Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Double Patdown

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 7:58 pm
  #31  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 267
Originally Posted by thunderbirdfan
I got patted down twice.

I fly frequently as a non-rev & am outraged by this treatment done to me.
But it infuriates me even more when they do it to the revenue passenger...my family's bread & butter!
Thank goodness for the TSA. Next time take the bus
jrhmdtraum is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:03 pm
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still PAL Premier Elite & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 25,429
Originally Posted by exbayern
I believe that MrsMikeMpls was in a skirt when they made the decision not to fly over the upcoming holiday, and it may have been from MSP? I have been making my own study and certain airports seem to target skirt/dress wearers while others do not. DTW is another one which seems to select all skirt/dress wearers when I pass through security.
That happened at the TSA Cesspool @ STL. She almost always wears skirts (I can't remember when I last saw her in pants), and she always gets extra attention, until now just wanding or a minor patdown. At STL last time a supervisor came up & directed her designated molester to "follow the new procedure". The look on her face afterwards said everything.

Women who dress modestly & as women should not be harassed. On top of that I have my own privacy issues with regard to the new protocols, & WifeMpls has a specific medical contraindication for submitting to unnecessary x-rays.

We were already worn down by the incessant barking, bullying & generally rude behavior at many locations, STL in particular where we typically depart ~18-20 times a year.

After several successive unpleasant sessions w/ the schoolyard bullies last summer, I canceled all unnecessary trips that didn't involve prepaid expenses. With TSA's latest intrusion into our privacy & dignity, we just have to say that "enough is enough". If the Thanksgiving drive to STL works out, we'll eliminate 18-20 round trips a year.

We are no longer booking any airline travel, domestic or international. The disposition of our Christmas trip (ATH/FRA/CGN) is still up in the air.

I'll hang on to our CO/UA/DL miles with occasional non-flying activity; I've already started giving away WN credits & awards to friends & coworkers since they all have finite expiration dates, but on the condition that they must "opt out" & make their abusers change gloves.

Last edited by MikeMpls; Nov 14, 2010 at 8:27 pm
MikeMpls is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:08 pm
  #33  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Olathe (KC)
Posts: 637
Originally Posted by jrhmdtraum
Thank goodness for the TSA. Next time take the bus
You are not safe from the TSA on a bus: http://www.infowars.com/tsa-searches...us-passengers/
KansasMike is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:11 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CLT
Posts: 7,249
I never wear skirts, but I see a lot of business women wearing nice form fitting skirts. I guess I will not dress as they do.

I wonder what women of certain religious sects like Pentacostals and Mennonites will do since the women typically wear long, loose skirts.

The OP's story is just so weird that they claimed that the gloves do the detection and the WTMD detected something, yet didn't alarm.

i'm glad i only have 2 more trips this year.
gj83 is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:12 pm
  #35  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 508
One thing I've learned from the previous SAN incidinent, is that once you've given your ID to the checker, if they ask for it again, be ok to present it, but don't let it leave your hands.

As far as giving them more info, like a SS#, forget it.
msimons is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:23 pm
  #36  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
Originally Posted by gj83
I wonder what women of certain religious sects like Pentacostals and Mennonites will do since the women typically wear long, loose skirts.
Well, at least one here continues to wear her skirts, which do not fall into the definition of 'bulky'! CATSA has a female member of the MCC on the board and I do wonder if that influences the more liberal policies in Canada including the recent change to allow female CATSA employees to wear skirts of modest length.

I haven't been able to find much chatter online yet but there are many modest dress fora covering a wide variety of religions including LDS, Catholic, Jewish, Religious Society of Friends, as well as various traditionally plain churches. Often they are populated with stylish young women wearing modest yet fashionable clothing, and who do not stand out as 'different'.

The range of dress amongst some of these groups is so varied that the results and the discussions are I suspect varied as well. Many Mennonites for instance wear modern, fashionable clothing, just as some Mennonite groups may choose to wear plain dress.
exbayern is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:25 pm
  #37  
Used to be Sydneysider
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
This is beyond filing a complaint.

I recommend filing suit for a violation of the Privacy Act.
Savvy Traveler is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:26 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
Originally Posted by Sydneysider
This is beyond filing a complaint.

