Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Is toothpaste a paste or a liquid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 1:51 am
  #16  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia
Hahaha, even though I'm chuckling at this, it is strictly speaking correct, and I like it.

I wonder if the same would work with sunscreens in Australia (where it is regulated and requires a licence number) - and I do actually medically require sunscreen use.
The US FDA considers sunscreens (at least real ones) to be drugs, and thus, logically, exempt from the 100mL limit.

FDA's PDF slide show for dummies (see page 4)

Sunscreens, antiperspirants, dandruff shampoos, and fluoride toothpastes are all medicines as defined by the US Federal government. It is not within the TSA's purview to declare that such items are not medicines.
ralfp is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 7:00 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Windsor, Connecticut
Programs: UA
Posts: 358
I once had a dangerous paste confiscated from my carry-on. They took my mascara.
KChar is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2009 | 7:13 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 736
I had no problem getting sunscreen (over 3 oz) thorugh a checkpoint once, the TSO even saw it. Had they desired to take it, the back mentioned all the drug facts, etc, so I was prepared to fight... I mean, ask, that I be allowed to keep it.
PHLflying is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 8:01 pm
  #19  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,487
Originally Posted by ralfp
The US FDA considers sunscreens (at least real ones) to be drugs, and thus, logically, exempt from the 100mL limit.

FDA's PDF slide show for dummies (see page 4)

Sunscreens, antiperspirants, dandruff shampoos, and fluoride toothpastes are all medicines as defined by the US Federal government. It is not within the TSA's purview to declare that such items are not medicines.
I was seriously expecting some "You're a wise..." um... "donkey." replies to this. How disappointing.

I have a gel antiperspirant labeled 4oz (of course that's weight; hint: weight is generally used to quantify solids), a larger bottle of Listerine, etc. going into my bag. They all have the requisite "Drug Facts" label.

Instead of asking the TSO if he/she is licensed to practice medicine, I can ask if he/she is licensed to regulate medicines.
ralfp is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 8:58 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by DoggyDaddy
What if the toothpaste is 1/2 "sqooze out", leaving only 2.1 oz? Do the "rules" specify the original packaged amount, or the amount which is actually there?
It's the size of the container, not the contents. At least, that's the way the rule is written.

Which, frankly, is fine with me. Getting through the checkpoint is hard enough without having a debate with a screener about whether or not my 5.5oz toothpaste tube is more than 62% full (since 5.5 * 62% = 3.4oz).

Yes, that means that perfectly reasonable amounts of LGAs can't be brought aboard in carry-on luggage. But if you're going to have a rule limiting LGAs, this rule is at least easy to execute. All everyone has to do is read the label.

Note: I'm not arguing that the reason for excluding LGAs is valid. I'm just saying that if you're gonna restrict it, keeping the rule simple is a good thing.
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 10:37 pm
  #21  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PDX,PHX,LON
Programs: too many of the few that are left
Posts: 627
Originally Posted by Coralreef Lover
If I ever have the distinction to work for TSA, I would carry a copy of the Periodic Table in my pocket. Whenever passengers are flummoxed about paste or liquids, I would retrieve it and give a quick discourse in basic chemistry.


The Periodic Table only charts elements, not compounds, nor does it detail phase changes (the temperatures/pressures at which elements or compounds change from solid to liquid, liquid to gas, or sublime).

Water, H2O, is a compound of two elements, hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O). At temperatures common to most checkpoints, hydrogen would be a gas, and oxygen would be a gas

Ooooh, wait, I get it, I get it!!!

One bottle of water, composed of two gases, comin' through
YCTTSFM is offline  
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 11:08 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by spaceman
I have been travelling in the US for over a year with a 4.2oz tube of toothpaste (not gel) in my carryon (not in the the 1 quart bag) with no problem. The other morning my bag got pulled off the xray line for toothpaste detected on the machine. The tube clearly state "paste" not "gel" but I was told that it was not allowed. Further more the TSA agent told me that "anything in a squeezeable container greater than 3oz was a no no!"

When did this new rule arrive. The web, the placards in the airport, etc, all prohibit liquids, gels, and aerosols, not pastes! There are some countries that specifically state "No Pastes" right on their signs but I have never seen this in the US.
I have heard the TSA state if it pours or smears it is a liquid. That means just about anything can be considered a liquid. Also it is the container not the liquid in side that determines the size.

The one I loved was a lady trying to convince TSA that perfume was not a liquid, just because it cost her a couple hundred bucks :-)
jimdez is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 9:16 pm
  #23  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SYR
Programs: US/AA-Platinum, Hilton-Diamond, Marriott-Gold, AVIS-Presidents Club, National-Executive Elite
Posts: 2,755
Originally Posted by ralfp
I have a gel antiperspirant labeled 4oz (of course that's weight; hint: weight is generally used to quantify solids), a larger bottle of Listerine, etc. going into my bag. They all have the requisite "Drug Facts" label.
This brings up a interesting question. If my bottle is designated in oz (weight) as opposed to ozl (volume), what determines if its allowed?
bkafrick is offline  
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 10:59 pm
  #24  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,282
Originally Posted by bkafrick
This brings up a interesting question. If my bottle is designated in oz (weight) as opposed to ozl (volume), what determines if its allowed?
If it's more than 3.4 (or 3.0, at some checkpoints) it's not allowed. Little details like weight vs volume are too much for them.

