![]() |
Originally Posted by DLFan2
(Post 9825835)
Sounds like you have a valid complaint.
However, all could have been avoided if you just removed your shoes. Sometimes insisting on your "rights" just begs for more grief. You don't sleep in your shoes, do you? Orthopedic shoes are a medical reason for not removing shoes per TSA's website. Many people cannot remove those shoes without pain and difficulty. This isn't a matter of asserting one's rights. This is a matter of TSA breaking down and harassing a pax based on VALID reason that is exempt per their OWN policy. Taking the path of least resistance is what enables this crap to continue. Kudos to the OP for standing up to these idiots. ^ |
Originally Posted by CPT Trips
(Post 9825579)
Anyone know who else at TSA I should send the following email and what email addresses to use?
On May 25 in PHL, checkpoint A (near the low numbered domestic gates), I experienced improper and impolite TSA conduct. This was the direct result of TSA screening personnel not communicating with each other. at approximately 7:30-8 am I went through security, told the person at the WTMD I had ortho shoes and he correctly directed me to the glass door for the shoe swab. He did not say anything to the male assist person (Danny 95013) who came to the door of the glass room. Danny asked me why I was there. I replied, "for a shoe swab." Rather than ask the WTMD person why I was there Danny proceded to insist I remove my shoes. When I refused and told him they were ortho, he proceeded to berate me. And told me the magic words - "If you want to fly today you have to remove your shoes." I asked for a supervisor after Tarik came and also insisted I remove my shoes - the supervisor (Rhonda) also told me that I wasn't going to fly unless I removed my shoes. At that point I reminded her that your own web site and blog state that ortho shoes do not have to be removed and maybe it was time to get someone higher up as well as someone from the airline. after a lot of conversation between us, Rhonda told Danny that I had a medical reason and just swab my shoes. The statement that she should have made when she first can into the situation. At the end of this, I asked for a comment card. At first I was told they did not have any. Then a women in plain clothes said I had to give her my photo ID to get the card. I told her that your blog regularly addresses this issue and that comment cards are supposed to be readily available at all checkpoints. She still would not give me a card, asserting that,'if a police officer asked for ID I would have to show it." Of course, I reminded her she was not a police officer, and I that because the cards dangling from her lanyard, were turned around and not readable, I had no idea who or what she was. After more conversation including her telling me it was none of my business who she was, she told me her name was Lisa. But she never turned her ID so it was visible. The persons involved in this incident were all unprofessional, nasty and did not follow the procedures posted on your web site and blog. None of their actions, except for swabbing my shoes enhanced security in any way. I briefly outlined these events on the comment card I was given and turned it back in. I am concerned that one of the participants in the incident "deep sixed" my comments, so now that I have returned home, I am sending this follow up email. I may be contacted at I plan to send copies to my Congressman, the candidates running to replace him and my Senators. It was interesting that several pax came up to me and to discuss what happened and why I spent the time to deal with the screeners. I basically stuck to they didn't communicate with each other and they didn't follow procedures. It was clear to all the pax that I was really hassled when I tried to get a comment card. This will not get better until we bring this unacceptable behavior to a screeching halt. Baltimore BWI is the only airport that has rules against taking photos of any security, so find other means to deal with those TSA screeners there. |
|
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 9828493)
thank you :) (and iirc, you are the one that sent it to me ^)
Glad it's posted elsewhere on the net though. :) ^ |
Originally Posted by CPT Trips
(Post 9825579)
None of their actions, except for swabbing my shoes enhanced security in any way.
|
The SSIs were SSIing on the SSI
OTOH, some have mentioned meeting TSOs who call it a "SSI Form". The fine print on the bottom does mention it is SSI, but that would have to be after it is filled out. If the blank Complaint form is SSI, then no TSO can ever legaly hand one out to a member of the flying public. Oh. Wait. Perhaps that is their intention. :td: |
I could be wrong about this, as I haven't read this part of the SOP lately, but I believe if you refuse to remove your shoes for a medical reason, AND you alarm a metal detector, your shoes HAVE to go through the X-ray.
And this makes sense, because how would be know whether it's a brace, shank or knife that's causing the alarm? Now the OP didn't tell us whether he alarmed the mag, but if he did, the TSOs actually were following the SOP. If he *didn't* alarm the mag, he needs to make this clear in his complaint letter .. otherwise, the person in authority who reads this may assume the passenger simply didn't understand the procedure and what was required of him. |
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9828614)
I could be wrong about this, as I haven't read this part of the SOP lately, but I believe if you refuse to remove your shoes for a medical reason, AND you alarm a metal detector, your shoes HAVE to go through the X-ray.
