FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues-686/)
-   -   Schengen (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/practical-travel-safety-security-issues/443435-schengen.html)

stimpy Jun 15, 2005 2:19 pm


Originally Posted by Dovster
Stimpy, I am very surprised to read that statement from you. Apparently you support the idea of profiling, for example, young male Englishmen when Manchester United is playing a German team. Of course, it is obvious that some of those young men might not even be interested in soccer, much less be hooligans.

The reason I am so surprised is that you have expressed your disagreement with profiling in the past.

How do you justify profiling, say, young Englishmen but not young Arabs?

Dovester, I'm against racial profiling. Some English soccer hooligans ARE Arabs! I don't see a problem profiling drunken young men with St. George's Cross tatoos or face paintings and M-U jerseys on during the eve of a big soccer match. Especially as many of these men are already known to the police due to past transgressions. The British Home Office has kindly informed the police in other countries whom to look out for.

Roger Jun 15, 2005 2:23 pm


Originally Posted by stimpy
The British Home Office has kindly informed the police in other countries whom to look out for.

... and for big matches they send some UK police along to assist the local forces.

Dovster Jun 15, 2005 2:24 pm


Originally Posted by stimpy
Dovester, I'm against racial profiling. Some English soccer hooligans ARE Arabs! I don't see a problem profiling drunken young men with St. George's Cross tatoos or face paintings and M-U jerseys on during the eve of a big soccer match. Especially as many of these men are already known to the police due to past transgressions. The British Home Office has kindly informed the police in other countries whom to look out for.

If their names appear on a list supplied by the British government, then it is not profiling.

Profiling would consist of looking more closely at all young British men coming in during the soccer match. Of course, after talking to them many may well still be allowed to enter the country. Profiling, after all, does not mean automatic banning -- it simply alerts police or security officials to check the profiled individual more closely than they would somebody who does not fit the profile.

GUWonder Jun 15, 2005 2:27 pm


Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
I can see why some people would like Schengen, but I think there's room for improvement from a security perspective. And as a tourist, I like my passport stamps. :D

I don't like passport stamps. I prefer my passports thin.

Is there any reason to think a majority of people in the Schengen countries want Schengen tossed out today or tomorrow?

Roger Jun 15, 2005 2:33 pm


Originally Posted by GUWonder
I don't like passport stamps. I prefer my passports thin.

Me too, though I'm happy for those who want them to get them on a voluntary basis, like at some tourist sites :p .


Originally Posted by GUWonder
Is there any reason to think a majority of people in the Schengen countries want Schengen tossed out today or tomorrow?

Absolutely none, though I recognise that as a mere European, I can't be expected to know much about the 'People's Republic of Europe' :rolleyes: .

Doppy Jun 15, 2005 2:38 pm


Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
Oh, come on! You really think there’s border security? For the most part, they have absolutely no idea who’s entering they country after the initial point of entry.

Same thing with the US - once you're in, you're in.

I don't see what your point is.


Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
There’s ETA in France and Spain, the IRA in Ireland and the U.K., and countless other groups. Not to mention drug and human smugglers that get into Italy and then have easy access - thanks to Schengen - to all the other countries.

The ETA is in Spain. It probably has little reason to go to Germany.

If drug and human smuggers are getting into Italy, shouldn't the problem be fixed in Italy, rather than the border between Spain and France?

Drug smugglers get drugs into Florida and then are able to bring them to New York. Are you advocating for border checks at every state?

You're advocating something that will come with a huge price tag but which will have questionable benefits. Not worth it.

hockeyinsider Jun 15, 2005 3:22 pm


Originally Posted by Doppy
Same thing with the US - once you're in, you're in.

I don't see what your point is.

My point is if I fly into Amsterdam and get past passport control, that's it.

I can go ANYWHERE I want and nobody will know.

hockeyinsider Jun 15, 2005 3:25 pm


Originally Posted by Roger
Me too, though I'm happy for those who want them to get them on a voluntary basis, like at some tourist sites :p .


Absolutely none, though I recognise that as a mere European, I can't be expected to know much about the 'People's Republic of Europe' :rolleyes: .

Here's an idea:

Schengen only applies to member country citizens. If I'm American and I fly from Brussels to Copenhagen, I still have to clear Danish passport control, but a Belgian citizen wouldn't. Simple idea that would work well.

whirledtraveler Jun 15, 2005 3:39 pm


Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
My point is if I fly into Amsterdam and get past passport control, that's it.

I can go ANYWHERE I want and nobody will know.

So what? I can travel from Florida to Georgia and no one will know. Sure it's the same country but what difference does that make? Europe has fewer people and a smaller geographic area.

whirledtraveler Jun 15, 2005 3:41 pm


Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
Here's an idea:

Schengen only applies to member country citizens. If I'm American and I fly from Brussels to Copenhagen, I still have to clear Danish passport control, but a Belgian citizen wouldn't. Simple idea that would work well.

I'm still not sure what problem you are trying to solve -- what problem that we must have much worse in the US because of our large population and wide area. You just seem upset that Europe has less security than you'd like. Where's the problem? Where's the data indicating a problem?

LHR/MEL/Europe FF Jun 15, 2005 4:01 pm

hockeyinsider

Hi.

What I can't see from your original post, or subsequent postings is how this affects you and why you have a problem with it?

Yes - some people, such as those you mention from Germany, may have a problem, but it is from an economic standpoint - not terrorism. They don't want an influx of people coming to the country and taking jobs.

Terrorism, as pointed out elsewhere above has been around in Europe for centuries. Most recently the UK has had to deal with the IRA, Spain with ETA. But we have effective national security agencies that monitor suspects and act accordingly.

As you are from the US - if you have a problem with security in Europe - don't go! There are many more people, especially those on business, that appreciate the freedom afforded by the Schengen agreement. Not least it saves $$ with time not wasted at border control.

Rest assured - anyone now coming from Europe has to pass through stringent security here in the US before being allowed in.

Regards

WG

hockeyinsider Jun 15, 2005 4:09 pm

Am I the only one that misses my passport stamps? :D :confused:


I understand why some people like Schengen, but I just think Europe is slowly moving in the opposite direction. Just look at the recent 'no' votes, the immigration reforms in Denmark and other countries, the issue of mass immigration from the east, etc, etc.

Oh well.

stimpy Jun 15, 2005 4:10 pm


Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF
hockeyinsider

What I can't see from your original post, or subsequent postings is how this affects you and why you have a problem with it?

He already stated his problem. He wants to get passport stamps at each border. I say he should fly into each country from a non-Schengen country and then he will have his passport stamps. ;) Enough of this silliness.

GUWonder Jun 15, 2005 4:20 pm


Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
Here's an idea:

Schengen only applies to member country citizens. If I'm American and I fly from Brussels to Copenhagen, I still have to clear Danish passport control, but a Belgian citizen wouldn't. Simple idea that would work well.

Bad idea unless you want to increase the public payrolls and raid the treasury.

GUWonder Jun 15, 2005 4:22 pm


Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
My point is if I fly into Amsterdam and get past passport control, that's it.

I can go ANYWHERE I want and nobody will know.

If the Dutch and the bordering states' citizens don't care, why should you care?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:06 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.