years.

Would you mind saying why you left?
I genuinely disliked the job and felt that a lot of the rules were asinine. Stuff like zip lock bags, entire flights with SSSS, the PASS system. After my first year I took a ton of exams for other jobs. ICE, NYPD, PAPD, DOC, Bridge and Tunnel, the list goes on and on. Eventually my list number came up.

Why do I still lurk flyertalk? If you haven't noticed I enjoy debating especially when playing devils advocate. This website is a good outlet for it.
Crazyace718 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:23 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by magellan315
Ever since Ron started claiming we needed to provide documentation to back up our claims, its time TSA apologists did the same. So since you did not work for the TSA and have no way to document this incident I will take it at face value. An urban myth used by the TSA to show that there is a bogeyman hiding in the closet.
I'm confused, does Ron run Flyertalk or the TSA blog?
We are on Flyertalk right now if you don't ask anyone else on Flyer talk for documentation don't ask me for it.
Crazyace718 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:26 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Crazyace718
I'm confused, does Ron run Flyertalk or the TSA blog?
We are on Flyertalk right now if you don't ask anyone else on Flyer talk for documentation don't ask me for it.
The only people who are unable to provide documentation or unwilling tend to be current and former TSO's. This is not about how Flyertalk is run, this is about providing me with a credible source instead of just taking your word of "if you only knew what we knew and saw what we saw".
magellan315 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:30 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by magellan315
The only people who are unable to provide documentation or unwilling tend to be current and former TSO's. This is not about how Flyertalk is run, this is about providing me with a credible source instead of just taking your word of "if you only knew what we knew and saw what we saw".

I am a former employee and like I said even if I could I wouldn't.

I have seen some pretty outrageous stories posted here. What I'm asking is why don't you hold other posters to that standard? Would it be fair to say that you are bias towards me?
Crazyace718 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 1:57 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 684
Originally Posted by Crazyace718
I am a former employee and like I said even if I could I wouldn't.

I have seen some pretty outrageous stories posted here. What I'm asking is why don't you hold other posters to that standard? Would it be fair to say that you are bias towards me?
I'll be more than glad to hold anyone on this forum accountable, there is no bias towards you. since you are no longer a TSA employee that means you are less than credible when it comes to statements about current TSA policies and problems. As your experience is outdated.
magellan315 is offline  
Old May 8, 2009 | 2:06 pm
  #73  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,986
Originally Posted by Crazyace718
I genuinely disliked the job and felt that a lot of the rules were asinine. Stuff like zip lock bags, entire flights with SSSS, the PASS system. After my first year I took a ton of exams for other jobs. ICE, NYPD, PAPD, DOC, Bridge and Tunnel, the list goes on and on. Eventually my list number came up.

Why do I still lurk flyertalk? If you haven't noticed I enjoy debating especially when playing devils advocate. This website is a good outlet for it.
I think it is admirable that you left. Anone staying in a job they don't like is certainly not doing themselves or those who they come in contact with any favors.
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.