A reason not to linger in the lav.
#16
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCO
Programs: DL-DM/1MM, HILTON-DIA, .HYATT-DIA/GLOB , IHG-PLT,HERTZ 5*, NATIONAL ES
Posts: 8,700
It takes me about five minutes to brush my teeth. I guess it's neurotic but, hey, at least my dentist is happy. I've had the FAs pound on the lav door a few times in days gone by, but in recent years, I just get an extra cup and a second cup of water, and brush my teeth in my seat. Then all I have to do in the lav is quickly dump the spit in the cup into the sink or toilet, which takes just a couple seconds. By brushing my teeth more or less in public, I do get dirty looks from the poor guy in the middle seat, but I figure dirty looks from somebody who doesn't brush his teeth on a long flight, is preferable to scaring the bleep out of the FAs.
:-)
:-)
, i guess it beats clipping one's toe nails...
#17
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Titanium, "Lifetime" DL DM (subject to DL CEO whims)
Posts: 12,801
Thanks StayingHomeIsBetter. Let me expand on the 'flammability' of oxygen. Unlike other gases and chemicals, oxygen is not flammable. It is classified as an accelerator, meaning that if there is a fire and oxygen is present, the fire will burn. The more oxygen, the larger the fire and the faster it will spread. We are use to seeing fires burn in an atmosphere containing about 21 percent oxygen. Add more oxygen, the faster things burn. (is this a yawn icon?
)
)
#18


Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wayne, PA USA
Programs: DL MM, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, HHonors Gold
Posts: 7,284
Um, people, you realize that planes flew for decades with ashtrays in the lavs for goodness sakes, and planes weren't blowing up in the skies throughout the 50s, 60s, 70s and early 80s. With all due respect, the continued desire of our society to maintain the irrational "state of fear" is really absurd.
#19


Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: DL Diamond, HHonors Diamond, National Executive Elite
Posts: 2,475
#20


Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Canada
Programs: UA, AC, DL, WS, AS, Hotels
Posts: 2,595
Um, people, you realize that planes flew for decades with ashtrays in the lavs for goodness sakes, and planes weren't blowing up in the skies throughout the 50s, 60s, 70s and early 80s. With all due respect, the continued desire of our society to maintain the irrational "state of fear" is really absurd.
There again, it's long been the case that you are 'safer' in many respects on certain foreign carriers as opposed to being on a US carrier, due mainly to the shortsightedness of the respective US regulatory bodies. For instance, on a European carrier's longhaul flights, the crew members will have been trained by the airline to a far greater level of aviation medical training than in the US, not too mention the equipment carried is superior and can also be accessed by the crew (doctors box etc).
Likewise for infant restraint belts - carried for years by European carriers, but the advice in an emergency from US carriers - put your baby on the floor, hold on, and hope they survive if you have to make an emergency landing.
But we digress. Thanks to the OP for the link even if article is not DL specific.
#21


Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: DL-Pyrite Medallion
Posts: 319
Obviously as crew members, we have known about this for some time....I'm somewhat surprised it took this long to reach the light of day.
The majority of decrompression events resulting in mask deployment are gradual events where sudden loss of consciousness is unlikely and PAX will have time to get to a seat and grab a mask. Explosive Decompression where sudden LOC might happen is very rare, but in those events, the Flight Attendants have walkaround O2 bottles and we've been briefing them to clear the lavs in a loss of pressurization event on modded aircraft. I wouldn't lose any sleep over this.
Would you care to delineate the 'superior' equipment that I've been missing all these years so I can know my deficiencies?
The majority of decrompression events resulting in mask deployment are gradual events where sudden loss of consciousness is unlikely and PAX will have time to get to a seat and grab a mask. Explosive Decompression where sudden LOC might happen is very rare, but in those events, the Flight Attendants have walkaround O2 bottles and we've been briefing them to clear the lavs in a loss of pressurization event on modded aircraft. I wouldn't lose any sleep over this.
Would you care to delineate the 'superior' equipment that I've been missing all these years so I can know my deficiencies?
#22
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: AS MVP, PriorityPass, Global Entry
Posts: 748
so if the pressure in the cabin drops, and your in the lav, wouldnt the pressure difference between the closed lav and the cabin create a large differential that would hold the door closed, preventing you from opening it easily in order to reach a mask outside the lav? Thereby ensuring that anyone IN the lav at the time will probably die?
#23


Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 953
so if the pressure in the cabin drops, and your in the lav, wouldnt the pressure difference between the closed lav and the cabin create a large differential that would hold the door closed, preventing you from opening it easily in order to reach a mask outside the lav? Thereby ensuring that anyone IN the lav at the time will probably die?
Anyway, without an oxygen mask you're likely to lose consciousness but given that brain damage, of the permanent-death kind, occurs at 4-6 min (depends on a lot of factors) without oxygen, and that the pilots are rapidly descending, it's unlikely that a person in a lav, without a mask, that is unaided by a FA, following an explosive decompression at 38,000', would perish in such an event.
ex., this flight (http://www.monstersandcritics.com/ne...omestic-flight) went from 36,000' to under 10,000' in less than 3 minutes. You'd have been OK unless on your way down you hit your head on the basin.
Is it more likely that a bad person would use the oxygen generator to blow a hole in the plane than someone dying from an explosive decompression? Difficult to say, but given that both probabilities are so infinitesimally small, we're really discussing pin heads and angels here.
#24
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,665
so if the pressure in the cabin drops, and your in the lav, wouldnt the pressure difference between the closed lav and the cabin create a large differential that would hold the door closed, preventing you from opening it easily in order to reach a mask outside the lav? Thereby ensuring that anyone IN the lav at the time will probably die?
"The oxidizer core is sodium chlorate (NaClO3), which is mixed with less than 5 percent barium peroxide (BaO2) and less than 1 percent potassium perchlorate (KClO4). The explosives in the percussion cap are a lead styphnate and tetrazene mixture. The chemical reaction is exothermic and the exterior temperature of the canister will reach 260 C (500 F). It will produce oxygen for 15 to 20 minutes." Access to this collection in a lav is potentially serious.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MN
Programs: Lots of programs, dirt on all of them!
Posts: 11,943
I sometimes get motion sick, on those occasions I let an FA know what's going on so she wouldn't be wondering and also so that she'll keep the rehydration (Coca-Cola) coming. I've gotten really good at managing it though, so it hasn't come up in awhile. I always carry motion sickness medication just in case; this plus Coca-Cola usually keeps me healthy.
Does the mention of Coke make this a Delta thread now? :-)
Does the mention of Coke make this a Delta thread now? :-)
#26
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Daytona Beach, Florida, USA
Programs: Delta DM; Hilton Diamond; SPG Platinum
Posts: 135
What you don't know if often more important than what you do...
[QUOTE=Down3Green;16010326]Obviously as crew members, we have known about this for some time....I'm somewhat surprised it took this long to reach the light of day. QUOTE]
Not all things are made public, even though they may not be secrets. Initially came out as a flight crew notification on February 10, 2011, that the oxygen generators may have been rendered inoperative and to check the lavs in case of a rapid decompression.
Now official, issued March 8, 2011, Airworthiness Directive 2011-04-09, that mandates that the lav oxygen generators were to be discharged or removed completely.
The do create a great deal of heat when activated, my guess is that someone figured out the the bad guys could do something quite nasty with them.
About the third time that mechanicals have been found, from a security aspect, and not disclosed to the general public. These are not safety issues, but security issues.
FM
Not all things are made public, even though they may not be secrets. Initially came out as a flight crew notification on February 10, 2011, that the oxygen generators may have been rendered inoperative and to check the lavs in case of a rapid decompression.
Now official, issued March 8, 2011, Airworthiness Directive 2011-04-09, that mandates that the lav oxygen generators were to be discharged or removed completely.
The do create a great deal of heat when activated, my guess is that someone figured out the the bad guys could do something quite nasty with them.
About the third time that mechanicals have been found, from a security aspect, and not disclosed to the general public. These are not safety issues, but security issues.
FM
#27


Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MSP
Programs: Delta PM, Hertz Platinum, Sixt Diamond, LHW Aurelian, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond
Posts: 3,668
In most plane lavs I've used don't the doors fold in? A higher pressure inside would push the doors closed? I know the lav isn't airtight at all, but I'd assume it would at the very least make it slightly harder to open the door, esp if the ride becomes unstable, atleast untill the presure difference was reduced. I'm mainly thinking in case there is a child in there. I may be over thinking this though
#28


Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Canada
Programs: UA, AC, DL, WS, AS, Hotels
Posts: 2,595
I did not intimate that the crewmembers for US or Canadian carriers were deficient - but rather that in some regards, the tools and training provided to them are (compared to say JAA-ops carriers).
#29
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ICT
Programs: AA EXP, UA Plat, DL G, Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,330
Um, people, you realize that planes flew for decades with ashtrays in the lavs for goodness sakes, and planes weren't blowing up in the skies throughout the 50s, 60s, 70s and early 80s. With all due respect, the continued desire of our society to maintain the irrational "state of fear" is really absurd.
#30




Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta 1MM, Gold, Peon
Posts: 6,392
Just for all the "what's the threat" crowd.
Its not the produced oxygen.
These things use chemical oxygen generators. I suspect anybody with a knowledge of simple chemistry, some tools, and perhaps some extra fuel could make quite an effective explosive device out of this.
As to 'why just lavs", it would be a tad obvious if somebody started dismantling the oxygen system above his seat.
One might ask why Value Jet no longer exists.
Its not the produced oxygen.
These things use chemical oxygen generators. I suspect anybody with a knowledge of simple chemistry, some tools, and perhaps some extra fuel could make quite an effective explosive device out of this.
As to 'why just lavs", it would be a tad obvious if somebody started dismantling the oxygen system above his seat.
One might ask why Value Jet no longer exists.

