Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA Allowed to Unionize!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 4:33 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seattle WA
Programs: Kimpton IC, Hyatt Diamond, Gold Marriott, Lifetime Platinum Starwood
Posts: 8,664
TSA Allowed to Unionize!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...021501811.html

Unbelievable. . is the Congresss so "out of touch" with what is going on with this agency that they're now allowing them to unionize? This would mean nobody would be let go, the costs would be even more astronomical for the absolute incompetence of these people, and there would be no recourse. . .this is a sad day.

I've called my congresspeople, Nancy Pelosi's office, and the media about the most recent incident that occurred to me in SFO 2 weeks ago. No return calls/no action.

This is just amazing. Now their wages will be more, their benefits more, and yet we continue to receive horrendous service by people on a "power trip" thinking that they are protecting our country.

My solution: Bring the folks home from Iraq and give them these jobs instead of the current batch of incompetents.
ldsant is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 4:50 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orlando,FL
Programs: US2,SPG Gold,Delta Silver,Hilton Gold
Posts: 55
Get a clue!

Before you put all 43,000 screeners under one "incompetent" umbrella you might wwant to do a little research. Sure there are those screeners that are on a powertrip, and I am sorry that you might be a little incovenienced by their actions.

The truth is there are many screeners who take their jobs seriously, and many of them have served in the armed forces the the first two gulf wars. The TSA gives hiring preference to veterans. My father is one of them.

I have had many discussions with him concerning TSA policy and the many absurd policies currently in place. I don't agree with many of them and neither does he.

However, as a veteran he appreciates the opportunity the TSA has given him and does his job with pride. Despite the fact that he has been verbally abused and physically threatened by overzealous frequequent fliers who think they are so important they are exempt from the rules. His pay is peanuts and the benefits are not on a par with the other Federal agencies. Their human resources department is outsourced and completely useless and the TSA senior management does not care about their people.

That is why they need a collective bargaining agreement...............
OrlandoFlyBoy is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 4:56 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 259
Originally Posted by OrlandoFlyBoy
His pay is peanuts and the benefits are not on a par with the other Federal agencies. Their human resources department is outsourced and completely useless and the TSA senior management does not care about their people.

That is why they need a collective bargaining agreement...............
If it's that bad, he should quit and find something better. If he's not skilled enough for something better, too bad.

Monopolizing the workforce to artificially inflate wages does nothing but raise costs and lower returns for everyone. Unions are for the lazy (and the late 1800's).
jk2317 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 5:05 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
The post title is a bit misleading. The proposal simply passed a committee, not signed or approved by Senate or House yet, and the president has vowed to veto it. So we're a ways away from "TSA allowed to unionize".
flyinbob is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 5:20 pm
  #5  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LAX-TPE-LAX
Programs: No more status...just doing my best in burning my points/miles.
Posts: 2,021
Originally Posted by jk2317
If it's that bad, he should quit and find something better. If he's not skilled enough for something better, too bad.

Monopolizing the workforce to artificially inflate wages does nothing but raise costs and lower returns for everyone. Unions are for the lazy (and the late 1800's).
Don't forget reducing the quality of output.
party_boy is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 5:21 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by jk2317
If it's that bad, he should quit and find something better. If he's not skilled enough for something better, too bad.

Monopolizing the workforce to artificially inflate wages does nothing but raise costs and lower returns for everyone. Unions are for the lazy (and the late 1800's).
Ah, the same love it or leave it rationale that people on the forum get all riled up about when used against them.

As in, if you don't like the TSA, then don't fly!
law dawg is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 5:31 pm
  #7  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by law dawg
As in, if you don't like the TSA, then don't fly!
Tough cookies.

If you can't handle the heat, by all means get out of the kitchen.
Spiff is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 5:33 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 252
Originally Posted by flyinbob
The post title is a bit misleading. The proposal simply passed a committee, not signed or approved by Senate or House yet, and the president has vowed to veto it. So we're a ways away from "TSA allowed to unionize".
This is exact! Next time dont read the Washington Post and watch something that offers "fair and balanced" like Fox News...They will tell you the WHOLE story.
sundrop is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 5:37 pm
  #9  
Original Poster
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seattle WA
Programs: Kimpton IC, Hyatt Diamond, Gold Marriott, Lifetime Platinum Starwood
Posts: 8,664
Sorry if the title is "misleading" but to even have this considered is just continuing the "theatre of the absurd" known as the TSA that continues to occur imo.

I find it astounding that somebody would say you don't like the TSA, don't fly! That to me is part of one of the largest problems with the TSA - lack of customer service and civility! FYI - it's also not because of "one TSA agent" but many over the last 5 years.
ldsant is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 6:08 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by Spiff
Tough cookies.

If you can't handle the heat, by all means get out of the kitchen.
Sure, just as soon as you quit your whining.
law dawg is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 6:14 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Originally Posted by ldsant
Sorry if the title is "misleading" but to even have this considered is just continuing the "theatre of the absurd" known as the TSA that continues to occur imo.

I find it astounding that somebody would say you don't like the TSA, don't fly! That to me is part of one of the largest problems with the TSA - lack of customer service and civility! FYI - it's also not because of "one TSA agent" but many over the last 5 years.
For those not paying attention I'll say it again - the argument was made if the TSA father of one of the poster's should quit his job with TSA or suck it up. The same argument could go - quit flying or suck it up.

If you find that line of reasoning uncivil then where's the outrage at lack of civility to that man's father?
law dawg is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 6:32 pm
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Rapids Reward
Posts: 40,088
Originally Posted by law dawg
Ah, the same love it or leave it rationale that people on the forum get all riled up about when used against them.

As in, if you don't like the TSA, then don't fly!
I am always flying out from PHX when I am like with TSA is much better than old security before 9/11. I remember when 9/11 attacks the security is very bad the old security does not good enough. Now on, WSA has been took over all terminals when they need to get a better security. I think last 5 years ago some US Airports has been improvement the security checkpoint. I know few airports has been terribly security: CVG, JAX, SMF, and few others. I remember when I was gotten through checkpoint at JAX in October 2001. The security is very bad when my carry on bag is go through again the x-ray machines. He didn't look it up the monitor after I told him that I don't have anything sharp object. I hear over the news sometimes in mid-2002 when aviation security is improved some few airports is MIA, FLL and few others.
N830MH is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 6:45 pm
  #13  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
50 Countries Visited
5M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 58,133
Originally Posted by law dawg
Sure, just as soon as you quit your whining.
Too bad.

If you can't handle the heat, please feel free to leave the kitchen.

Meanwhile, I'm still flying and filling out that form everytime I pass though a checkpoint.
Spiff is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 6:45 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,683
The TSA needs to be disbanded, not unionized.
Xyzzy is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2007 | 6:47 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,683
Originally Posted by flyinbob
The post title is a bit misleading. The proposal simply passed a committee, not signed or approved by Senate or House yet, and the president has vowed to veto it. So we're a ways away from "TSA allowed to unionize".
We're closer than you think. The measure has already passed the House.
Xyzzy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.