Last edit by: Nayef
Copied from Xyzzy's post:
I think this sums up what to do pretty well:
I think this sums up what to do pretty well:
- Airline checkin in the US for departure to EU
- Right now you can show either EU or US (but airline execs I know and have discussed this with suggest giving the airline your US passport).
- In the future, when ETIAS comes into force, show the EU passport to the airline because the EU will require that data to be sent ahead of the flight.
- re: the above two comments, it currently doesn't matter which you use from a US perspective. If you are a US citizen, departing the US on an EU passport you've not entered the US with is not going to cause any problems.
- Immigration on arrival in the EU
- Show the EU passport because you are a citizen and many/most countries require citizens to show their passports to enter.
- Airline checkin in the EU for departure to the US
- Show your US passport to the airline as the US requires you to enter on your US passport and APIS data sent ahead of the flight needs to contain your US data.
- Immigration departing the EU
- Show the EU passport that you entered the EU with. The fact that you gave a different passport to the airline will not cause any problem.
- At the gate for a flight departing to the US: You may be asked to verify your travel documents at the gate before departure and so only show your US passport in this case.
- Immigration arriving the US
- Show the US passport you showed to the airline.
Dual Citizen Traveling from/to the US, which Passport to show/use, where?
#541
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Colorado (anywhere between DEN DMM BAH)
Programs: United MileagePlus, SkyMiles, AAdvantage, NEXUS
Posts: 3,035
We could use the perspectives of US-AU/NZ dual citizens as AU and NZ have had ETA programs for a while without major incident as far as I know whether it's departing the US or not.
If I may add a couple of anecdotal experiences, many of my friends are US-born Saudis and many have different spellings on their names in both passports. They've all been coming and going using both passports for years and years regardless of how the name on their ticket is spelled and they don't typically purchase two one-way tickets. They always get regular round-trip tickets and even when going through Saudi entry or exit immigration, or entering the US, the difference in spelling between the boarding pass and passport has never been an issue whatsoever. I don't know how it works on the airline side in this case, but given the experiences I've accumulated, it seems that airlines have a known mechanism to not add a dual citizen's info to APIS once they show a US passport regardless of the name or the spelling. I even know people who literally have different names altogether in both passports and this still hasn't been an issue when traveling to and from the US.
Last Christmas, I traveled using both my Saudi and US passports for the first time ever, and of course Saudi passports require a visa for the US. My name is exactly the same in both passports (Saudi doesn't officially allow dual citizenship if naturalized unless a person is privileged enough to get approval for it from the ministry of interior, or else it's perfectly legal if they're born dual citizens whether it's through a non-Saudi mother or in a place that grants birthright citizenship, though they don't scrutinize things if someone is naturalized unless something else pops up and they don't check for visas or anything when leaving Saudi, but just in case I kept my name as is in both passports to make things easier).
When I checked into my flight to BAH with a layover in LHR (flying to BAH is the same as flying into or out of any Saudi or GCC airport), at DEN I only showed the airline my Saudi passport, and I used my Saudi passport at TSA. Used it all the way until BAH. When I came back, I checked in with the airlines using my US passport and then went through Bahraini exit immigration with my Saudi passport, after that used my US passport at LHR and then all the way to DEN. There was no issue at all with record-keeping just because I never used my US passport anywhere when I flew DEN-LHR-BAH, and I'm a member of NEXUS so I was able to use the GE kiosk just fine, and this is with having a passport that outright requires a visa, not even some sort of ETA.
I don't imagine this will be an issue at all for US-EU dual nationals, just like it hasn't been for US-AU/NZ citizens, and there might be some growing pains to start, perhaps more so for those who have EU residence permits, but I don't think a huge alarm needs to be sounded over it, even if there are some issues at the beginning. One of the abandoned plans was to do a six-month trial run for ETIAS in 2022 (then it was slated in 2023) so it wouldn't surprised me if they still opt for that whenever the hell it's implemented. It'll be prudent to also keep an eye on the UK ETA and any issues arising from that (if any) as it seems like it'll begin before ETIAS, and I'm sure it'll be set up in a way that accommodates US-UK dual citizens or US/ETA citizens with ILR.
