![]() |
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
I am a political science student with previous employment experience in Europe and Washington, D.C. and I feel my statement is quite accurate.
Many in the E.U. wish to ditch the respective nat’l identities and move towards the world one European thing. Thankfully, the public doesn’t want that, as evident by the recent no votes in France and the Netherlands. Moreover, most of Europe’s governments would be quite leftist compared to the U.S. administration. I have only visited 39 US states - probably more than most FTers, I guess, and possibly more even than you - but I know you cannot generalise about people in the US. What people in Maine believe can be very different from what the good ol' boys in the South believe, and Californians are different again, just to give examples that many will sympathise with. Just as you can't generalise about the US, you can't do so with the greater population of the EU either (or 'Europe' as you call it). It's clear that we disagree quite profoundly and there's no point in continuing this kind of debate. I'm off to do something more productive ;) . |
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
Oh, come on! You really think there’s border security? For the most part, they have absolutely no idea who’s entering they country after the initial point of entry.
Just look at all those terrorists in Germany before September 11 and the freedom of movement that they had … who knows what they could have done! Unlike Europe, the American states are not sovereign countries and have absolutely no authority to have border checks. European nations are sovereign and it’s quite unfortunate that leftist politicians have destroyed security in a move towards a People’s Republic of Europe. (Edited post to remove a typo, new word is in bold) [sarcasm]Oh, come on! You really think there’s border security? For the most part, the US has absolutely no idea who’s entering the country after the initial point of entry. Just look at all those terrorists in the United States on September 11 and the freedom of movement that they had … who knows what they could have done! Unlike America, the European states are under Brussels' thumb and have their authorities checked. American states are not under Brussels' thumb and it’s quite unfortunate that rightist politicians have destroyed security in a move against being under Brussels' thumb.[/sarcasm] |
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
I am a political science student with previous employment experience in Europe and Washington, D.C. and I feel my statement is quite accurate.
Many in the E.U. wish to ditch the respective nat’l identities and move towards a one-nation Europe Thankfully, the public doesn’t want that, as evident by the recent no votes in France and the Netherlands. Moreover, most of Europe’s governments would be quite leftist compared to the U.S. administration. What Europeans want for their individual countries and for the EU is their business. I am not a big believer in meddling in the internal affairs of democratic countries and imposing (or trying to impose) my way. ;) Extra-territoriality is troublesome. The explicit intent to engage in such is even more so. Unnecessary foreign entanglements. I think someone warned us about that a long time ago. |
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
Europe doesn't have a terrorism problem, at least not to the degree that anything has to be done about it.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
A cheap attempt at sarcasm, reason be gone:
[sarcasm]Oh, come on! You really think there’s border security? For the most part, the US has absolutely no idea who’s entering the country after the initial point of entry. Just look at all those terrorists in the United States on September 11 and the freedom of movement that they had … who knows what they could have done! Unlike America, the European states are under Brussels' thumb and have their authorities checked. American states are not under Brussels' thumb and it’s quite unfortunate that rightist politicians have destroyed security in a move against being under Brussels' thumb.[/sarcasm] I was watching a news segement on the "European Journal" TV program produced in Brussels and circulated on America's PBS network. It talked about how German border security agents wish the old-style checks were still around today and they talked about all the smuggling and other illegal activity. |
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
Are you kidding?
There’s ETA in France and Spain, the IRA in Ireland and the U.K., and countless other groups. Not to mention drug and human smugglers that get into Italy and then have easy access - thanks to Schengen - to all the other countries. |
Originally Posted by stimpy
It's the opposite. Europe has always had terrorism, but the US doesn't seriously have a terrorism problem. The US had the horrible attack on 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing. That's it. Europeans have had terrorism for as long as there has been a Europe. In the 20th century alone there were thousands of terrorist attacks in Europe.
|
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
There's no such thing as an European state. Europe is not one-nation and it doesn't look that will happen anytime soon.
Originally Posted by hockeyinsider
I was watching a news segement on the "European Journal" TV program produced in Brussels and circulated on America's PBS network. It talked about how German border security agents wish the old-style checks were still around today and they talked about all the smuggling and other illegal activity.
If certain German border security agents believe there is a real problem, then they could appropriately lobby their superiors and the public to change matters. If they are right about the "need", make a compelling argument which can convince a critical mass, and are determined, then it shouldn't be too hard for them to "succeed" if they are smart and effective. |
Originally Posted by whirledtraveler
I stand corrected. At the very least, then, they have the good sense not to panic and do things that don't seem quite geared toward solving the problem but sound nice.
|
Originally Posted by stimpy
That is one of the major reasons I prefer to live in Europe. The reaction to 9/11 in the US has been horrible. Much of it makes me embarrased to be an American. I happened to be in Europe during 9/11 and while the Europeans were of course horrified, life went on as normal. They don't live in fear perhaps because terrorism isn't anything new to them.
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Thank you for sharing the obvious. :D
People would never be motivated by petty self-interest, including job security and ego. Never. :rolleyes: If certain German border security agents believe there is a real problem, then they could appropriately lobby their superiors and the public to change matters. If they are right about the "need", make a compelling argument which can convince a critical mass, and are determined, then it shouldn't be too hard for them to "succeed" if they are smart and effective. |
They did and still do enforce border control when they are afraid of soccer hooligans entering their country to cause havoc. It is quite simple to stop a bunch of passengers on a EZ jet flight who fit a profile. Same for those who drive in. But that doesn't affect the rest of us.
As a business traveler, I love Schengen! |
Originally Posted by Kibison
No doubt. Gets old having to tell folks I'm from Canada but at least I don't get dirty looks or Bush jokes.
When I lived in Canada and commuted daily to work in the States, I had a Bush sticker on my automobile and a Bush sign in my yard at my Canadian house. hehe :) |
Originally Posted by stimpy
They did and still do enforce border control when they are afraid of soccer hooligans entering their country to cause havoc. It is quite simple to stop a bunch of passengers on a EZ jet flight who fit a profile. Same for those who drive in. But that doesn't affect the rest of us.
The reason I am so surprised is that you have expressed your disagreement with profiling in the past. On a thread dealing precisely with that, intobsv posted, "I guess I will never understand people that say that Middle Eastern looking people should not be targeted by airline security personnel. Please explain to me why a 65 year old woman is as much a danger as a 24 year old Arab Muslim." Your reply in the following post was a sarcastic, "I think we should profile all blond haired blue-eyed people with short hair. You never know when another Timothy McVeigh could be lurking out there." How do you justify profiling, say, young Englishmen but not young Arabs? |
Originally Posted by stimpy
They did and still do enforce border control when they are afraid of soccer hooligans entering their country to cause havoc. It is quite simple to stop a bunch of passengers on a EZ jet flight who fit a profile. Same for those who drive in. But that doesn't affect the rest of us.
As a business traveler, I love Schengen! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.