Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Since when are mL's a unit of weight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 3:56 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palm Coast, FL (DAB) USA
Posts: 242
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
All the answers are here: http://imdb.com/title/tt0387808/
After checking out the flick on imdb, I decided to take a look..... My kind of video. I'm #179 on the reserve list at our local library, who owns about 12 copies.... It must have a cult following, I had never heard of it before, and it certainly hasn't shown up on any of my trans-atlantic/pacific United flights as an option .

BTW, yes, grams/pounds are mass, not weight.... Weight needs to factor in the force of gravity.
wb8iny is offline  
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 7:14 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.

I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 7:32 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 430
[QUOTE=wb8iny;7389868] I'm #179 on the reserve list at our local library, who owns about 12 copies.... QUOTE]

Blockbuster? Hollywood video? Cable MoD?
Travellin' Fool is offline  
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 9:12 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SJC
Programs: UA 1K; SPG Gold
Posts: 414
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.
Anvils aren't liquid.

Though I do wish mercury were easier to obtain in quantity.
frink is offline  
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 9:21 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited500k30 Nights20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.

I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.
1 cc of water = 1g, not 1 mg.
Superguy is offline  
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 9:31 pm
  #21  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BOS
Programs: JetBlue Mosiac, Hainan Fortune Wings, Delta
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
All the answers are here: http://imdb.com/title/tt0387808/
Strange place to find out Mike Judge made a 'new' film. But then again, I think it was 2002 before I found Office Space.

Thanks for the link, although I'm almost afraid to watch it for fear of massive depression.
Skillet is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 5:56 am
  #22  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: IAH
Programs: formerly UA GS, now lowly MM lifetime gold :(
Posts: 1,205
Originally Posted by Yaatri
Strictly speaking, neither are Kg, g or mg.
True. But here on earth, the difference is semantic.
osxanalyst is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 7:14 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Sunshine State
Programs: Deltaworst Peon Level, TSA "Layer 21 Club", NW WP RIP
Posts: 11,372
Clean Up at Security Aisle 3

Originally Posted by tlr
Like the guy at JFK who told people to throw away their liquids because they weren't labelled, so he "couldn't see what they weigh."
What happens when a pax takes a 1 oz hotel shampoo bottle, relabels it "Contents: 5000 US Gallons", and hands it to the JFK dude above in an Approved Kwart Kip Zip?
Flaflyer is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 7:25 am
  #24  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22,778
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.

I'm convinced I could take a Wile E. Coyote Acme anvil in my Freedom Baggie with "3.4oz" on the side of it and get through most checkpoints.
Sorry, I beg to differ with you. You are of b a factor of a thousand. You probably meant that 1cc of water has a mass of 1 gram.
Yaatri is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 7:27 am
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NRT
Programs: Tokyo Monorail Diamond-Encrusted-Platinum
Posts: 10,047
Originally Posted by Flaflyer
What happens when a pax takes a 1 oz hotel shampoo bottle, relabels it "Contents: 5000 US Gallons", and hands it to the JFK dude above in an Approved Kwart Kip Zip?
I bet that the aforementioned dude would confiscate the shampoo bottle because ... how is he supposed to know if 5000 US gallons is less or more than 100ml?

I'm also willing to bet that you could re-label all of your shampoo mini-bottles with words to the effect of "Contents: 99ml liquid sarin" and walk straight past 99% of airport security dudes without any questions. (But be ready for a shower of bullets coming your way when you meet the exception to this rule).

- just so you know that this is intended as humour.

Last edited by jib71; Mar 13, 2007 at 7:36 am
jib71 is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 9:47 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,343
[QUOTE] Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much View Post
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.[
/QUOTE]

My bad -- I typed too fast last night. It's 1 gram of weight -- not 1mg
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 10:40 am
  #27  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: IAH
Programs: formerly UA GS, now lowly MM lifetime gold :(
Posts: 1,205
[QUOTE=FliesWay2Much;7394099]
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much View Post
Let's not confuse them, folks...

The whole metric thing was based on 1cc of distilled water weighing 1mg and occupying 1ml of volume.[
/QUOTE]

My bad -- I typed too fast last night. It's 1 gram of weight -- not 1mg
As I was corrected by Yaatri, its 1 gram of mass. But as I posted earlier, the difference between mass and weight on earth (near sea-level) is semantic.
osxanalyst is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 10:49 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Florida
Programs: Delta
Posts: 46
this is madness!!
hondsps is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 7:57 am
  #29  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ABE/PHL
Programs: CO Pt Infinite (1k life)/ 1MM - NW/DL Silver life/1 MM
Posts: 1,309
[QUOTE=osxanalyst;7394418]
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much

As I was corrected by Yaatri, its 1 gram of mass. But as I posted earlier, the difference between mass and weight on earth (near sea-level) is semantic.
No it's not - it is quite important. It is just our everyday life experience is 9.8 m/sec^2 and that is only at sea level and also where all the mass/weight conversions are supposedly done.

And for the the mass of mL record, 1 g at 4 degrees C. Water is unique in that its density is a maximum instead of more or less linear function as most other compounds.
carpboy is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 8:03 am
  #30  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: IAH
Programs: formerly UA GS, now lowly MM lifetime gold :(
Posts: 1,205
[QUOTE=carpboy;7400326]
Originally Posted by osxanalyst

No it's not - it is quite important. It is just our everyday life experience is 9.8 m/sec^2 and that is only at sea level and also where all the mass/weight conversions are supposedly done.

And for the the mass of mL record, 1 g at 4 degrees C. Water is unique in that its density is a maximum instead of more or less linear function as most other compounds.
Like I said, semantic. My undergrad degree was in Mech Engineering with a focus on fluid mechanics, so I know all the scientific nuances. But for the everyday person the distinction between the two is irrelevant.
osxanalyst is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.