I recommend filing suit for a violation of the Privacy Act.
IIRC, both TSA posters on this forum and Bob over on the PV have stated that the TSA is exempted from the Privacy Act. (yes, I know their statements do not make it true, just passing my recollection along)
DevilDog438 is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 8:52 pm
  #39  
Used to be Sydneysider
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CPH
Programs: AS MVP/Gold (and 75K aspirant)
Posts: 2,984
Your recollection is correct. If it were me I'd be jumping at the chance to test that hypothesis in federal court.
Savvy Traveler is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 9:14 pm
  #40  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 76
Originally Posted by FetePerfection
I know you were. In fact I think you were too compliant, sorry. I really mean that anyone who refuses to just accept what TSA dictates as gospel is viewed as non-compliant in their eyes.
If I had another option, I would've left the airport like the SAN passenger.

Ground transportation was not an option, as it would've taken me a minimum of three days to get home. I needed to be home that day.

The TSA clerks were not going to permit me to proceed without the SS#.

From now on, my travel plans shall include options for avoiding TSA bullying.
thunderbirdfan is offline  
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 9:33 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Emerald City
Programs: 1MM AA - finally
Posts: 362
Originally Posted by thunderbirdfan
If I had another option, I would've left the airport like the SAN passenger.

Ground transportation was not an option, as it would've taken me a minimum of three days to get home. I needed to be home that day.

The TSA clerks were not going to permit me to proceed without the SS#.

From now on, my travel plans shall include options for avoiding TSA bullying.
I would never give them my SSN. If they absolutely insisted I would ask for an LEO, or give them the number 123-45-6789. How are they going to argue that it's not yours?
firespirit is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 12:02 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
Originally Posted by PhoenixRev
The Privacy Act of 1974 makes it very, very clear that you cannot be denied your rights or privileges under the law for refusing to give your SS# to a government actor or agency. Here is the language with the important parts bolded:
Thanks - this is a huge help and since I'm been bullied into giving my SSN to the TSA in the past, I will keep a copy of it.

Originally Posted by msimons
One thing I've learned from the previous SAN incidinent, is that once you've given your ID to the checker, if they ask for it again, be ok to present it, but don't let it leave your hands.
Good thought. Can they force you to re-identify yourself? What can the TSA force you to give them? Seems like they insist on BP and ID...

Originally Posted by thunderbirdfan
All this time, the first agent rifled through all my personal belongings.
She even went through my wallet, noting that I was "carrying a large amount of cash".
There is a certain point where rifling through your personal documents, checking your computer files, etc violates the 4th Amendment. I think that's actually settled case law. Definitely time to call an attorney, and also you might want to file a complaint with EPIC or the ACLU.
janetdoe is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 12:48 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, Marriott Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 291
Here's how I would answer the SSN question.

"I don't remember it off the top of my head. It's 021-something-something. Maybe 021-62, I think? Or is it 63? I don't carry my Social Security card with me."

Then if pushed, I will just make up a number with the caveat that I'm not entirely sure.

"Ma Kettle" doesn't necessarily remember her #. Better to play dumb than get into a fight with TSA over constitutional rights.
smp9778 is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 3:30 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
Originally Posted by DAL4550
It happened to me the last time I flew. As a female I get picked for the "random" screening every time. As I always opt out, I get searched. I can only assume that searching me twice for no reason and the associated delay was punitive and a feeble attempt at intimidation. Quite frankly, it has the opposite effect on me.
Here's irony for you. As a white/male, I've gone through customs only twice, that didn't involve a bag check. Someone once admitted that they needed to look like they were searching someone, knew I wasn't carrying, so they could let me go at any time, so they could fill the line.

Originally Posted by thunderbirdfan
But I was compliant because I had to get home that day & I was 2000 miles away.

My questions were stated in a calm manner.
Talk about a traveller being in a weak (or non-existant) negotiating position.
sbagdon is offline  
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 7:24 am
  #45  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Originally Posted by amejr999
I'd file a FOIA/Privacy Act request for that "report" and any related documentation.
And file it with the OIG and the GAO, as well as your congress representatives.

Originally Posted by JennyElf
Why are they asking for SS#? That's not information they should need at all. Considering I don't need a SS# to fly, and how much info is keyed to a SS#, I see no reason one should ever need to give it to a TSO.
Nothing good can come from providing that information. Nothing. Identity theft, adding you to watch lists, and so forth. I would refuse. Let 'em call the cops.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.