If I may add a couple of anecdotal experiences, many of my friends are US-born Saudis and many have different spellings on their names in both passports. They've all been coming and going using both passports for years and years regardless of how the name on their ticket is spelled and they don't typically purchase two one-way tickets. They always get regular round-trip tickets and even when going through Saudi entry or exit immigration, or entering the US, the difference in spelling between the boarding pass and passport has never been an issue whatsoever. I don't know how it works on the airline side in this case, but given the experiences I've accumulated, it seems that airlines have a known mechanism to not add a dual citizen's info to APIS once they show a US passport regardless of the name or the spelling. I even know people who literally have different names altogether in both passports and this still hasn't been an issue when traveling to and from the US.
Last Christmas, I traveled using both my Saudi and US passports for the first time ever, and of course Saudi passports require a visa for the US. My name is exactly the same in both passports (Saudi doesn't officially allow dual citizenship if naturalized unless a person is privileged enough to get approval for it from the ministry of interior, or else it's perfectly legal if they're born dual citizens whether it's through a non-Saudi mother or in a place that grants birthright citizenship, though they don't scrutinize things if someone is naturalized unless something else pops up and they don't check for visas or anything when leaving Saudi, but just in case I kept my name as is in both passports to make things easier).
When I checked into my flight to BAH with a layover in LHR (flying to BAH is the same as flying into or out of any Saudi or GCC airport), at DEN I only showed the airline my Saudi passport, and I used my Saudi passport at TSA. Used it all the way until BAH. When I came back, I checked in with the airlines using my US passport and then went through Bahraini exit immigration with my Saudi passport, after that used my US passport at LHR and then all the way to DEN. There was no issue at all with record-keeping just because I never used my US passport anywhere when I flew DEN-LHR-BAH, and I'm a member of NEXUS so I was able to use the GE kiosk just fine, and this is with having a passport that outright requires a visa, not even some sort of ETA.
I don't imagine this will be an issue at all for US-EU dual nationals, just like it hasn't been for US-AU/NZ citizens, and there might be some growing pains to start, perhaps more so for those who have EU residence permits, but I don't think a huge alarm needs to be sounded over it, even if there are some issues at the beginning. One of the abandoned plans was to do a six-month trial run for ETIAS in 2022 (then it was slated in 2023) so it wouldn't surprised me if they still opt for that whenever the hell it's implemented. It'll be prudent to also keep an eye on the UK ETA and any issues arising from that (if any) as it seems like it'll begin before ETIAS, and I'm sure it'll be set up in a way that accommodates US-UK dual citizens or US/ETA citizens with ILR.
#542
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NYC
Programs: AA 2MM, Bonvoy LTT, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,660
Additional evidence that 22 CFR 53.2 (unlawful for US citizen to enter/exit US without a valid US passport) is effecitvely neutered.
Note the "soft" word "expectation" being used instead of stronger language such as unlawful or must. And they only "expect" you to use US passport returnnig to US.
ESTA FAQ
https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/faq?lang=en...application%3F
If you have dual citizenship and have registered with ESTA, you should use your VWP-eligible passport to board the plane when you leave your country of departure and when you arrive in the U.S. If both your countries of citizenship are VWP-eligible, then we strongly recommend you choose which one you want to claim for purposes of travel to the U.S., and use that country's passport each time you travel. One person with two different ESTA authorizations creates confusion that will only delay your travel.
If you are a citizen of the U.S., and also of a VWP country, you should not be applying for ESTA. One of the requirements of being a naturalized U.S. citizen is that you apply for, and use, a U.S. passport for your travels. While we are aware that in some cases, naturalized U.S. citizens use their alternate country's passport to travel, our expectation is that you will use the U.S. passport to travel from another country to the U.S. at both points of travel, departing the foreign country, and arriving into the U.S.
A number of reddit post indicating ESTA still gets approved despite listing US passport as additional citizenship.
Note the "soft" word "expectation" being used instead of stronger language such as unlawful or must. And they only "expect" you to use US passport returnnig to US.
ESTA FAQ
https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/faq?lang=en...application%3F
What if I have dual citizenship and/or have a passport from more than one country?
Each Visa Waiver Program traveler must have an approved travel authorization for the passport they plan to use before they travel to the United States. If a traveler obtains a new passport, they must submit a new travel authorization application in ESTA using the new passport. A processing fee will be charged for each new application submitted.If you have dual citizenship and have registered with ESTA, you should use your VWP-eligible passport to board the plane when you leave your country of departure and when you arrive in the U.S. If both your countries of citizenship are VWP-eligible, then we strongly recommend you choose which one you want to claim for purposes of travel to the U.S., and use that country's passport each time you travel. One person with two different ESTA authorizations creates confusion that will only delay your travel.
