Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

NoS - Will old surgery scars trigger "pat down"?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

NoS - Will old surgery scars trigger "pat down"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 9:41 am
  #1  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sleepytown, Canada
Posts: 83
Question NoS - Will old surgery scars trigger "pat down"?

Will be going through BUF and TPA security this summer. Regarding NoS, you think 20 year old scars (surgery) will trigger a lovely "pat down"? There's 4 of them and they're about 2 inches across.
Love the Flyertalk forums - very informative!
Pidge is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 9:55 am
  #2  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: BOS and vicinity
Programs: Former UA 1P
Posts: 3,730
http://aprn.org/2011/03/16/represent...s-in-congress/

Alaska State Representative Sharon Cissna was the star witness at a U.S. House hearing today (Wednesday) about TSA oversight. The Transportation Security Administration was under scrutiny in Washington for its use of full body scans and hands-on examinations. Cissna told members of a House Oversight subcommittee about her experience getting what she describes as an invasive pat-down at the Seattle-Tacoma Airport last month.

Cissna is a breast cancer survivor and has scars from a mastectomy that showed up in a full body scan. When a T-S-A worker insisted on touching her, Cissna refused. She was not allowed to fly, so she left the airport and made the long trip to Alaska by road and ferry instead.

Cissna told the committee that the innocent phrase pat down didnt begin to describe what she went through the first time she had to get a body search after her scars registered on a scanner.
There are other threads on this topic, but I'm posting this link and text as a direct response to the question asked.
studentff is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 10:21 am
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by Pidge
Will be going through BUF and TPA security this summer. Regarding NoS, you think 20 year old scars (surgery) will trigger a lovely "pat down"? There's 4 of them and they're about 2 inches across.
Love the Flyertalk forums - very informative!
Anything can trigger a gropedown from the smurfs, including their pure whim.

They don't have to justify their actions to you - and the resulting attitude from them makes them dangerous to themselves and anyone near them.

The TSA is currently comprised of three types of employees:

1) Thieves, molesters, and other actual criminals.

2) People who enjoy the illusion of authority they are granted by their spiffy blue shirt, and enjoy lording it over the passengers.

3) People who simply can't get a job anywhere else for lack of ambition or qualifications.

There are those who claim they're trying to change the TSA from the inside, but they've shown absolutely no results whatsoever while the TSA continues its steep decline into jackbootery.

End result: if you want to guarantee that you are not molested by the TSA, do not go where they are. This includes airports, train stations, bus stations, and other public locations.
Caradoc is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 10:24 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: TSO, AS MVP, AOPA member, Private Pilot ASEL
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by Pidge
Will be going through BUF and TPA security this summer. Regarding NoS, you think 20 year old scars (surgery) will trigger a lovely "pat down"? There's 4 of them and they're about 2 inches across.
Love the Flyertalk forums - very informative!
No they will not. They won't be visible, just like tattoos aren't.
TSO1973 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 10:27 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,992
TSA's use of AIT Strip Search machines may show an anomaly although TSA is only authorized to search for WEI.

TSA's AIT Strip Search Machines violate screening guidelines for exactly the reason you question, they do not detect WEI but do detect body anomalies that are no threat and no business of TSA.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 10:38 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 733
Originally Posted by TSO1973
No they will not. They won't be visible, just like tattoos aren't.
Huh.

Are you saying that the Honorable Sharon Cissna is a liar?
barbell is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:08 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Programs: TSO, AS MVP, AOPA member, Private Pilot ASEL
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by barbell
Huh.

Are you saying that the Honorable Sharon Cissna is a liar?
That story just said irregularity, doesn't get any more specific than that. Doesn't say that it is a scar.
TSO1973 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:12 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
There have been many stories of pax who have been subject to pat downs for this and other equally rediculous reasons (one testicle bigger than the other due to an old injury, for example). I would just go for the pat down and sneer at the groper the entire time saying something like "I'm sure that feeling me up is making air travel soooo much safer!! (/sarcasm emoticon)"
DeafBlonde is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:17 am
  #9  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: CLE
Programs: UA Gold, HH Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,719
I have been through a MMW several times and a backscatter once. I have 3 year old huge abdominal scar. It has never triggered a pat down. (I usually opt out of the backscatter for radiation reasons).

YMMV
manneca is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:17 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by DeafBlonde
I would just go for the pat down and sneer at the groper the entire time saying something like "I'm sure that feeling me up is making air travel soooo much safer!! (/sarcasm emoticon)"
There's no point in sneering at someone who is incapable of feeling either shame or empathy.
Caradoc is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:25 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
500k
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 30,992
Originally Posted by TSO1973
That story just said irregularity, doesn't get any more specific than that. Doesn't say that it is a scar.
Do the TSA Body Scanners detect weapons?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:34 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 855
While I strongly feel that breast cancer survivors' privacy and dignity are sacrosanct, I cautiously advise readers that in the case of most breast cancer survivors, "scars" are an emotionally necessary euphemism for consequences of life saving surgery that do indeed constitute physical irregularities. It is indecently cruel to dwell on this.

A scar that simply effects the skin usually will not register as an irregularity.

There's no need to believe that anyone's lying here.
ElizabethConley is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:36 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 299
"Sandra Fish, a correspondent with Politics Daily who's also had a mastectomy and had a similar TSA experience at Denver International Airport, offers insight as to why the scanner may have alerted to Cissna's mastectomy. She notes that her mastectomy and reconstruction is a composition of part of her lat dorsi (mid-back muscle) and a skin graft from her back, supplemented by a sac of silicone. In response to Fish's experience in Denver, Carrie Harmon, a TSA spokeswoman, explained that the so-called "Millimeter Wave" isn't intended to detect "fake breasts". She explained that the scanner looks for metallic and non-metallic items under clothing, and suggested it could have been something else inside Fish's body.

Thus it appears that the scanner is alerting to the silicone gel, and a plastic surgeon, Dr. Winfield Hartley, opines that this will continue until the image readers and the screeners get used to seeing implant imagery."

http://alaskapride.blogspot.com/2011...a-refuses.html
I'd Rather Walk is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 11:40 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 331
Originally Posted by I'd Rather Walk
"Sandra Fish, a correspondent with Politics Daily who's also had a mastectomy and had a similar TSA experience at Denver International Airport, offers insight as to why the scanner may have alerted to Cissna's mastectomy. She notes that her mastectomy and reconstruction is a composition of part of her lat dorsi (mid-back muscle) and a skin graft from her back, supplemented by a sac of silicone. In response to Fish's experience in Denver, Carrie Harmon, a TSA spokeswoman, explained that the so-called "Millimeter Wave" isn't intended to detect "fake breasts". She explained that the scanner looks for metallic and non-metallic items under clothing, and suggested it could have been something else inside Fish's body.

Thus it appears that the scanner is alerting to the silicone gel, and a plastic surgeon, Dr. Winfield Hartley, opines that this will continue until the image readers and the screeners get used to seeing implant imagery."

http://alaskapride.blogspot.com/2011...a-refuses.html
But but..the scanners aren't configured to an intensity that can see under the skin...so they "can't" be dangerous.

Shin bones anyone??
Mimi111 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2011 | 2:12 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
Originally Posted by Caradoc
There's no point in sneering at someone who is incapable of feeling either shame or empathy.
Gotcha!
I suppose insult won't work either: "Did you know that you have really bad breath? Do you ever brush your teeth?"
DeafBlonde is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.