Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What are YOU stepping in?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2006, 2:23 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,485
Originally Posted by Bart
You can always refuse to remove them. However, the screener is then unable to clear you, and this will result in you being escorted off the checkpoint and denied access to the aircraft. It may also mean intervention by law enforcement officers since they may have the basis for reasonable suspicion, but this may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. I, of course, cannot speak on the law enforcement aspects. From a TSA perspective, we were unable to clear you due to your unwillingness to cooperate.
So, in the end, you can force people to remove their shoes. The punishment for failure to do so is not flying and the potential of detention by LEOs. The article (from the OP) is wrong.
ralfp is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 4:34 am
  #32  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Originally Posted by ralfp
So, in the end, you can force people to remove their shoes. The punishment for failure to do so is not flying and the potential of detention by LEOs. The article (from the OP) is wrong.
No one forces you to do anything. You have to weigh your determination to keep your shoes on against your determination to make your flight. If you choose to not cooperate with security, then you don't get to make your flight. But instead of being hauled off to jail, you're merely escorted off the checkpoint. Keep in mind, though, that I'm speaking strictly from a security perspective. From a law enforcement perspective, in some jurisdictions, refusal to cooperate with airport security officers in resolving an alarm may be enough to trigger a law enforcement search and/or detention for questioning.
Bart is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 5:15 am
  #33  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by Bart
LOL. Bartworld is something that has existed for me throughout my life. During all four of my commands, I made it very clear to my subordinates that they were now in Bartworld and I was their God; there were no other gods but Bart and Bart's Law was absolute. I've toned it down with my non-military coworkers in TSA, but the translation is the same. Whether I'm in charge at the checkpoint or baggage screening pod, they are in Bartworld. My screeners clearly understand this simple philosophy.

Bart follows the SOP, but Bart also reserves the right to make common sense intepretation of the SOP which may vary from the way other leads and supervisors interpret the SOP.

It's been a successful recipe for me throughout my life. Why fix it if it ain't broken?
Are you certain it's been successful? Somehow, I don't quite get that it has been.
doober is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 5:16 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PHX
Programs: AA Ex Platinum & 1MM, DL PLT, Marriott Gold, HH Diamond
Posts: 2,490
Originally Posted by Bart
Either be part of the solution or part of the problem, pal.
You know, Bart, there was a time I truly expected better from you, but clearly that time has passed.
txrus is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 5:21 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bellevue,Ne,USA
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by redbeard911
http://news.yahoo.com/s/kgtv/20060703/lo_kgtv/9463455

All those who are surprised raise your hands.
While I agree that walking without shoes at a checkpoint is nasty what about all the things you touch in your everyday life? Not everyone washes their hands regularly. http://www.hygenius.com/importance.htm. How about the recirculated air that you breath in buildings and on passenger aircraft?http://www.webmd.com/content/article/49/39915 How about that new immigrant that you work with everyday that could have TB? http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNew..._name=&no_ads= My point is that germs are everywhere not just on the floor at the airport checkpoint.
omascreener is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 6:02 am
  #36  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,389
Originally Posted by txrus
You know, Bart, there was a time I truly expected better from you, but clearly that time has passed.
Pardon me while I step aside and have an emotional moment.
Bart is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 7:58 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Programs: JetBlue TrueBlue, US Air Dividend Miles
Posts: 412
Much more disgusting than the airport security check point is the restroom door. There are far too many people who go to the restroom, do their business, DO NOT wash their hands, leaving whatever "residue" on the door handle. Yuck!!!!

Also, have you ever noticed how many people DO NOT cover their mouth when they cough or sneeze?
Cookie Jarvis is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 8:05 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, ORD, CVG, NYC
Programs: Former UA 1K, National Exec. Elite
Posts: 5,485
Originally Posted by Bart
No one forces you to do anything. You have to weigh your determination to keep your shoes on against your determination to make your flight. If you choose to not cooperate with security, then you don't get to make your flight. But instead of being hauled off to jail, you're merely escorted off the checkpoint. Keep in mind, though, that I'm speaking strictly from a security perspective. From a law enforcement perspective, in some jurisdictions, refusal to cooperate with airport security officers in resolving an alarm may be enough to trigger a law enforcement search and/or detention for questioning.
If that's not being forced to remove one's shoes, what is (besides the actual phyical act of someone grabbing them and pulling them off you against your will)?

