TSA: very effective?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 184
Is this strange? Since the TSA implemented body scanners I have flown more than 25 segments to mostly major cities such as JFK, and SFO and Ihavenever been through a body scanner or parsley.Multiple times at JFK and Ft Lauderdale, and once at DCA they have turned it off just one or two people away from me.
Now I'm not complaining but this doesn't seem like very effective use of very expensive technology.
- Mike from seatrate.blogspot.com
Now I'm not complaining but this doesn't seem like very effective use of very expensive technology.
- Mike from seatrate.blogspot.com
#2
Senior Moderator




Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: UA Plat/2MM [23-yr. 1K, now emeritus] clawing way back to WN-A List; MR LT Titanium; HY Whateverist.
Posts: 12,458
Please follow the thread as it moves to the Travel Safety/Security forum. Ocn Vw 1K, Moderator, TravelBuzz.
#3

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Is this strange? Since the TSA implemented body scanners I have flown more than 25 segments to mostly major cities such as JFK, and SFO and Ihavenever been through a body scanner or parsley.Multiple times at JFK and Ft Lauderdale, and once at DCA they have turned it off just one or two people away from me.
Now I'm not complaining but this doesn't seem like very effective use of very expensive technology.
- Mike from seatrate.blogspot.com
Now I'm not complaining but this doesn't seem like very effective use of very expensive technology.
- Mike from seatrate.blogspot.com
You seem to share a viewpoint which many illinformed travellers (or non-travellers) in the US share.
It is not the fact that you have not yet been scanned that it is a concern. Rather, the lack of effectiveness of the scanners is the concern.
Are you aware that other countries have tested and rejected the scanners as being ineffective? Just a few weeks ago the extended test in Germany ended, and was called a 'dismal failure'. Over a year ago, when scanners were first demanded, a German television program demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the scanners.
This is one major reason why so many here are angry. Money is being spent on ineffective tools, whilst gaping holes in security remain unaddressed.
Perhaps you would be willing to spend some time here and really try and understand the issues here. I suspect that you will receive several emotional responses to your post, but please do as I did a few years ago and take the time to do some research yourself on this subject.
#4

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Please feel free to start reading here:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...rmany-ham.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...s-useless.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...r-germany.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...t-germany.html
And here:
And here is a video which you should definitely watch - make sure that you have the subtitles turned on if you don't speak German, and do watch the entire thing. The large man is a famous Austrian physicist, known for his 'myth busting' type of popular science, and the moderator is one of the most famous and popular ones on German television, known for his investigative segments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idICUSiGcqo
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...rmany-ham.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...s-useless.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...r-germany.html
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...t-germany.html
And here:
As I posted on another thread
...
2) the scanner creates a 'false positive' because it cannot see through 'folds or pleats' ie layers of clothing. That could be a shirt tucked in, for example
3) the estimate given by German officials is that 75-90% of those scanned during the test phase required a physical check to resolve the issue
...
Also want to point out that there are many reports of the TSA screeners being unable to spot the dangerous items as well...
And a response as to why there may be a variation between the reported/estimated percentage of those requiring scans in the US vs the German tests
...
2) the scanner creates a 'false positive' because it cannot see through 'folds or pleats' ie layers of clothing. That could be a shirt tucked in, for example
3) the estimate given by German officials is that 75-90% of those scanned during the test phase required a physical check to resolve the issue
...
Also want to point out that there are many reports of the TSA screeners being unable to spot the dangerous items as well...
If we assume that both sets of reports are accurate, I wonder why the US figure is 20% and the German estimate is low end 75%? Could it be also that in the US I often see people being ordered to remove every single thing such as rings, tissues, paper from pockets and maybe in Germany they do not do so? Could it be the clothing being worn ie American travellers seem to have been conditioned to wear simple clothing and as little as possible to make screening 'easier', while German travellers still tend to wear business attire and/or layers? Or could it be that at least one of these figures is either being under or over estimated?
And here is a video which you should definitely watch - make sure that you have the subtitles turned on if you don't speak German, and do watch the entire thing. The large man is a famous Austrian physicist, known for his 'myth busting' type of popular science, and the moderator is one of the most famous and popular ones on German television, known for his investigative segments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idICUSiGcqo
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, UA Silver, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Titanium, Nat'l EE, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,637
Is this strange? Since the TSA implemented body scanners I have flown more than 25 segments to mostly major cities such as JFK, and SFO and Ihavenever been through a body scanner or parsley.Multiple times at JFK and Ft Lauderdale, and once at DCA they have turned it off just one or two people away from me.
Now I'm not complaining but this doesn't seem like very effective use of very expensive technology.
- Mike from seatrate.blogspot.com
Now I'm not complaining but this doesn't seem like very effective use of very expensive technology.
- Mike from seatrate.blogspot.com
#6

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ARN
Programs: SK EBG, BAEC Gold, LH FTL, FBP, CCG, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,533
Actually, we might be less safe with the scanners running since the TSA might think they are working as advertised and may relax other security measures. I just hope this madness doesn't get a firm hold in Europe. Only place where I've encountered it so far was at a gate at AMS.
#7

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Actually, we might be less safe with the scanners running since the TSA might think they are working as advertised and may relax other security measures. I just hope this madness doesn't get a firm hold in Europe. Only place where I've encountered it so far was at a gate at AMS.
There were tests in Finland, Germany and Italy but every other EU nation has not put scanners in place, and Germany is currently investigating the results and will report out soon on the 'dismal failure' as noted above.
Almost two years after scanners were pushed through, I find it telling that very few countries have implemented them, and some apparently only grudgingly in limited amounts.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, UA Silver, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Titanium, Nat'l EE, Avis PC, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,637
Actually, we might be less safe with the scanners running since the TSA might think they are working as advertised and may relax other security measures. I just hope this madness doesn't get a firm hold in Europe. Only place where I've encountered it so far was at a gate at AMS.
#9


Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New York and Vienna
Programs: PA WorldPass Platinum, AA, DL, LH. GHA Black, SPG and HHonors Gold
Posts: 3,872
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
#11
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,051
In our "contractor state" where elected officials receive emoluments from corporations eager for federal gravy, a lot of expensive ineffetive, unnecessary stuff is acquired by government departments. What follows is a grand demonstration why it was "a good use of taxpayer money" (or lately "a good reason to sell more bonds to China"). So they get us coming and going. Burden us with the present or future cost. Then make us miserable as we travel, all to make these government contractors happy. Because when they are happy, their buddies in Congress are happy. And nothing is more important than the power elite in federal branches being happy. We should be glad our misery is keeping these potentates happy.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend




Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72,266
However, we are, as a nation, poorer because of TSA - in a literal sense thanks to waste of money they represent, and figuratively, given how we've allowed a mindless and unattainable quest for "security" undermine the values that this country was founded upon.

