Double Patdown
#31
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 267
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still PAL Premier Elite & Hilton Diamond
Posts: 25,429
I believe that MrsMikeMpls was in a skirt when they made the decision not to fly over the upcoming holiday, and it may have been from MSP? I have been making my own study and certain airports seem to target skirt/dress wearers while others do not. DTW is another one which seems to select all skirt/dress wearers when I pass through security.
Women who dress modestly & as women should not be harassed. On top of that I have my own privacy issues with regard to the new protocols, & WifeMpls has a specific medical contraindication for submitting to unnecessary x-rays.
We were already worn down by the incessant barking, bullying & generally rude behavior at many locations, STL in particular where we typically depart ~18-20 times a year.
After several successive unpleasant sessions w/ the schoolyard bullies last summer, I canceled all unnecessary trips that didn't involve prepaid expenses. With TSA's latest intrusion into our privacy & dignity, we just have to say that "enough is enough". If the Thanksgiving drive to STL works out, we'll eliminate 18-20 round trips a year.
We are no longer booking any airline travel, domestic or international. The disposition of our Christmas trip (ATH/FRA/CGN) is still up in the air.
I'll hang on to our CO/UA/DL miles with occasional non-flying activity; I've already started giving away WN credits & awards to friends & coworkers since they all have finite expiration dates, but on the condition that they must "opt out" & make their abusers change gloves.
Last edited by MikeMpls; Nov 14, 2010 at 8:27 pm
#33




Join Date: May 2006
Location: Olathe (KC)
Posts: 637
You are not safe from the TSA on a bus: http://www.infowars.com/tsa-searches...us-passengers/
#34
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CLT
Posts: 7,249
I never wear skirts, but I see a lot of business women wearing nice form fitting skirts. I guess I will not dress as they do.
I wonder what women of certain religious sects like Pentacostals and Mennonites will do since the women typically wear long, loose skirts.
The OP's story is just so weird that they claimed that the gloves do the detection and the WTMD detected something, yet didn't alarm.
i'm glad i only have 2 more trips this year.
I wonder what women of certain religious sects like Pentacostals and Mennonites will do since the women typically wear long, loose skirts.
The OP's story is just so weird that they claimed that the gloves do the detection and the WTMD detected something, yet didn't alarm.
i'm glad i only have 2 more trips this year.
#35

Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 508
One thing I've learned from the previous SAN incidinent, is that once you've given your ID to the checker, if they ask for it again, be ok to present it, but don't let it leave your hands.
As far as giving them more info, like a SS#, forget it.
As far as giving them more info, like a SS#, forget it.
#36

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,964
I haven't been able to find much chatter online yet but there are many modest dress fora covering a wide variety of religions including LDS, Catholic, Jewish, Religious Society of Friends, as well as various traditionally plain churches. Often they are populated with stylish young women wearing modest yet fashionable clothing, and who do not stand out as 'different'.
The range of dress amongst some of these groups is so varied that the results and the discussions are I suspect varied as well. Many Mennonites for instance wear modern, fashionable clothing, just as some Mennonite groups may choose to wear plain dress.
#38
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somewhere near BWI
Programs: DL DM, HH Dia, SPG Gold, MR Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,654
IIRC, both TSA posters on this forum and Bob over on the PV have stated that the TSA is exempted from the Privacy Act. (yes, I know their statements do not make it true, just passing my recollection along)
#40
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 76
Ground transportation was not an option, as it would've taken me a minimum of three days to get home. I needed to be home that day.
The TSA clerks were not going to permit me to proceed without the SS#.
From now on, my travel plans shall include options for avoiding TSA bullying.
#41
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Emerald City
Programs: 1MM AA - finally
Posts: 362
If I had another option, I would've left the airport like the SAN passenger.
Ground transportation was not an option, as it would've taken me a minimum of three days to get home. I needed to be home that day.
The TSA clerks were not going to permit me to proceed without the SS#.
From now on, my travel plans shall include options for avoiding TSA bullying.
Ground transportation was not an option, as it would've taken me a minimum of three days to get home. I needed to be home that day.
The TSA clerks were not going to permit me to proceed without the SS#.
From now on, my travel plans shall include options for avoiding TSA bullying.
#42
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
The Privacy Act of 1974 makes it very, very clear that you cannot be denied your rights or privileges under the law for refusing to give your SS# to a government actor or agency. Here is the language with the important parts bolded:
There is a certain point where rifling through your personal documents, checking your computer files, etc violates the 4th Amendment. I think that's actually settled case law. Definitely time to call an attorney, and also you might want to file a complaint with EPIC or the ACLU.
#43
Join Date: Apr 2006
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, Marriott Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 291
Here's how I would answer the SSN question.
"I don't remember it off the top of my head. It's 021-something-something. Maybe 021-62, I think? Or is it 63? I don't carry my Social Security card with me."
Then if pushed, I will just make up a number with the caveat that I'm not entirely sure.
"Ma Kettle" doesn't necessarily remember her #. Better to play dumb than get into a fight with TSA over constitutional rights.
"I don't remember it off the top of my head. It's 021-something-something. Maybe 021-62, I think? Or is it 63? I don't carry my Social Security card with me."
Then if pushed, I will just make up a number with the caveat that I'm not entirely sure.
"Ma Kettle" doesn't necessarily remember her #. Better to play dumb than get into a fight with TSA over constitutional rights.
#44
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
It happened to me the last time I flew. As a female I get picked for the "random" screening every time. As I always opt out, I get searched. I can only assume that searching me twice for no reason and the associated delay was punitive and a feeble attempt at intimidation. Quite frankly, it has the opposite effect on me.
Talk about a traveller being in a weak (or non-existant) negotiating position.
#45




Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,386
Nothing good can come from providing that information. Nothing. Identity theft, adding you to watch lists, and so forth. I would refuse. Let 'em call the cops.