If you'd like to explain to TSA how idiotic this is, you'll have to wait your turn. Read more here.
RadioGirl is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 12:05 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 400
Originally Posted by ralfp
The US FDA considers sunscreens (at least real ones) to be drugs, and thus, logically, exempt from the 100mL limit.

FDA's PDF slide show for dummies (see page 4)

Sunscreens, antiperspirants, dandruff shampoos, and fluoride toothpastes are all medicines as defined by the US Federal government. It is not within the TSA's purview to declare that such items are not medicines.
Thanks for the insight. I'm actually going to present this to my management. Great debate topic, by the way.
TSASuper is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 12:31 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northwest NJ, USA
Programs: HHonors (Gold), One Pass (Peon)
Posts: 680
What happens when I try to bring a bottle of frozen water past the checkpoint? It isn't a liquid at that point.

DD
DoggyDaddy is offline  
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 2:20 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 400
Originally Posted by DoggyDaddy
What happens when I try to bring a bottle of frozen water past the checkpoint? It isn't a liquid at that point.

DD
From the tsa.gov website:
Frozen gels/liquids are permitted if required to cool medical and infant/child exemptions. Frozen gels/liquids for any other purpose are not permitted.
TSASuper is offline  
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 7:58 pm
  #28  
Original Poster
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Catlett, VA, USA
Programs: UA GS/1K/2MM, HH Diamond, Starwood Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
If it's more than 3.4 (or 3.0, at some checkpoints) it's not allowed. Little details like weight vs volume are too much for them.

If you'd like to explain to TSA how idiotic this is, you'll have to wait your turn. Read more here.
The TSA website clearly states, "3.4 ounce bottle or less (by volume)" and toothpaste is not marked by volume but weight (grams). I think the next time I get this Cr-p from TSA I am going to ask them to pull out their measuring cup or give me their name and badge number.
spaceman is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 1:49 am
  #29  
30 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney (for now), GVA (only in my memories)
Programs: QF Lifetime Silver (big whoop)
Posts: 9,282
Originally Posted by spaceman
The TSA website clearly states, "3.4 ounce bottle or less (by volume)" and toothpaste is not marked by volume but weight (grams). I think the next time I get this Cr-p from TSA I am going to ask them to pull out their measuring cup or give me their name and badge number.
Maybe ignorance really is bliss?

Yeah, I hear you. But Blogger Bob over at Propaganda Village (see link in my previous post) as much as said it was too much to expect their little brains to deal with all those slide-tables and log-rules to calculate the volume of toothpaste when it's labelled in weight. So they've just decided to ignore established definitions and pretend that oz (fluid) = oz (weight) = oz (merry old land of).

If you got metric toothpaste marked in grams not ounces, you should be okay as they probably won't know what grams are. I don't want to discourage you from challenging them, but I predict you'll get a typical "just following rules" reply. Or D.Y.W.T.F.T.

Always remember that we're dealing with an organization that thinks "frozen liquid" is a state of matter.
RadioGirl is offline  
Old Mar 21, 2009 | 7:46 am
  #30  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upstate NY or FL or inbetween
Programs: US former CP Looking for a new airline to love me
Posts: 1,692
Originally Posted by sinanju
A more accurate way of stating the rules as inconsistently enforced would be, "If it isn't bone-solid (marrow not included), it's a liquid."

Gasses and plasmas aren't on the signs either, but they aren't solid.
Sorry, a little late to this party, but are you actually trying to imply that gasses are not permitted? So only solids carried in a perfect vacuum are permissible through the check-point? Or do you also consider a vacuum a gas? Remember this is physics, and as the TSA proves daily, it's not a friendly place for amateurs.

Originally Posted by RadioGirl
...
Yeah, I hear you. But Blogger Bob over at Propaganda Village (see link in my previous post) as much as said it was too much to expect their little brains to deal with all those slide-tables and log-rules to calculate the volume of toothpaste when it's labelled in weight. So they've just decided to ignore established definitions and pretend that oz (fluid) = oz (weight) = oz (merry old land of).

...
You're so right. They practiced this garbage science by embarking on the delusion that explosives only exist in a single state of matter, and continue to pronounce to anyone who'll listen (fewer and fewer listen all the time) that all liquids (with exceptions to the nth degree, each exclusion disproving TDA's starting premise) could be explosives and that on-board explosives are halted by confiscating all liquids >3.4 "oz." at the check-point.

Meanwhile the general is horribly delayed as this dumbed down to <zero version of physics and chemistry is foisted on the disbelieving.
NY-FLA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.