If you are a citizen of the U.S., and also of a VWP country, you should not be applying for ESTA. One of the requirements of being a naturalized U.S. citizen is that you apply for, and use, a U.S. passport for your travels. While we are aware that in some cases, naturalized U.S. citizens use their alternate country's passport to travel, our expectation is that you will use the U.S. passport to travel from another country to the U.S. at both points of travel, departing the foreign country, and arriving into the U.S.
#543
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: EVA Air , * G, QR Privilege Club S
Posts: 5,230
It looks like the US government is as confused as the rest of us. The State Department states., U.S. nationals, including U.S. dual nationals, must use a U.S. passport to enter and leave the United States. U.S. dual nationals may also be required by the country of their foreign nationality to use that country’s passport to enter and leave that country.
#544
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BNE
Programs: NZ*G, QF Bronze, VA Red
Posts: 563
As a dual citizen of AU and NZ, cross country travel is a gigantic pain - have to have passports of both countries, and show both passports at both ends, because neither country can grant a visa to a citizen, but both countries must still validate right of entry. Sometimes you can wing it, sometimes it all falls apart.
It may very well be an issue. Not necessarily an insurmountable one but still.
#545
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Colorado (anywhere between DEN DMM BAH)
Programs: United MileagePlus, SkyMiles, AAdvantage, NEXUS
Posts: 3,035
That's actually a terrible example, as AU/NZ both have rules requiring entry on their respective passports, and not permitting the grant of an ETA (or NZeTA) to citizens.
As a dual citizen of AU and NZ, cross country travel is a gigantic pain - have to have passports of both countries, and show both passports at both ends, because neither country can grant a visa to a citizen, but both countries must still validate right of entry. Sometimes you can wing it, sometimes it all falls apart.
It may very well be an issue. Not necessarily an insurmountable one but still.
As a dual citizen of AU and NZ, cross country travel is a gigantic pain - have to have passports of both countries, and show both passports at both ends, because neither country can grant a visa to a citizen, but both countries must still validate right of entry. Sometimes you can wing it, sometimes it all falls apart.
It may very well be an issue. Not necessarily an insurmountable one but still.
#546
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NYC
Programs: AA 2MM, Bonvoy LTT, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,660
Heading to US check in with US passport . Heading to EU check in with EU passport.
I believe this has been covered several times already.
Last edited by seawolf; Sep 2, 2023 at 6:15 pm
#547
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BNE
Programs: NZ*G, QF Bronze, VA Red
Posts: 563
If you're traveling to Australia for example, your eligibility is determined when your passport is scanned at boarding. You scan a US passport on departure from SFO for example when you have AU citizenship, it will flag "DO NOT BOARD" because the Department of Home Affairs systems will say that individual has no ETA, and if that individual tried to apply for one, it would be refused (due to being ineligible as a citizen) while if you scanned another passport, the I-94 records will be way out of whack and cause issues for re-entry, since the US uses APIS as a primary source of exit data.
Some countries (cough, the US) use check-in/APIS data in lieu of exit immigration. Your departure is as important as your arrival. There's a reason that ICAO has a working group sorting this. Because right now it's a mess that unfairly stings travellers. Especially dual-citizen ones.
#548
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NYC
Programs: AA 2MM, Bonvoy LTT, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 14,660
Some countries (cough, the US) use check-in/APIS data in lieu of exit immigration. Your departure is as important as your arrival. There's a reason that ICAO has a working group sorting this. Because right now it's a mess that unfairly stings travellers. Especially dual-citizen ones.
That is the part that people keep bringing up here as a concern but have not quite really articulated what is the actual problem.
#549
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Colorado (anywhere between DEN DMM BAH)
Programs: United MileagePlus, SkyMiles, AAdvantage, NEXUS
Posts: 3,035
There's one Reddit thread where I've bickered with someone who keeps advocating for using ESTA on one's EU passport to get to the US if someone can't use their US passport. And when I told him it's a terrible idea because this could subject them to scrutiny at the US border and be referred to secondary and kept there for hours, they insisted I put forth citations, which I couldn't because I don't recall the exact places I've read about the experiences. That person declared themselves "right" because of this . They also linked to several Reddit threads that alarmed me because almost everyone in those threads were encouraging taking this step with only one person warning against it but not giving sufficient details. I told the person to try doing that and report back to us.