And this makes sense, because how would be know whether it's a brace, shank or knife that's causing the alarm? Now the OP didn't tell us whether he alarmed the mag, but if he did, the TSOs actually were following the SOP. If he *didn't* alarm the mag, he needs to make this clear in his complaint letter .. otherwise, the person in authority who reads this may assume the passenger simply didn't understand the procedure and what was required of him. |
Originally Posted by jfulcher
(Post 9825729)
Typical PHL attitude.
|
Originally Posted by knotyeagle
(Post 9828468)
I'm going to have to clarify something here. Anytime you are getting treated like this, get out the cell phone and take photos. If the TSA screeners want your ID before giving you a complaint form, then a photo of them will do quite well. Especially when they very conveniently refuse to identify themselves. Then we can see about posting their photos here on Flyertalk.
This will not get better until we bring this unacceptable behavior to a screeching halt. Baltimore BWI is the only airport that has rules against taking photos of any security, so find other means to deal with those TSA screeners there.
Originally Posted by oneofthosepeopleyouloveto hate
(Post 9828614)
I could be wrong about this, as I haven't read this part of the SOP lately, but I believe if you refuse to remove your shoes for a medical reason, AND you alarm a metal detector, your shoes HAVE to go through the X-ray.
And this makes sense, because how would be know whether it's a brace, shank or knife that's causing the alarm? Now the OP didn't tell us whether he alarmed the mag, but if he did, the TSOs actually were following the SOP. If he *didn't* alarm the mag, he needs to make this clear in his complaint letter .. otherwise, the person in authority who reads this may assume the passenger simply didn't understand the procedure and what was required of him. Well, I did not alarm . . . and that's one of the things the WTMD guy should have communicated to the penalty box attendent. The second guy was totally clueless as to what got me to him unless they used ASL or ESP. You know what they say about assume. If I did alarm, that's what the wand is for - to pinpoint where the metal is or to determine the WTMD alarm was false. Don't the screeners call this "clearing an alarm." Unless the wand alarms at the shoe(s), they stay on. There is no reason to xray a shoe if a hip replacement causes the alarm. That's why the pat down, right?
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
(Post 9828582)
Only if your shoes were going to explode.
Originally Posted by Superguy
(Post 9828159)
:rolleyes: :td:
Orthopedic shoes are a medical reason for not removing shoes per TSA's website. Many people cannot remove those shoes without pain and difficulty. This isn't a matter of asserting one's rights. This is a matter of TSA breaking down and harassing a pax based on VALID reason that is exempt per their OWN policy. Taking the path of least resistance is what enables this crap to continue. Kudos to the OP for standing up to these idiots. ^ To DLFan2 - my shoes are normal looking. But to get them on and off I practically have to take the shoelaces out. Bending and twisting the foot and ankle to do otherwise causes intense pain. I refuse to wear the velcro "monster boots" until absolutely necessary, which may be never if I'm lucky. I do however sleep with a foot brace to avoid the bending. Walking shoeless is a bear for more than a few careful steps . . . special shower clogs work OK. |
Well, if so, that's stupid. If you have metal inside your body they certainly don't make you go through the x-ray machine. A leg brace/orthopedic shoe combination isn't particularly different. If I did alarm, that's what the wand is for - to pinpoint where the metal is or to determine the WTMD alarm was false. Don't the screeners call this "clearing an alarm." Unless the wand alarms at the shoe(s), they stay on. There is no reason to xray a shoe if a hip replacement causes the alarm. That's why the pat down, right? |
I could be wrong about this, as I haven't read this part of the SOP lately, but I believe if you refuse to remove your shoes for a medical reason, AND you alarm a metal detector, your shoes HAVE to go through the X-ray. |
Originally Posted by CPT Trips
(Post 9825579)
I reminded her she was not a police officer, and I that because the cards dangling from her lanyard, were turned around and not readable, I had no idea who or what she was. After more conversation including her telling me it was none of my business who she was, she told me her name was Lisa. But she never turned her ID so it was visible.
How about requiring TSOs, etc. to carry business cards (handed out on demand) that can be used to ID them? They don't have the person's full name, perhaps a first name and a unique ID, plus a way to contact their supervisor and a mailing address compliments, comments, complaints etc. |
Originally Posted by Cee
(Post 9827793)
CPT trips...check out the Honeytoes retailatory treatment thread. That happened to her at PHL and she has a lot of good info with phone numbers and names posted. Maybe PM her and she can help you.
|
Originally Posted by ralfp
(Post 9830523)
A person acting under the guise of Federal authority should be required to identify themselves and show ID to any member of the public upon request. Obviously there would have to be exceptions (emergencies, undercover officers, etc.), but a TSO, FAA inspector, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs :) etc. should lose the power associated with their position the moment the refuse to show their ID (again, within reason). I'd say it's much more important to verify the identity of someone acting under the guise of Federal authority than it is to verify the identity of some random person being searched.
Mike |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.