TSA Ticket Security
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 53
TSA Ticket Security
Yesterday I did my 1st mileage run. Since I had several boarding passes in my hand I decided to conduct an experiment. On a few of the legs I had a chance to exit security and re-enter. Each time I re-entered the security line I handed the TSA ticket checker agent an incorrect boarding pass (one from another segment). EVERY airport failed!!! It was pretty funny to look at all of my boarding passes with TSA stamps from incorrect airports on them.
One of the gate agents noticed the stamp and when I explained what happened she said "I am sure Kip would love to hear about that!". I replied "Kip is an idiot", she smiled and I proceeded to board.
One of the gate agents noticed the stamp and when I explained what happened she said "I am sure Kip would love to hear about that!". I replied "Kip is an idiot", she smiled and I proceeded to board.
Last edited by winelover; Oct 22, 2006 at 6:42 am Reason: tired from the trip
#3
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 169
Originally Posted by hawleypatriot
Sounds childish on all counts, but whatever.
IMO, "childish" is the make-believe security we have. The TSA is a bunch of retards playing let's-pretend.
#4
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by hawleypatriot
Sounds childish on all counts, but whatever.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by Seahawk_6
What exactly is "childish" about it? OP basically proved that checkpoint security is largely bull..... How is that "childish"?
IMO, "childish" is the make-believe security we have. The TSA is a bunch of retards playing let's-pretend.
IMO, "childish" is the make-believe security we have. The TSA is a bunch of retards playing let's-pretend.
I think we need a new definition of retards, and of playing pretend.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Childish is the DHS/TSA with knee-jerk overreactions not much different than a tantrum-throwing kid who gets what he wants, either by browbeating the other kids to surrender their candy, by being a petty thief, or by manipulating parents who have no clue how to be good parents.
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by hawleypatriot
One incident self reported by one person with an obvious issue, and which could be completely fictional, makes the case for you that all checkpoint security is largely bs?
I think we need a new definition of retards, and of playing pretend.
I think we need a new definition of retards, and of playing pretend.
Originally Posted by hawleypatriot
Parents everywhere are smiling knowingly at this post. I'm guessing perhaps that you are not one.
Last edited by GUWonder; Oct 22, 2006 at 12:24 pm
#9
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: (MKE+ORD)/2
Programs: UAGM (former 1P), Hilton Gold (former Diamond), heading for dirt.
Posts: 289
It's the date, not the place
From what I understand the TSA is interested in it being a valid boarding pass for the day you are flying. They don't, nor would I expect them to know every airline or flight from their airport.
I think one of the TSA supervisors told me its the date that is important. Before I quit smoking I used to go in and out of security at every non-smoking airport I transferred through. Flight delayed? No problem - outside for another smoke. Even the airports that initialled my boarding pass didn't hassle me when I went through security again with the same BP. If they asked I just told them I was out for a smoke. Never had a problem with this.
I think one of the TSA supervisors told me its the date that is important. Before I quit smoking I used to go in and out of security at every non-smoking airport I transferred through. Flight delayed? No problem - outside for another smoke. Even the airports that initialled my boarding pass didn't hassle me when I went through security again with the same BP. If they asked I just told them I was out for a smoke. Never had a problem with this.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Programs: AA EXP/Marriott Plat/Hertz PC
Posts: 12,724
Originally Posted by hawleypatriot
One incident self reported by one person with an obvious issue, and which could be completely fictional, makes the case for you that all checkpoint security is largely bs?
I think we need a new definition of retards, and of playing pretend.
I think we need a new definition of retards, and of playing pretend.
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
Yes, Hawley. 

No revision needed, given idiocy reigns supremse.
#12
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I believe the bags read "Kip Hawley is an idiot". Does "retard" connote that he has gotten smarter since the bag's initial release? In that case, let's stick with the original.
No revision needed, given idiocy reigns supremse. 
No revision needed, given idiocy reigns supremse. 
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,077
Originally Posted by hawleypatriot
Given your willingness to embrace the term "retard," I guess you're also good with racial epithets as well?
Anyone who had understood my post would recognize that I said " let's stick with the original" -- meaning "idiot" was more appropriate.
Last edited by GUWonder; Oct 22, 2006 at 1:41 pm
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The two have no relationship with one another, but you certainly seem intent on bringing ancillary items into the discussion that have no relationship with matters mentioned earlier in this topic.
Anyone who had understood my post would recognize that I said " let's stick with the original" -- meaning "idiot" was more appropriate.
Anyone who had understood my post would recognize that I said " let's stick with the original" -- meaning "idiot" was more appropriate.

#15
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 169
Originally Posted by hawleypatriot
One incident...
You know, actually my characterization of TSA people as retarded is unfair to retarded people. I've read studies which indicate that they (retarded people) are actually quite good workers at simple tasks. Maybe they should be working checkpoints.





