Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA as MD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 2:58 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Programs: JetBlue TrueBlue, US Air Dividend Miles
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by eyecue
But the GSC cant over rule TSA.
Maybe. Maybe not. They can, however, be the voice of reason when there is an overzealous screener or supervisor trying to make medical decisions for passengers, which they have no business doing.
Cookie Jarvis is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 6:22 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
Originally Posted by Cookie Jarvis
Maybe. Maybe not. They can, however, be the voice of reason when there is an overzealous screener or supervisor trying to make medical decisions for passengers, which they have no business doing.
"Reason" and "TSA" appear to be mutually exclusive concepts.
PatrickHenry1775 is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 7:47 pm
  #48  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SJC
Posts: 5,694
Originally Posted by eyecue
TSO's don't say that "you dont need that."
Read the original post. That's exactly what was said.

Originally Posted by eyecue
Perhaps a bit more planning on the part of a diabetic would be in order to alleivate the possibility of a diabetic crisis on a plane.
As would the TSA gate droids not attempting to be both MDs, dieticians, and security droids at the same time. For many of them that last part seems to be more than they can handle on it's own.

My mom eats what her dietician tells her to eat. With no exceptions - it's pretty explicit. You, nor any other TSADroid is a dietician, so telling her what is necessary is not only wrong but perhaps illegal and hopefully actionable.
JakiChan is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 8:47 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwest Georgia
Programs: Delta, Hilton, ICH, Hertz
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by Spiff
We seriously need some lawsuits against the TSA and perhaps against Comrade Hawley personally.

The guy belongs in prison.
He, like most tyrants, uses others to do his dirty work and claims no responsibility for his stupid policies. Those who do his dirty work say that they are "just doing our jobs" or "we are just enforcing the rules" and pass the buck back upstairs. No one is willing to stand up and say "This is wrong and I won't do it."

I left a government job (a lucrative one I might add) almost 30 years ago because I refused to do things that I considered (and the courts have since ruled) illegal. I was black-balled and had a difficult time getting another job, but I would do it again because it was the right thing to do. Unfortunately, the people in government jobs today don't seem to have the backbone to say no and walk away from something that is wrong. Like those before them who have destroyed lives, property, and liberty by just "doing their job," the DHS and TSA employees of today don't have the conviction of the oath that they took. If they did, they would quit and tell others why they quit. Let's see TSA operate with no employees.

- Alan

Last edited by GeorgiaRebel; Sep 19, 2006 at 9:04 pm
GeorgiaRebel is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 8:55 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwest Georgia
Programs: Delta, Hilton, ICH, Hertz
Posts: 302
Angry

Originally Posted by eyecue
I agree that this whole thing is going too far but, we dont make the rules, we just enforce them.
This is truly a sad situation. If TSA told you to have every third person arrested, would you do it? After all, you said "we dont make the rules, we just enforce them?" Is it asking too much for you to think about what you are enforcing and refuse to enforce stupidity?

Originally Posted by eyecue
Perhaps a bit more planning on the part of a diabetic would be in order to alleivate the possibility of a diabetic crisis on a plane.
Now you are giving medical advice again. Do you have any idea what type of planning is needed for a diabetic (I doubt it)? If you don't then quit trying to justify a position that is based upon wrong assumptions, incomplete knowledge, and dangerous ideas (at least dangerous to the people you "enforce the rules" upon).


- Alan
GeorgiaRebel is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 8:59 pm
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Under an ORD approach path
Programs: DL PM, MM. Coffee isn't a drug, it's a vitamin.
Posts: 12,935
Curious what would happen in a case like this if the passenger called over a LEO and insisted on filing felony charges of practicing medicine without a license. Can the LEO be required to at least file a police report, or could they brush it off?
Gargoyle is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2006 | 9:03 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northwest Georgia
Programs: Delta, Hilton, ICH, Hertz
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by Gargoyle
Curious what would happen in a case like this if the passenger called over a LEO and insisted on filing felony charges of practicing medicine without a license. Can the LEO be required to at least file a police report, or could they brush it off?
When I worked as an LEO in the late 80's in Florida, there was no requirement for me to file a report just becuase citizen X wanted me to. Even if I saw a crime being committed (i.e., you hit someone with a beer bottle), I had no legal requirement to charge you with anything or file a report on the matter.

- Alan
GeorgiaRebel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.