So there's an alarming streak of people being paranoid about something that needs no paranoia AND a refusal to take common sense advice and common experiences as valid.
I've no clue why there's such a pushback. The airlines transmit APIS info to the US that the dual citizen is a US citizen even if the name on their boarding pass is different and this has been the experience for many people over and over without failure. It's as simple as that and it will be the same with ETIAS and ETA (UK).
#550
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 2
The difference between carrying one or two passports is completely negligible, and I don't think the kiosks take national ID cards. I will try that on a human agent when I go to PPT next week... although that isn't Schengen, technically.
#551
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SEA, or BOS, or MUC, or other places (probably connecting). "Detroit, Michigan is in the Eastern time zone."
Programs: DL PM/1MM, AS 100K, NEXUS/GE, CLEAR, Bonvoy Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,202
If you're traveling to Australia for example, your eligibility is determined when your passport is scanned at boarding. You scan a US passport on departure from SFO for example when you have AU citizenship, it will flag "DO NOT BOARD" because the Department of Home Affairs systems will say that individual has no ETA, and if that individual tried to apply for one, it would be refused (due to being ineligible as a citizen) while if you scanned another passport, the I-94 records will be way out of whack and cause issues for re-entry, since the US uses APIS as a primary source of exit data.
I could see this being a potential problem for a Canadian/Australian dual citizen routing through the US on the way to AU...but there are ways to handle that situation.
#552
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Colorado (anywhere between DEN DMM BAH)
Programs: United MileagePlus, SkyMiles, AAdvantage, NEXUS
Posts: 3,035
Not scanning a US passport when departing the US is going to do what? Mark the US citizen as having overstayed in the US, a country they have a legal right to reside in? There won't be an I-94 missing a departure record, since citizens don't need I-94s. Their return to the US will be perfectly routine.
I could see this being a potential problem for a Canadian/Australian dual citizen routing through the US on the way to AU...but there are ways to handle that situation.
I could see this being a potential problem for a Canadian/Australian dual citizen routing through the US on the way to AU...but there are ways to handle that situation.
I’m certain airlines do communicate second passports/citizenships for these purposes as people have been traveling this way for years and I know a couple of US-Aussie dual citizens who travel this way without a hitch. I don’t see why this would be different for US-EU citizens when ETIAS is implemented (barring any mishaps at the start of it).
I still don’t get what the hoopla is all about.
As for the I-94, I don’t know why this would be an issue. I-94s aren’t even paper anymore so I’m not sure what the info in the link is supposed to help with.
And in that routing a Canadian-Australian can just get ESTA for their Aussie passport. Or else they show originating airline in Canada both passport to show they don’t need ESTA or the ETA and communicate both things to US and AU for APIS. There could be some complications but the other US-EU/AU passport situations are much easier to deal with.
Last edited by Nayef; Sep 3, 2023 at 2:03 pm
#553
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Colorado (anywhere between DEN DMM BAH)
Programs: United MileagePlus, SkyMiles, AAdvantage, NEXUS
Posts: 3,035
If you're traveling to Australia for example, your eligibility is determined when your passport is scanned at boarding. You scan a US passport on departure from SFO for example when you have AU citizenship, it will flag "DO NOT BOARD" because the Department of Home Affairs systems will say that individual has no ETA, and if that individual tried to apply for one, it would be refused (due to being ineligible as a citizen) while if you scanned another passport, the I-94 records will be way out of whack and cause issues for re-entry, since the US uses APIS as a primary source of exit data.
the same name/spelling). Even if the name is different, there must be some mechanism to communicate that to AU for APIS or else many people would’ve run into issues. The scenario you present is very unlikely to result in a do not board situation.
#554
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
#555
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SEA
Posts: 3,959
If you're traveling to Australia for example, your eligibility is determined when your passport is scanned at boarding. You scan a US passport on departure from SFO for example when you have AU citizenship, it will flag "DO NOT BOARD" because the Department of Home Affairs systems will say that individual has no ETA, and if that individual tried to apply for one, it would be refused (due to being ineligible as a citizen) while if you scanned another passport, the I-94 records will be way out of whack and cause issues for re-entry, since the US uses APIS as a primary source of exit data.