Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA.gov multi-lingual information - incorrect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 10:18 am
  #1  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
TSA.gov multi-lingual information - incorrect

http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/transl...ity_german.pdf

While I do give them credit for fixing parts of the website to list 3,4 ounces and 100ml, apparently we furriners are limited to 3 ounces and 90 ml.

http://www.tsa.gov/311/311-brochures.shtm
exbayern is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 1:20 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,096
Reasons for the inconsistency:

1) "TSA is a new agency and these things take time". (Of course, I've seen new signs and videos put up in the last year that still contain the old information. And everyone knows that changing/correcting a single piece of data on a website is so hard).

2) "Inconsistency is TSA's motto". Yes, that will fool the terrorists - they'll get so confused about the rules that they'll make a mistake or get frustrated and give up.

3) "All nations are equal, but the US is the best". We're still waiting for the rest of the world to get its act together and get off the metric system.

BTW, the change to allow 3.4 ounces instead of 3 ounces was absolutely not out of consideration for foreign travellers - it was because there are many products that Americans use that are manufactured and labelled to world standards, ie, metric.

And yes, there are the occasional TSOs who don't get it and who require pax to forfeit containers labelled 3.1 ounces because it exceeds "3-1-1".
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 5:38 pm
  #3  
30 Nights
1M
50 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily(CTA)/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston(IAH)/Red Stick, La.(BTR)/airborne in-between
Programs: United Plat (1MM), AA ExecPlat, ITA/AZ Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG gold
Posts: 3,875
They don't even speak proper English, let us not hope they could get other languages correct.
FlyingHoustonian is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 5:46 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Originally Posted by FlyingHoustonian
They don't even speak proper English, let us not hope they could get other languages correct.
It gets worse.

Germans are apparently only permitted 3oz or 90ml on the document I linked, but on another document in German on the TSA site it lists 90ml on one side, but 100ml on the other side of the document.

However, French and Spanish speakers are permiited 3oz, or 100ml. (which are not the same thing)

Shall we make it a game and see how many errors we can spot? I was frankly too tired to actually read the documents and proof spelling and grammar, but if this is any indication........
exbayern is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 10:14 pm
  #5  
30 Nights
1M
50 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily(CTA)/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston(IAH)/Red Stick, La.(BTR)/airborne in-between
Programs: United Plat (1MM), AA ExecPlat, ITA/AZ Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG gold
Posts: 3,875
Originally Posted by exbayern
It gets worse.

Germans are apparently only permitted 3oz or 90ml on the document I linked, but on another document in German on the TSA site it lists 90ml on one side, but 100ml on the other side of the document.

However, French and Spanish speakers are permiited 3oz, or 100ml. (which are not the same thing)

Shall we make it a game and see how many errors we can spot? I was frankly too tired to actually read the documents and proof spelling and grammar, but if this is any indication........
There were some problems with that "back in the day" a few years ago when the rule was 100ml but TSA couldn't figure that out. Nearly had cologne pulled after a int'l reconnect at EWR once, but I got animated in Italian and it actually worked and I got through.

Then we can get into the volume versus mass or weight problems...sad.
FlyingHoustonian is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2012 | 12:50 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,684
Originally Posted by exbayern
http://www.tsa.gov/assets/pdf/transl...ity_german.pdf

While I do give them credit for fixing parts of the website to list 3,4 ounces and 100ml, apparently we furriners are limited to 3 ounces and 90 ml.

http://www.tsa.gov/311/311-brochures.shtm
Your beer is a lot stronger than ours. 3 ounces of German beer equals 3.4 ounces of American beer.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2012 | 1:20 pm
  #7  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,096
Originally Posted by mikeef
Your beer is a lot stronger than ours. 3 ounces of German beer equals 3.4 ounces of American beer.

Mike
chollie is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2012 | 1:04 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,807
Another Google Translate Dog...

(AFAIK - U.S. Government does not do in-house translate unless it is sensitive.)
garykung is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2012 | 1:55 pm
  #9  
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 627
Mrs. Mahohmei recently bought a bunch of reusable rubbery break-proof bottles to carry shampoo while traveling--she actually got them right before a car trip, but nonetheless didn't want to lug around full-size shampoo bottles.

The bottles are clearly labeled "3 oz / 90 mL", since the label on a reusable travel shampoo bottle is a firm indicator that the contents are not explosive. A sub-3 oz, pre-9/11 reusable travel shampoo bottle could possibly have explosives in it, since with no label, there's no telling its volume or contents. For we all know, there could be a _gallon_ of liquid explosives hidden in that bottle.

What we need is a federal law requiring all explosives to be packaged in wood crates with "ACME / DANGER / EXPLOSIVES" stenciled on the side, for the purpose of making TSA identification of explosives far easier.

Originally Posted by chollie
3) "All nations are equal, but the US is the best". We're still waiting for the rest of the world to get its act together and get off the metric system.

BTW, the change to allow 3.4 ounces instead of 3 ounces was absolutely not out of consideration for foreign travellers - it was because there are many products that Americans use that are manufactured and labelled to world standards, ie, metric.

And yes, there are the occasional TSOs who don't get it and who require pax to forfeit containers labelled 3.1 ounces because it exceeds "3-1-1".
mahohmei is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 7:55 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Paris
Posts: 577
Well, the French version claims that the baggie is only for short flights and that lighters should be left at home or will be confiscated, and has some strange turns of phrase.
Louie_LI is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.