This is like saying that nobody forces me to obey the law; I just get fined or sent to jail if I disobey the law.
ralfp is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 8:43 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: United Milage Plus 1K. Lots of hotel Gold.
Posts: 299
I think Bart finally drank the Kool-Aid
jello2594 is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 9:11 am
  #40  
gre
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: IAD, DCA
Programs: UA-Plat, Marriott-Plat, AAI, AAII
Posts: 3,758
Originally Posted by Bart
Read my post #16. You're taking a piece of what I said in response to someone else's question. Post #16 addresses your concerns more completely.
As I'm the guy from post 16 (thanks for the explanation), let's get down to specifics:

Here's the shoe I have worn for every flight for the last 3 years:

http://www.onlineshoes.com/productpa...en=w&pcid=2579

It does not set off the WTMD. I ask for a swipe instead of removing them. Am I entitled to a swipe? Can I be forced in secondary to take them off even though they do not set off the WTMD (under the threat of "do you want to fly today?")?
gre is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 2:41 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by gre
It does not set off the WTMD. I ask for a swipe instead of removing them. Am I entitled to a swipe?
Oh, you're supposed to be given just the shoe swab, not the full secondary treatment -- but as we know, all too TSA officers love to make up all sorts of nonsense rules on the spot and abuse their authority, so there is no guarantee that TSA officers will actually handle things the way they are supposed to. There are plenty of TSA folks out there who seem to enjoy giving retaliatory secondaries for all sorts of reasons, including to people like you who decline to take their shoes off. That said, my experience has been that usually the TSA has given me just the swab, not the full secondary.
daw617 is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 2:59 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 707
Originally Posted by Bart
This probably won't be much of a hit with this crowd.....

Screener: "Ma'am, I also recommend you remove your shoes..."

Passenger: "You expect me to walk barefoot on these floors?"

Screener: "Oh, don't worry. You won't get our floors dirty."

(True story. This screener has amazing people skills and great sense of humor. The lady took his comment as intended and had a great laugh.)
Hey, I like it. Give that screener a raise!
daw617 is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 4:25 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rochester, MN
Programs: UA GS, AA PLT, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,437
Bart,

Just a question or 4 for you, and a story for the rest of us here.

Yesterday going through security at ORD, which generally is a bastion of some sanity, not total sanity, but some. Approached the checkpoint and was informed that I had to remove my shoes. Fine I was running a little late and had just found out my UA flight was cancelled, so a rebook was in order. Anyway, I removed my shoes and prepared to put on a set of plastic baggies much like what you store vegatbles in. The screener then informed me that all footwear must be removed. This included socks. When I asked him why his response is that we are looking for more than metal, and that the socks must come off. I informed him that I would not remove my socks as I was worried about the cleaniness of the floor. Of course he used the would you like to fly today line. I said I would take the secondary then. To which he responded that was not an option. Further, He physically blocked the WTMD until I had removed my socks. This was also going on at the two other WTMD at the checkpoint. I eventually was "forced" to remove my socks as there was no option to go back as my bags had already cleared through the machine. The supervisor when called over backed up the screener, saying that the screener can require that all footwear come off and that socks constitute footwear. He gave me a complaint form which I filled out and then watched him dump it in a trashcan away from the checkpoint.

Now for the questions. Can a screener actually require that you remove your socks? Do they actually constitute footwear? Can a screener refuse to allow you to pass if you agree to the secondary? And finally, could I have walked away from the checkpoint at that time? (i.e. What happens if your bags have cleared, but you haven't/cannot clear the WTMD because of a screener)
MSY-MSP is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 5:23 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 754
Originally Posted by Cookie Jarvis
Much more disgusting than the airport security check point is the restroom door. There are far too many people who go to the restroom, do their business, DO NOT wash their hands, leaving whatever "residue" on the door handle. Yuck!!!!

Also, have you ever noticed how many people DO NOT cover their mouth when they cough or sneeze?
Yeah, and after they sneeze on their hand, be careful what they touch!

...Ever since I saw that fellow pick up and wipe off the boarding pass he dropped in the urinal I've been quite religious about wearing gloves...
n5667 is offline  
Old Jul 5, 2006, 5:25 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 754
Originally Posted by gre
As I'm the guy from post 16 (thanks for the explanation), let's get down to specifics:

Here's the shoe I have worn for every flight for the last 3 years:

http://www.onlineshoes.com/productpa...en=w&pcid=2579

It does not set off the WTMD. I ask for a swipe instead of removing them. Am I entitled to a swipe? Can I be forced in secondary to take them off even though they do not set off the WTMD (under the threat of "do you want to fly today?")?
Don't usually request those shoes to be removed at our airport - if you don't want to take your shoes off all that is supposed to happen is a swipe.

However, we are supposed to do continuous random screening, so at some airports they may just combine the two...
n5667 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.