![]() |
Originally Posted by cparekh
(Post 15032523)
Before my last flight, my wife was done with the groping before mine had begun, so I asked her if the guy was good looking enough to make it a threesome. I don't think the TSA groper got it, but she and I had a good laugh. As he rubbed me down, I kept telling him, ooooh that feels good. He kept rubbing harder each time I said it --- actually to the point that it did feel good.
|
perhaps in addition to the general Vogons on duty at the checkpoint, we should start referring to the grapers as 'fluffers'...
|
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 15036153)
TSA is already scraping the bottom of the employee pool barrel. Whats left, going under the barrel?
|
Originally Posted by DevilDog438
(Post 15034494)
Why would he not be allowed to continue for his vocalizations?
|
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 15036834)
Silly. As the TSA 2-striper at IAD said to a passenger in front of me "You have no rights at the checkpoint, especially first amendment rights. I will call a cop to detain you to make sure you miss your flight".
|
Originally Posted by eyecue
(Post 15034143)
I believe that it is only a matter of time before before this really escalates into something that no one wants.
|
I really torn about the best approach.
I fly out of BWI and have been subjected to the full "cupping the balls" search several times now. I find it abhorrent, and consider it unconstitutional. But not once have I encountered a person that did the "ball cupping" where I considered them to be personally blame-worthy. They were "just following orders". While they should know what they are doing is deeply wrong, they will lose their job if they participate in the new searches. They all looked as if they would have difficulty finding other employment, and at least had a facade of being apologetic that they needed to do a groping search. I'm guessing that will change in a few months, when the TSA bullying that I typically encounter (and freshly encounter when I insist on going through the magnetometer instead of the mm-x-ray tube on the way to my grope) extends to the full body search. |
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 15036945)
Which will undoubtedly cause the TSA to remove the ability to opt-out, making the strip-search machine mandatory.
Thats right, take away the ability to opt-out, make the nude-o-scope manditory along with the sexual molestation that probably comes with going thru the nude-o-scope anyways. Way to go TSA, fueling hatred of your agency and ruining the transportation industry all at the same time:mad: |
Originally Posted by eastport
(Post 15037032)
I really torn about the best approach.
I fly out of BWI and have been subjected to the full "cupping the balls" search several times now. I find it abhorrent, and consider it unconstitutional. But not once have I encountered a person that did the "ball cupping" where I considered them to be personally blame-worthy. They were "just following orders". While they should know what they are doing is deeply wrong, they will lose their job if they participate in the new searches. They all looked as if they would have difficulty finding other employment, and at least had a facade of being apologetic that they needed to do a groping search. I'm guessing that will change in a few months, when the TSA bullying that I typically encounter (and freshly encounter when I insist on going through the magnetometer instead of the mm-x-ray tube on the way to my grope) extends to the full body search. And, I suggest, we have to break the habit of writing "pat-down" and "professional" in the same sentence. The longer we sugar-coat this garbage, the easier it becomes for us to roll over and accept it. |
I was raped when I was younger.
So to me this is rape. All because it is done by a stranger that I havent said or will ever say yes to. If TSA pushes the issue with me. I will not let them do it volentary. I will probably get sick. |
Originally Posted by tanja
(Post 15037934)
I was raped when I was younger.
So to me this is rape. All because it is done by a stranger that I havent said or will ever say yes to. If TSA pushes the issue with me. I will not let them do it volentary. I will probably get sick. I dont have any travel for now, but next time i fly I will be well prepared and one nanometer over the line that clerk is going to sorely regret doing so even if means missing my flight. I have copies of the Texas Penal code and have memorized it for when i need it. TSA thinks we are all the enemy and sheep for the slaughter, what they dont realize is that they are sorely mistaken and the tide is turning. There are persons prepared to make a stand to stop them on many fronts. |
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
(Post 15038493)
Just remember if they do call for a Law enforcement officer and file a criminal complaint. Also if you want look for the statues in your state for sexual assault, and when you make your complaint read it verbatim as well as the description of what happened.
I dont have any travel for now, but next time i fly I will be well prepared and one nanometer over the line that clerk is going to sorely regret doing so even if means missing my flight. I have copies of the Texas Penal code and have memorized it for when i need it. TSA thinks we are all the enemy and sheep for the slaughter, what they dont realize is that they are sorely mistaken and the tide is turning. There are persons prepared to make a stand to stop them on many fronts. |
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 15034156)
Excellent news! Do they call for a LEO just to have one there, or have they had specific reasons?
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
(Post 15034318)
Good maybe a few clerks having the tar beaten out of them landing them in the ICU will get pissys attention that sexual assault and violations to the constitution will not be tolerated, and will change the policy.
|
Originally Posted by jampa
(Post 15011350)
I really do feel for those who have survived sexual assault being faced with the choice of either genital groping or being leered at to simply travel by air. :mad:
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 15034156)
Excellent news! Do they call for a LEO just to have one there, or have they had specific reasons?
|
Originally Posted by eyecue
(Post 15034143)
The last two days at DEN have been very interesting in that respect. There has been a lot more LEO stand ups for patdowns. A lot more irate people. One person said that we need to be specific in our advisals and include the word balls. One today just said this is efing bs. So much so that he almost did not get to continue. It started at the AIT when his cold start met me head on and I asked if he wanted to opt out. I believe that it is only a matter of time before before this really escalates into something that no one wants.
It's only escalating because TSA is overstepping. It's finally reached the point where people are pushing back, and they will continue to push back, harder & harder. If you're uncomfortable with what's coming, you have the option of seeking employment with a more respectable organization. On another front, a woman who'd been on my flight ran to catch up with me as we were going down the escalators in STL terminal #2 -- she wanted one of my Nude-O-Scope brocheres. :) People want the truth that they're not getting from TSA's Propaganda Village. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:30 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.