Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Reading the ticket sleeve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2005 | 8:34 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Programs: TSA
Posts: 2,745
Reading the ticket sleeve

Yesterday I was reading the BP sleeve for a well known carrier and I was surprised by a few things:
1. The prohibited items list on the sleeve still mentions metal nail files and corkscrews!
2. The limits of liability on luggage items. The carrier is not liable for any damage to your suitcase! Especially if they claim that you packed it wrong. This includes zippers, wheels and handles. Also there is an itemized list of things that they arent liable for and it is all inclusive. The only thing that it appears they cover is loss of clothing. Optical equipment, electronics, books, papers EVERYTHING is exempt from coverage! ESPECIALLY if you carry it on! This sleeve was printed in 2005.
eyecue is offline  
Old May 9, 2005 | 9:43 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by eyecue
Yesterday I was reading the BP sleeve for a well known carrier and I was surprised by a few things:
1. The prohibited items list on the sleeve still mentions metal nail files and corkscrews!
2. The limits of liability on luggage items. The carrier is not liable for any damage to your suitcase! Especially if they claim that you packed it wrong. This includes zippers, wheels and handles. Also there is an itemized list of things that they arent liable for and it is all inclusive. The only thing that it appears they cover is loss of clothing. Optical equipment, electronics, books, papers EVERYTHING is exempt from coverage! ESPECIALLY if you carry it on! This sleeve was printed in 2005.
They can print up all the protection they want, but those words do not protect them from negligence. I have had six claims of damaged bags in the past seven years, and United (in one case, SAS) has paid for all of the repairs.

The big difference is the age of the bag. For example, if you have some generic brand bag from the 1970s versus a TravelPro, you're probably not going to get redeemed for the damage.
LessO2 is offline  
Old May 9, 2005 | 10:34 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
5M
100 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus. Eurobonus Millionaire
Posts: 38,713
EVERYTHING is exempt from coverage! ESPECIALLY if you carry it on!
How could you claim a baggage problem for a carryon bag? I can't picture very many scenarios where the airline would be responsible for damage.
Xyzzy is offline  
Old May 9, 2005 | 12:14 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
These attempts by carriers to exculpate themselves from liability for baggage are one reason why many of us try to carry on what we have to take on a trip. Of course, another reason is the frequency with which airlines manage to misplace checked baggage.
PatrickHenry1775 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.